Now is this a macro? - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**nvideoe** · 04-30-2006, 08:16 PM

If so how good is it?
Taken with a 5MP Panasonic Lunix LZ2 Set @ ISO80

**xsexymasterix** · 04-30-2006, 09:11 PM

Not bad, but you really needed a little more depth of field, as the front of the flower is out of focus.

interesting angle though

**Zmniubqr** · 05-01-2006, 12:08 AM

Cool, reminds me of a couple pictures I just took a few days ago with my D50 + Sigma 70-300mm APO in macro mode

Comments?

Don't mean to hijack [surrender]

**SawbasyWrab** · 05-01-2006, 03:06 AM

I think the definition of macro is that it is larger than life size, but most people have their own definition.

**soonahonsefalh** · 05-01-2006, 07:03 AM

Not bad, but you really needed a little more depth of field, as the front of the flower is out of focus.

interesting angle though

yeah i got pwnt by nats while I was taking that picture

EDIT: forgot to add I only paid $150 for my camera
so does it make the picture that much better? (lol)

**freevideom** · 05-02-2006, 03:09 AM

More Pictures taken today

I think these turned out quite well for a point and shoot camera

Oh and for the record... Lady bugs are NASTY looking [thumbdown]

**arrendabomnem** · 05-02-2006, 04:24 AM

**ChexEcodece** · 05-02-2006, 09:29 PM

04-30-2006, 08:16 PM	#1
nvideoe Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 489 Senior Member	Now is this a macro? If so how good is it? Taken with a 5MP Panasonic Lunix LZ2 Set @ ISO80 Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

04-30-2006, 09:11 PM	#2
xsexymasterix Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 403 Senior Member	Not bad, but you really needed a little more depth of field, as the front of the flower is out of focus. interesting angle though Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

05-01-2006, 12:08 AM	#3
Zmniubqr Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 448 Senior Member	Cool, reminds me of a couple pictures I just took a few days ago with my D50 + Sigma 70-300mm APO in macro mode Comments? Don't mean to hijack [surrender] Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

05-01-2006, 03:06 AM	#4
SawbasyWrab Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 441 Senior Member	I think the definition of macro is that it is larger than life size, but most people have their own definition. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

05-01-2006, 07:03 AM	#5
soonahonsefalh Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 603 Senior Member	Not bad, but you really needed a little more depth of field, as the front of the flower is out of focus. interesting angle though yeah i got pwnt by nats while I was taking that picture EDIT: forgot to add I only paid $150 for my camera so does it make the picture that much better? (lol) Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

05-02-2006, 03:09 AM	#6
freevideom Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 387 Senior Member	More Pictures taken today I think these turned out quite well for a point and shoot camera Oh and for the record... Lady bugs are NASTY looking [thumbdown] Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

05-02-2006, 04:24 AM	#7
arrendabomnem Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 395 Senior Member	Macro? http://student.labra.jypoly.fi/~b7573/pics/Big/IMG_0460.JPG Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

05-02-2006, 09:29 PM	#8
ChexEcodece Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 471 Senior Member	Macro... http://www.peecee.dk/index.php?id=35982&noresize=yes Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)