LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 11-01-2005, 08:00 AM   #1
MannoFr

Join Date
Mar 2007
Posts
4,451
Senior Member
Default
1. The sanskrit is not a language created by the god, the sanskrit is not at all a language.

2. if it is a language ,why the sanskrit is not spoken by many of the brahmins.In tamilnadu,most of the brahmins speak tamil.
Vanakkam Thamizh

Can u brief me on the connection between the first line and the second line !
MannoFr is offline


Old 11-24-2005, 08:00 AM   #2
Drugmachine

Join Date
Apr 2006
Posts
4,490
Senior Member
Default
Ok Badri, sorry.

It's why i asked to stop this discussion here.
Drugmachine is offline


Old 03-09-2006, 08:00 AM   #3
softy54534

Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
5,457
Senior Member
Default
Hello everybody,

I just want to share with you what I know about Sanskrit. Please correct me, if I am not right.

Sanskrit is not a language spoken by anybody, but it is developed by Odhuvar or priests for praising God, and pronouncing Mandhirangal(Manthras) two millennium ago. Odhuvar were those who involved only in conducting Sacred rituals in Daily Poosai(Pooja) and pronouncing Mandhirangal(Manthras).

Only Odhuvar knew Sanskrit and they used only in Temple for pronouncing Mandhirangal (Manthras). In day to day life, Odhuvar spoke tamizh.

After some period, Odhuvar claimed that Sanskrit was Language of God.

Odhuvar became Brahmin, who are still conducting rituals in temple and pronouncing Mandhirangal (Manthras).

New information - Few days back, Kalaingar announced that anybody can become Archagar(priest). I appreciate his move. on this. I also read that Brahmins opposed this.


We also must bear in mind that most writers and poets in Sanskrit apaarently were not Brahmanas. Vethavyasan (Mahabharatha) was of ftraditionally fisherman profression. Vaalmiki was an Athivasi.(hunter).
Researchers say many of the veda composers were also not BrahmaNa.
The connection between Br and Sans is that Sanskirt is their "working" language when they perform the priestly job. Even Kamban who translated Ramayana from Sans to Tamiz was no BrahmaNa.

People of other religions such as Jains and Bhuddists had/have also used Sanskrit (or some related language)

It is just a language there for anybody who wants to use it.
softy54534 is offline


Old 05-29-2006, 05:20 PM   #4
Beerinkol

Join Date
Dec 2006
Posts
5,268
Senior Member
Default why many researchers use proto-dravidian instead of tamil
why many researchers use proto-dravidian instead of tamil. Because they know tamil is the oldest language, so they use the word proto-dravidian and tell that all the four southern indian language are derived from that. But the truth is tamil is the root language of all other south indian languages.The proto-dravidian is nothing but tamil. Also they tell malayalam is derived from proto tamil-malayalam(The point i strongly oppose).I think malayalam is formed by mixing the sanskrit with tamil. I tell tamil is the oldest language in the world. The sanskrit is not a language created by the god, the sanskrit is not at all a language. if it is a language ,why the sanskrit is not spoken by many of the brahmins.In tamilnadu,most of the brahmins speak tamil.
Beerinkol is offline


Old 05-31-2006, 02:22 AM   #5
HedgeYourBets

Join Date
Aug 2008
Posts
4,655
Senior Member
Default
............why the sanskrit is not spoken by many of the brahmins.In tamilnadu,most of the brahmins speak tamil.
what is connection between Brahmanas and Samskrutham..pls explain
HedgeYourBets is offline


Old 05-31-2006, 03:23 AM   #6
Slonopotam845

Join Date
Jan 2006
Posts
5,251
Senior Member
Default
Originally Posted by maduraithamizhmanikandan ............why the sanskrit is not spoken by many of the brahmins.In tamilnadu,most of the brahmins speak tamil.
what is connection between Brahmanas and Samskrutham..pls explain Wow! srivatsan, I think this is the best question so far asked in this forum by anyone. You should be commended for it!! I would await the answer!
Slonopotam845 is offline


Old 05-31-2006, 04:08 AM   #7
S.T.D.

Join Date
May 2008
Age
42
Posts
5,220
Senior Member
Default
Originally Posted by srivatsan Originally Posted by maduraithamizhmanikandan ............why the sanskrit is not spoken by many of the brahmins.In tamilnadu,most of the brahmins speak tamil.
what is connection between Brahmanas and Samskrutham..pls explain Wow! srivatsan, I think this is the best question so far asked in this forum by anyone. You should be commended for it!! I would await the answer! Ms. Sivamala,

I dont know whether you are Sircastic or not but I mean it...What is the very connection between Brahmanas and Samskrutham? As a language it is NOT a property of one sect........
S.T.D. is offline


Old 05-31-2006, 04:37 AM   #8
softy54534

Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
5,457
Senior Member
Default
Ms. Sivamala,

I dont know whether you are Sircastic or not but I mean it...What is the very connection between Brahmanas and Samskrutham? As a language it is NOT a property of one sect........ Smile
No, I really mean to compliment you!! Keep it up.
softy54534 is offline


Old 06-01-2006, 01:59 AM   #9
Peptobismol

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
58
Posts
4,386
Senior Member
Default
hm yaarachum therincha answer pannungalen. iam waiting!
Peptobismol is offline


Old 06-01-2006, 03:03 AM   #10
Beerinkol

Join Date
Dec 2006
Posts
5,268
Senior Member
Default
hm yaarachum therincha answer pannungalen. iam waiting!
Crazy....i like your post!
Beerinkol is offline


Old 06-01-2006, 03:08 AM   #11
TorryJens

Join Date
Nov 2008
Posts
4,494
Senior Member
Default
Originally Posted by crazy hm yaarachum therincha answer pannungalen. iam waiting!
Crazy....i like your post! iam extremely sorry, did i say anything wrong?
iam just curious, being tamil and living in a country far way from india and eelam i only know a very little of tamil!

and sorry again, i didnt mean anything! i just wanted someone to answer!
TorryJens is offline


Old 06-01-2006, 07:39 AM   #12
Big A

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
50
Posts
4,148
Administrator
Default
Originally Posted by srivatsan Originally Posted by crazy hm yaarachum therincha answer pannungalen. iam waiting!
Crazy....i like your post! iam extremely sorry, did i say anything wrong?
iam just curious, being tamil and living in a country far way from india and eelam i only know a very little of tamil!

and sorry again, i didnt mean anything! i just wanted someone to answer! hey no..no..it was very funny, I remembered a Vivek's dialogue!
Big A is offline


Old 06-09-2006, 02:39 AM   #13
9mm_fan

Join Date
May 2007
Age
53
Posts
5,191
Senior Member
Default
Hello everybody,

I just want to share with you what I know about Sanskrit. Please correct me, if I am not right.

Sanskrit is not a language spoken by anybody, but it is developed by Odhuvar or priests for praising God, and pronouncing Mandhirangal(Manthras) two millennium ago. Odhuvar were those who involved only in conducting Sacred rituals in Daily Poosai(Pooja) and pronouncing Mandhirangal(Manthras).

Only Odhuvar knew Sanskrit and they used only in Temple for pronouncing Mandhirangal (Manthras). In day to day life, Odhuvar spoke tamizh.

After some period, Odhuvar claimed that Sanskrit was Language of God.

Odhuvar became Brahmin, who are still conducting rituals in temple and pronouncing Mandhirangal (Manthras).

New information - Few days back, Kalaingar announced that anybody can become Archagar(priest). I appreciate his move. on this. I also read that Brahmins opposed this.
9mm_fan is offline


Old 06-09-2006, 08:05 PM   #14
brraverishhh

Join Date
Jan 2006
Posts
5,127
Senior Member
Default
Tamizhs are everywhere in the world. But there is no country for Tamizhs
brraverishhh is offline


Old 06-10-2006, 12:06 AM   #15
Raj_Copi_Jin

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
48
Posts
4,533
Senior Member
Default
Crazy,

Tamil 'Nadu' is really a hypocrisy..
Nadu means country.. But it is an indian state !
Tamil Nadu will be very developped if it was not an indian state !
TN contribuate to develop the other states !

If GOSL and SLA continue this daily killing of Tamil people in NE of Sri lanka, Eelam will be the first modern tamil country..

(www.tamilnet.com to follow this slow genocide, by example http://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=18447)
Raj_Copi_Jin is offline


Old 06-10-2006, 12:10 AM   #16
Lt_Apple

Join Date
Dec 2008
Posts
4,489
Senior Member
Default
Crazy,

Tamil 'Nadu' is really a hypocrisy..
Nadu means country.. But it is an indian state
!

If GOSL and SLA continue this daily killing of Tamil people in NE of Sri lanka, Eelam will be the first and modern tamil country..

(www.tamilnet.com to follow this slow genocide)
i know that!

God bless us, it will be the very first tamil country!
iam waiting for that wonderful day!
Lt_Apple is offline


Old 06-10-2006, 12:15 AM   #17
PhillipHer

Join Date
Jun 2008
Age
58
Posts
4,481
Senior Member
Default
Yes Crazy God bless us .
PhillipHer is offline


Old 06-10-2006, 12:21 AM   #18
9mm_fan

Join Date
May 2007
Age
53
Posts
5,191
Senior Member
Default
Yes Crazy God bless us .
9mm_fan is offline


Old 06-10-2006, 09:47 AM   #19
PhillipHer

Join Date
Jun 2008
Age
58
Posts
4,481
Senior Member
Default
Tamil 'Nadu' is really a hypocrisy..
Nadu means country.. But it is an indian state !
Adeyappa! "Nadu" does not have to mean independent country. It can also simply mean "idam", or even "ulakam". For us Indian Tamils, Tamil Nadu *is* our thaaynaadu in a very deep way. Fortunately, we do not have to choose between our Tamil thaay and India. There is no contradiction in our naadu being a part of India, because it still belongs to us.

Tamil Nadu will be very developped if it was not an indian state !
TN contribuate to develop the other states !
We contribute much more than even most Tamils realise. But think how many thousands of our youth would have died if we had had to fight India. After the events of the 1960s (and particularly the DMK's election gains in 1962), India has treated us with respect and honour. What would we have gained through the fight? Money is not worth so much.

But it is a funny thing. In the early 1950s Tamils in Tamil Nadu wanted to break away from India. This was considered one of the biggest threats to Indian unity then. In Sri Lanka at that time, Jaffna Tamils thought Chelvanayagam was being unnecessarily quarrelsome when he asked even for federalism. As it turned out, we in Tamil Nadu received more concessions from India than we had thought we would (even today, TN is the only state to which the Official Languages Order does not apply). It was exactly the opposite for you in Sri Lanka. At that time, I don't think anyone would have thought that it would end up like this.

Seri pa, enough seriousness from me.
PhillipHer is offline


Old 06-11-2006, 12:05 AM   #20
brraverishhh

Join Date
Jan 2006
Posts
5,127
Senior Member
Default
Thanks podalangai for your reaction.

For me Nadu does mean country and not a 'idam' or place.
By chance Tamil's struggle in Sri lanka helped Tamils in India to get the respect of India, unfortunately it is still not the case for us..

Now Tamils of India must help Sri lankan tamil to obtain a federal system or a separate state if federalism is not possible with this chauvinist govt.

TN is the richest state i think. It is a state which produce richness.
brraverishhh is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:54 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity