Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#2 |
|
As far as I am concerned, I read messages and read between the lines of the messages.
As such, I react and express my views based on what is presented here in the posts by a poster and not based on who the poster is. Needless to say, I do frame up a perception about a poster based on his/her views and opinions on varies topics. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
The person who reads the posts = a member.
The person who reads in between the lines = a hair-splitter. The person who reads the poster's mind = a psychologist. The one who does all the three is a genius!!! Our Forum is overflowing with geniuses. As long as they do not cross one another's path, peace prevails. If they cross paths then pandemonium prevails. Like Navagraha - even if they co exist in the same limited space- they make sure not to see, hear, or speak to other such geniuses. When you read posts, do you read between lines or read messages (logic behind) or read poster's minds? This question is just out of curiosity, nothing personal! |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
When you read posts, do you read between lines or read messages (logic behind) or read poster's minds? This question is just out of curiosity, nothing personal! I feel most of us consciously or subconsciously preform all three. When we read a post we are firstly reading the lines,then in between lines and then when all these lines form rail tracks in our head we try to read the posters mind. I feel that's just part of the human psychology. Everyone sorts of tries to size up one and another to a certain extent. But the question remains "did we read everything right to start with?" The mind is one of the toughest book in the world to read cos it doesn't really have pages. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
The most important thing for me is the content....What is the message that is being articulated..
The second important thing in case the content makes sense is the learning out of this.. If a person is emotional & sharing a pain through his message I will not go between the lines to understand what is the significance..I shall take the pain at face value If the person conveys a message which is very logical with a cause & effect relationship I just relish the logic & the message conveyed..Shall not read between the lines I read between the lines when a person is trying to convey a message indirectly -using a metaphor or euphemistically..I admire his intelligence for that.. Sorry...All these are for the first interaction that I have with the person. As soon as we understand the person (may be the person's mask as someone pointed in one of the threads) in this we start relating...Our mind has a fixed image of the person...It's quite difficult to erase it...So we read between the lines to check the message that is being conveyed. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
The most important thing for me is the content....What is the message that is being articulated.. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
The most important thing for me is the content....What is the message that is being articulated.. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|