LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 05-19-2006, 08:00 AM   #41
PoideAdelereX

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
314
Senior Member
Default
That was one heck of a throw by Harrington to Roy Williams.

Might like to try that play again.
PoideAdelereX is offline


Old 05-31-2006, 08:00 AM   #42
Amorsesombabs

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
599
Senior Member
Default
Still no definite word on Rogers, just that hes out for the rest of the game. Bly, on the other hand, has ligament damage in his knee. It was just on the radio.
Amorsesombabs is offline


Old 06-16-2006, 08:00 AM   #43
VotsUtegems

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
544
Senior Member
Default
Yes and no.

Looks very good sometimes. Some other times he just seems to disappear. Still wouldn't mind having him on the Pack, though.
VotsUtegems is offline


Old 06-19-2006, 08:00 AM   #44
dasneycomrov

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
Wasn't our team supposed to be all offense and no defense? This is like the twilight zone.
dasneycomrov is offline


Old 06-20-2006, 08:00 AM   #45
Clielldub

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
518
Senior Member
Default
Goes back to being undisciplined, ryno. Terrell was doing the same sh!t last year.


Don't mind playing with passion and fire, but when you do flat out do dumb things like giving the ball to a Lion on the sideline after a big play . . . its inexcusable.

What is the point?
Clielldub is offline


Old 06-29-2006, 08:00 AM   #46
wCYvMKAc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
452
Senior Member
Default
For all you gamblers, taking the line on this game is a no-brainer. Lions win outright, much less getting three.

As for the two rookie playmakers, well there's always the Cowboys from the late 80s, when they went from 1-15 to Super Bowl in a handful of years because of a succession of quality drafts. Irvin in 88, Aikman in 89, Smith in 90, etc.

Of course, that doesn't count because it's Dallas, right?

Jeez. What a maroon.
wCYvMKAc is offline


Old 07-04-2006, 08:00 AM   #47
addyta.org

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
557
Senior Member
Default
"second, we went out and got the best "cover corner" in FA to go with one of the best "playmaking" corners in the league last year."


Of course Vikings fans will argue that THEY got the best "cover corner" in FA to go with one of the best "playmaking" corners in the league last year.
Honestly, I cant see how it could be argued that winfield was the best cover corner available last year. The guy couldnt even hold down a starting corner spot last year with his own team(unless you count the nickle back as a starter).

Don't get me wrong, i think the Vikes did more than enough on defense to give them a legit shot at the division, I just don't think Winfield is as good as people make him out to be. Dont believe me? Just ask some Buffalo fans.
addyta.org is offline


Old 07-06-2006, 08:00 AM   #48
newwebstar

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
491
Senior Member
Default
I dunno, ryno. Considering the area I was going though (Brookfield), for all I know it was hers. Might not have the concept yet of earning what you have.
newwebstar is offline


Old 07-09-2006, 08:00 AM   #49
Kitdowstyhodo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
438
Senior Member
Default
They are saying its the shoulder they are x-raying. He broke his collarbone last year. No updates yet
bummer. good luck.
Kitdowstyhodo is offline


Old 07-10-2006, 08:00 AM   #50
lopezsokero

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
466
Senior Member
Default
Mariucci is damn lucky the Bear didn't win that game.

Dumbest decision making I've ever seen by a head coach in the last quarter of a football game!!!!



BUT ITS A "W" FOR YOURS TRULY!!
lopezsokero is offline


Old 07-12-2006, 08:00 AM   #51
ZZipZZipe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
482
Senior Member
Default
Keep in mind that "ligament damage" is pretty broad. It could be a stretch, could be a strain, could be a pull...

Or it could be a rupture, a partial/full tear...obviously you hope for the former. They aren't going to know this quickly. It's just an easy diagnosis that when a guy can't put weight on a leg and nothing is broken, it's ligament damage.
ZZipZZipe is offline


Old 07-15-2006, 08:00 AM   #52
Tnzxovoz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
With both boards connnected, let the gamethread begin!
Tnzxovoz is offline


Old 07-31-2006, 08:00 AM   #53
obHQNsY2

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
484
Senior Member
Default
Charles Rogers is starting to become the Ki-Jana Carter of wideouts.
obHQNsY2 is offline


Old 08-04-2006, 08:00 AM   #54
Carfanate

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
490
Senior Member
Default
Except the one he let his receiver get absolutely annhialated by Bly.


YIKES!!!!!
Carfanate is offline


Old 08-05-2006, 08:00 AM   #55
KinicsBonee

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
474
Senior Member
Default
holy crap, talk about a slow developing play ! you could have timed that runback with a calender.

LOL


KinicsBonee is offline


Old 08-06-2006, 08:00 AM   #56
lXvtm0ox

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
417
Senior Member
Default
WOW!!!!


If they're not going to call defensive holding on the play going to commercial that Tillman was shown doing, they'll never call it!!!


Jeez, he basically folded, spindled and then mutilated that Lion receiver!!!
do you think the refs were told to turn down the volume on the holding calls?
lXvtm0ox is offline


Old 08-08-2006, 08:00 AM   #57
amberamuletuk

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
363
Senior Member
Default
urlacher makes one hell of an anchor huh?
when he latches on to a runner, the runner slows down quick.
amberamuletuk is offline


Old 08-08-2006, 08:00 AM   #58
NADALA

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
379
Senior Member
Default
While not professing to be a Bear fan, I do keep up with them. As I stated in a post in the Bear forum a couple of days ago, the key to the Bears winning is playing old time Bear football until Grossman gets up to speed.

Running Thomas Jones will, of course, be critical. If they can't, the Bear receivers are just a bunch of names. Terrell really doesn't scare anybody, yet.

If they Lions can put up an early . . . 10 or 13 points, IMO the Bear doesn't have the firepower to rebound from double digit deficits.

Really like the Lions getting 3 here.
NADALA is offline


Old 08-12-2006, 08:00 AM   #59
drugsprevi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
Roy Williams is out of his mind. No way he should have caught that pass. But still what a catch!!!!
that's the kind of catch people remember for a long, long time.
wow
drugsprevi is offline


Old 08-13-2006, 08:00 AM   #60
Peter Hill

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
558
Senior Member
Default
Charles Rogers is starting to become the Ki-Jana Carter of wideouts.
I wouldn't go that far. There are two significant differences between them:

1) Rogers hasn't been around long enough to reach the heights of injury Ki-Jana got to and

2) Nobody saw the injuries coming with Carter. There was no way to really predict that happening. Rogers, on the other hand, SCREAMED injury. From his size, to the medical reports at the Combine that stated looseness in his joints...he had some red flags along the same lines as Snoop Minnis...difference is, Snoop wasn't media hyped, so he fell quite a ways.
Peter Hill is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:06 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity