Brunell - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**SoorgoBardy** · 09-24-2006, 09:01 PM

Wow.

I just saw on the bottom of the screen during the Colts game that Mark Brunell is currently 21 for 21 for 247 yards.

Pretty good day so far.

**JAMES PIETERSE** · 09-24-2006, 09:08 PM

Wow.

I just saw on the bottom of the screen during the Colts game that Mark Brunell is currently 21 for 21 for 247 yards.

Pretty good day so far.

Those are video game numbers.

**Clolmemaexata** · 09-24-2006, 09:12 PM

Those are video game numbers.

Yeah, that's what I was thinking.

I don't remember anyone starting off 21-for-21 before.

**craditc** · 09-24-2006, 09:16 PM

Yeah, that's what I was thinking.

I don't remember anyone starting off 21-for-21 before.

Announcers used to fall all over themselves praising Kurt Warner's accuracy and it was only around 70%.

**CuittisIL** · 09-24-2006, 09:20 PM

Yeah, that's what I was thinking.

I don't remember anyone starting off 21-for-21 before.

Rich Gannon has the record i think they said...he was 21-21 as well

09-24-2006, 09:01 PM	#1
SoorgoBardy Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 432 Senior Member	Brunell Wow. I just saw on the bottom of the screen during the Colts game that Mark Brunell is currently 21 for 21 for 247 yards. Pretty good day so far. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-24-2006, 09:08 PM	#2
JAMES PIETERSE Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 520 Senior Member	Wow. I just saw on the bottom of the screen during the Colts game that Mark Brunell is currently 21 for 21 for 247 yards. Pretty good day so far. Those are video game numbers. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-24-2006, 09:12 PM	#3
Clolmemaexata Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 410 Senior Member	Those are video game numbers. Yeah, that's what I was thinking. I don't remember anyone starting off 21-for-21 before. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-24-2006, 09:16 PM	#4
craditc Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 524 Senior Member	Yeah, that's what I was thinking. I don't remember anyone starting off 21-for-21 before. Announcers used to fall all over themselves praising Kurt Warner's accuracy and it was only around 70%. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-24-2006, 09:20 PM	#5
CuittisIL Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 726 Senior Member	Yeah, that's what I was thinking. I don't remember anyone starting off 21-for-21 before. Rich Gannon has the record i think they said...he was 21-21 as well Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)