Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
1. The sanskrit is not a language created by the god, the sanskrit is not at all a language. Can u brief me on the connection between the first line and the second line ! |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
Hello everybody, We also must bear in mind that most writers and poets in Sanskrit apaarently were not Brahmanas. Vethavyasan (Mahabharatha) was of ftraditionally fisherman profression. Vaalmiki was an Athivasi.(hunter). Researchers say many of the veda composers were also not BrahmaNa. The connection between Br and Sans is that Sanskirt is their "working" language when they perform the priestly job. Even Kamban who translated Ramayana from Sans to Tamiz was no BrahmaNa. People of other religions such as Jains and Bhuddists had/have also used Sanskrit (or some related language) It is just a language there for anybody who wants to use it. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
why many researchers use proto-dravidian instead of tamil. Because they know tamil is the oldest language, so they use the word proto-dravidian and tell that all the four southern indian language are derived from that. But the truth is tamil is the root language of all other south indian languages.The proto-dravidian is nothing but tamil. Also they tell malayalam is derived from proto tamil-malayalam(The point i strongly oppose).I think malayalam is formed by mixing the sanskrit with tamil. I tell tamil is the oldest language in the world. The sanskrit is not a language created by the god, the sanskrit is not at all a language. if it is a language ,why the sanskrit is not spoken by many of the brahmins.In tamilnadu,most of the brahmins speak tamil.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
I dont know whether you are Sircastic or not but I mean it...What is the very connection between Brahmanas and Samskrutham? As a language it is NOT a property of one sect........ ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() iam just curious, being tamil and living in a country far way from india and eelam i only know a very little of tamil! and sorry again, i didnt mean anything! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() iam just curious, being tamil and living in a country far way from india and eelam i only know a very little of tamil! and sorry again, i didnt mean anything! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
Hello everybody,
I just want to share with you what I know about Sanskrit. Please correct me, if I am not right. Sanskrit is not a language spoken by anybody, but it is developed by Odhuvar or priests for praising God, and pronouncing Mandhirangal(Manthras) two millennium ago. Odhuvar were those who involved only in conducting Sacred rituals in Daily Poosai(Pooja) and pronouncing Mandhirangal(Manthras). Only Odhuvar knew Sanskrit and they used only in Temple for pronouncing Mandhirangal (Manthras). In day to day life, Odhuvar spoke tamizh. After some period, Odhuvar claimed that Sanskrit was Language of God. Odhuvar became Brahmin, who are still conducting rituals in temple and pronouncing Mandhirangal (Manthras). New information - Few days back, Kalaingar announced that anybody can become Archagar(priest). I appreciate his move. on this. I also read that Brahmins opposed this. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
Crazy,
Tamil 'Nadu' is really a hypocrisy.. Nadu means country.. But it is an indian state ! Tamil Nadu will be very developped if it was not an indian state ! TN contribuate to develop the other states ! If GOSL and SLA continue this daily killing of Tamil people in NE of Sri lanka, Eelam will be the first modern tamil country.. (www.tamilnet.com to follow this slow genocide, by example http://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=18447) |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
Crazy, God bless us, it will be the very first tamil country! ![]() iam waiting for that wonderful day! |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
Tamil 'Nadu' is really a hypocrisy.. Tamil Nadu will be very developped if it was not an indian state ! But it is a funny thing. In the early 1950s Tamils in Tamil Nadu wanted to break away from India. This was considered one of the biggest threats to Indian unity then. In Sri Lanka at that time, Jaffna Tamils thought Chelvanayagam was being unnecessarily quarrelsome when he asked even for federalism. As it turned out, we in Tamil Nadu received more concessions from India than we had thought we would (even today, TN is the only state to which the Official Languages Order does not apply). It was exactly the opposite for you in Sri Lanka. At that time, I don't think anyone would have thought that it would end up like this. Seri pa, enough seriousness from me. |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
Thanks podalangai for your reaction.
For me Nadu does mean country and not a 'idam' or place. By chance Tamil's struggle in Sri lanka helped Tamils in India to get the respect of India, unfortunately it is still not the case for us.. Now Tamils of India must help Sri lankan tamil to obtain a federal system or a separate state if federalism is not possible with this chauvinist govt. TN is the richest state i think. It is a state which produce richness. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|