Reply to Thread New Thread |
05-25-2006, 08:00 AM | #61 |
|
|
|
06-05-2006, 08:00 AM | #62 |
|
|
|
06-09-2006, 08:00 AM | #63 |
|
|
|
06-10-2006, 08:00 AM | #64 |
|
If he proves he's worthy of starting, then he should be starting. And what does the Vikings runningback dpeth chart have to do with a QB Showdown? I call shenanigans! |
|
06-16-2006, 08:00 AM | #66 |
|
|
|
06-18-2006, 08:00 AM | #67 |
|
Favre v. Culpepper, 9 January 2005 |
|
06-23-2006, 08:00 AM | #68 |
|
Well, I decided to get an order established for the seedings. Note - This is not my personal ranking of the quarterbacks.
I used passing yards, touchdowns, interceptions, passer rating, and team wins in the calculations. If a quarterback was injured last year, I used their numbers from the previous season (I think I only had to do this 1 or 2 times). A reminder that this isn't meant to be a definitive list, but something I've used to set up an order for seeding. It's based on stats, not opinion, and I'm sure in spite of it, someone's going to be pissed off that quarterback X got a higher/lower seeding than quarterback Y. Calculated seedings (If there is a definite other starting quarterback than the one I have listed for each team, please let me know so I can adjust accordingly): 1] Peyton Manning, IND 2] Donovan McNabb, PHI 3] Daunte Culpepper, MIN 4] Drew Brees, SD 5] Steve McNair, TEN 6] Tom Brady, NE 7] Ben Roethlisberger, PIT 8] Brett Favre, GB 9] Trent Green, KC 10] Jake Delhomme, CAR 11] Marc Bulger, STL 12] Jake Plummer, DEN 13] Chad Pennington, NYJ 14] Matt Hasselbeck, SEA 15] Byron Leftwich, JAX 16] Aaron Brooks, NO 17] Michael Vick, ATL 18] David Carr, HOU 19] Brian Griese, TB 20] Drew Bledsoe, DAL 21] Joey Harrington, DET 22] Kyle Boller, BAL 23] Kurt Warner, ARI 24] Carson Palmer, CIN 25] Kerry Collins, OAK 26] Patrick Ramsey, WAS 27] Rex Grossman, CHI 28] Trent Dilfer, CLE 29] Tim Rattay, SF 30] JP Losman, BUF 31] Eli Manning, NYG 32] AJ Feeley, MIA |
|
06-30-2006, 08:00 AM | #69 |
|
|
|
07-02-2006, 08:00 AM | #70 |
|
Didn't they play each other 3 times last year? This gave them the right to get embarassed by the Vikings in front of their home fans and in front of a national TV audience after we listened to Packer fans and the national media declare Green Bay to be a dark horse for the Super Bowl. |
|
07-19-2006, 08:00 AM | #73 |
|
|
|
07-20-2006, 08:00 AM | #74 |
|
My top 10 McNair is too high, unless he proves he can come back from his injuries from last year. I'd probably go 1) Manning 2) McNabb 3) Brady 4) Culpepper 5) Favre 6) Hasselbeck 7) Trent Green 8) Drew Brees 9) McNair 10) Vick |
|
07-21-2006, 08:00 AM | #75 |
|
|
|
07-22-2006, 08:00 AM | #76 |
|
Well, I decided to get an order established for the seedings. Note - This is not my personal ranking of the quarterbacks. |
|
07-24-2006, 08:00 AM | #77 |
|
knock off the name calling fuckface. 26 year old Fred Smoot, a signing which gives us (arguably) the best CB tandem in the NFC? 29 year old Darren Sharper, a signing which gives us a huge upgrade at FS over what we had? 32 year old Pat Williams, who's regarded as one of the best run-stopping DTs in the game and is a huge upgrade over what we had? You mean one of those guys? Or do you mean people we acquired in trades, such as 25 year old Napoleon Harris, who was only the starting MLB on a team that went to the Super Bowl his rookie season? Or 30 year old Sam Cowart, who cost us all of a 7th round pick to acquire and is, in all likelihood, an upgrade over what we had? Yeah. . .SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO washed up. If all of those guys were Packers, they'd be awesome, right? It could be far worse. . .we could be signing guys like Earl "Cleveland thought that Brian Russell was better than me" Little Arturo "I couldn't pry my arse off the bench in Miami" Freeman Matt "24 games on IR in the last 2 years" O'Dwyer Adrian "Ouch, I'm hurt again!" Klemm While losing nothing but a Pro Bowl caliber safety and 2 of the best guards in the game, all the while acting like it's no big deal and that we're still some sort of great team. That would be worse. |
|
07-25-2006, 08:00 AM | #78 |
|
Favre v. Culpepper, 9 January 2005 culpepper is bigger than Favre in size, Ill give you that. thats it. |
|
07-31-2006, 08:00 AM | #79 |
|
|
|
08-02-2006, 08:00 AM | #80 |
|
1, 2, and 3 I can agree with. . .although I might move Brady up from 3 and drop Daunte down to 4. |
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 21 (0 members and 21 guests) | |
|