[softy54534]

God IS above us, below us, beside us, inside us and outside us.
Where is the need for HIM to come down to us?
He is the one who is below us and supporting us!!!

Dear mami, Greetings.

You are contradicting yourself. In your message in post #12 you said "Oh my GOD! Have you been reduced to this state of affairs?"; For that I said God is not reduced, but we are trying to elevate ourselves by discussing about God. In my opinion, Your reply doesn't seem to address my post.

Cheers1

[Lillie_Steins]

Dear mami, Greetings.

You are contradicting yourself. In your message in post #12 you said "Oh my GOD! Have you been reduced to this state of affairs?"; For that I said God is not reduced, but we are trying to elevate ourselves by discussing about God. In my opinion, Your reply doesn't seem to address my post.

Cheers1

Highlighted line means "Is your existence to be proved by a ballot system?"
Neither is God reduced not are we elevated. We live in the same plane inseparably!
I think now you will agree that I have replied to your point.

[Peptobismol]

False choices ..Assumes a model ; does not offer the choice of 'none of the above' ... cannot vote!

[TorryJens]

hi arun
i voted for strong......still can't define like science/mathmatics.....like ' neti/ neti" theory....u heard this theory....means this is

not....this is not....i think renu can explain much more abt neti neti theory....

[Slonopotam845]

.i think renu can explain much more abt neti neti theory....

Hoi TBS garu,

Who is the one with the Phd in Advaita?

You explain lah.

[softy54534]

Hoi TBS garu,

Who is the one with the Phd in Advaita?

You explain lah.

hi renu,
u can explain neti neti theory as scientific /medicaly....just as tablet/syrup for a patient lahhh...

[Beerinkol]

hi renu,
u can explain neti neti theory as scientific /medicaly....just as tablet/syrup for a patient lahhh...

Ok first we have to explain what is the meaning of Neti Neti.

Neti is a Guna Sandhi upon breaking down =Na(Not) Iti(This).

So I applied Neti Neti theory and did not vote in this poll.

Do we really need to vote to prove there is God?

[tgs]

Glad to see that 'God' is able to pull our Sangam Sir into this thread!!

[MannoFr]

Sowbagyavathy VR, Greetings.

God is not reduced. We people are elevated when discussing about God in a sensible discussion. This is one easy way to elevate ourselves. Even God has to come my level if IGod cares for me, if popular belief is to be believed. We all can't become jnanis for God to take notice of us.

Cheers!

Interesting

[Drugmachine]

Dear Arun ji,

Is this you?

Arun Shanker | Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture - Academia.edu

[Big A]

Highlighted line means "Is your existence to be proved by a ballot system?"

The poll is not to prove the existence of God. The poll is to know what people think of God, from your posts I have got an idea

[TorryJens]

Dear Arun ji,

Is this you?

Arun Shanker | Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture - Academia.edu

Yes it is me
other links of mine are
WEB Home: Plant Physiology
Publication List : Arun K. Shanker - Publications List
Please call me Arun I am just Arun to friends
and all in this forum are my friends

[Slonopotam845]

Si. Arun shankar, Greetings.

I did not take part in the poll. Not enough options. I believe in myself 100%. I know there is an universal energy; it's every where. I know I am connected to that energy. I know I have no faith in God. But I don't have enough choices in that poll.


Cheers!

Thanks I will think of a choice to suit your thinking

[Peptobismol]

The poll is not to prove the existence of God. The poll is to know what people think of God, from your posts I have got an idea

All these years I have never really had any opinion of God.

God is just God that's all.

What can we really think of Him?

We are limiting God by having an opinion of Him.

What opinion can we really have?

The only "opinion" we can have is just Sat Cit Ananda..that too simplified just to make the human mind grasp a concept.

[Beerinkol]

Dear Arun ji,

Is this you?

Arun Shanker | Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture - Academia.edu

I have listed my home page in my profile in this forum
http://www.tamilbrahmins.com/member.php?u=4478

[Beerinkol]

I have listed my home page in my profile in this forum
http://www.tamilbrahmins.com/member.php?u=4478

Ok since you a research scientist in the field of agriculture I have a question for you.

When you look at a seed of a plant..can you see a tree in it right away?

You can not isn't it?

It has to have the suitable environment and nourishing factors in order to develop into a tall tree.

So same with God..we can't see him with our senses.

[Peptobismol]

Ok since you a research scientist in the field of agriculture I have a question for you.

When you look at a seed of a plant..can you see a tree in it right away?

You can not isn't it?

It has to have the suitable environment and nourishing factors in order to develop into a tall tree.

So same with God..we can't see him with our senses.

How illogical can you get
Try to be a little meaningful and anyway this in not the thread the thread is God Exists

[Ifroham4]

How illogical can you get
Try to be a little meaningful and anyway this in not the thread the thread is God Exists

Hey what illogical yaar...from seed comes tree..tree lies latent in seed..but you can not see the tree in seed.

Makes sense right?

Why do I have a feeling I am starting to sound like TBS garu?

[Paul Bunyan]

Hey what illogical yaar...from seed comes tree..tree lies latent in seed..but you can not see the tree in seed.

Makes sense right?

Why do I have a feeling I am starting to sound like TBS garu?

Does not make sense very very illogical
It is not tree or seed we are talking about here
the other thread was Gravity, America here it is tree, seed how irrelevant can you get
Please see what the thread is about
in fact you have said "we can't see him with our senses"
that is what exactly I am tell
I agree with that totally

[NeroASERCH]

Ok since you a research scientist in the field of agriculture I have a question for you.

When you look at a seed of a plant..can you see a tree in it right away?

You can not isn't it?

It has to have the suitable environment and nourishing factors in order to develop into a tall tree.

So same with God..we can't see him with our senses.

This is a classical case of irrelevant analogy
While an analogy is a useful means of explanation, it does not constitute proof. Argument by analogy tends to evoke a predictable emotional response because it is usually based on accepted symbolism; Remember, what is true of one thing in one set of circumstances is not necessarily true of another thing in another set of circumstances. By drawing analogies, you are manipulating the reader into thinking about the comparison rather than the original subject. Use analogy to clarify or enhance your argument but do not deceive yourself into thinking that you are proving it.