Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
All are fakers! I expect early elections to be called to bring in more [COLOR="#FF0000]"" qualified " characters [/COLOR]to appease a more informed public . |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
[QUOTE=sleaguepunter;1162501]
How true! |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
I don't really know how much you can read into this cabinet reshuffle.
One thing is that arts is now divorced from information and communication. That is one interesting thing: why was arts lumped together with information in the first place? Unless the only thing they know about the arts is how to censor it, and nothing else. Then the other main issue is that MCYS is split into two. One that deals with family issues (ie forcing Singaporeans to have more children) and another that deals with "fixing" the xenophobia problem. How the ministers are reshuffled after just one year - and we do have a lot of inexperienced ministers in charge - I don't think it's a reflection of who's on the up or not. You can always read it as CCS having part of his portfolio cut away, or you can read it as he's managed a reorganisation after just one year in charge - no mean feat. |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
Scroobal, I read the situation differently.
MoM is potentially going to be hot seat, given the general unhappiness over flood of new immigrants. Public anger will be partially directed at MoM if number of new immigrants continue to increase, which I think will continue to be the case. Hence by putting TCJ in this hot seat, the PM is "risking" TCJ's career. This would normally not be done if the purpose is to line TCJ up for the most important post. The new MSF is going to be the main body to dole out welfare goodies. This will make Kee Chiu look good in the eyes of public. We can envisage that PAP will be a lot more generous in giving out welfare support in the coming decades. Will not be surprise if in 10 years' time, the new MSF budget runs into billions, matching even that for education. I think with the latest changes, the decision remains for Kee Chiu to ascent, potentially to the highest post. PS. I have heard murmurs in the Army on TCJ's attitude towards lower beings. If what I heard is true, then I will rather have Kee Chiu in the higher post. |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
Scroobal, I read the situation differently. |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
Up yours fat reservist A guardsman is superior to an infantryman, OK? Nobody is taking that away from guardsmen. However, an infantry general is probably a bigger post than a guards general for the following reasons: 1. The infantry corps is larger than the guards 2. The job of a general is not to win battles. The job of a general is 90% to maintain supply routes and equip your men, and 10% military strategy. This is a larger job for the infantry. 3. The job of the infantry is not only to fight wars, but to hold ground. As you have learnt from the Iraq war, holding ground is actually the trickiest part of the war. This means that you not only have to be a warrior, you also have to be a politician. 4. The infantry is also the end user for a lot of the support arms, and they are subordinate to the infantry. ie the infantry is usually telling artillery, signals, air defence, etc what to do rather than the other way around. |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
|
PS. I have heard murmurs in the Army on TCJ's attitude towards lower beings. If what I heard is true, then I will rather have Kee Chiu in the higher post. More importantly, they have spent their lives in bureaucracies which present peoples lives as a whole stack of numbers. A process which dehumanizes and disconnects the masses from you. Eventually, the irony will be on the Old Man again. The model of scholar officials, already proven to be systematically flawed by thousands of years of running a similar system in China, disproven yet again in Singapore. |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
|
Well, to be frank, I would not trust either of them to be able to identify with the lower rungs of society. Even if they have studied overseas, I doubt they have significant exposure to various philosophies (be it western liberal values or eastern philosophies like Buddhism, etc) which expound egalitarianism, etc. is there a better way other than the scholar system for the civil service? Ultimately some will be the leaders, while others have to be clerks, cooks, cleaners etc. I would rather have scholars over people born with silver spoon who got to top position because of their parents or because they are willing to spread their legs or bent over. |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
Scroobal, I read the situation differently. If being sensitive to the situation of the lower rungs is what is required at the very top, maybe a woman would be a more appropriate choice. |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
|
换汤不换药。until the citizens ain't treated as economic digits, things will remain pretty much the same They are many good people who just missed out on a scholarship for the smallest of reasons. Whether they have a scholar background matters less than the street-smartness that comes with recognising the right priorities and the relative importance of different situations. Definitely staying too long in a sheltered and cosseted environment is not a plus point for a leader of people. |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
|
If TCJ is to be risked or sacrificed, why bring him in in the first place. I believe we have to assume all are put there to test their potentials in those areas. TCJ does seem to be given the "harder" responsibilities and CCS, the "softer" tasks. Here "harder" does not mean "more difficult". "Harder" here requires greater technical skill while "softer" needs the human touch. On the other hand, TCJ is given a no-thanks job. MoM's is to manage the shit created by open door policy. And recent news will indicate to you that this govt will continue to keep the door wide open. They probably calculated that to reverse the immigrant policy now is more detrimental to their vote share in 2016 as the property market will tank, thereby angering the middle ground. So MoM will continue to be used to "manage" a bad situation, and there is very little TCJ can do as the policy is set in the PMO, not in MoM. The familee likes loyalty and compliance, not a charismatic leader that TCJ is positioning himself to be. That's why woody was chosen amongst his peers, not OTC, Dhana or Tony. In this way the familee has certain level of control behind the scene. TCJ may even be seen as a threat, just like Bo Xilai. |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
|
换汤不换药 In the meantime, we should do our best to support the emergence of a stronger alternative party, so that we can have a 2-party system of government. Good thing that old man is expiring soon. His one-man show since the late 1980s has really pushed the country too much to the conservative side. |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
|
The PAP is frantically trying to renew its ranks. LHL's gambit in reducing the number of Ministers obviously has led to an overload. Both DPMs took on heavyweight Ministries while "mentoring" newbies. Tharman needs to focus on MOF...Chee Hian needs to clean up MHA. K.Shanmugam cannot relate to the Chinese officials and with the departure of Chin Siat Yoon as Ambassador to China and Chan Heng Chee from the United States, things may just fall apart. Vivian is likely being reserved to take over MTI once Lim Hng Kiang announces his retirement next year. Grace will then helm MEWR alone.
Tan Chuan Jin will probably be just like Gan Kim Yong...talk alot, stay away from controversy and ask everyone to go for trg, trg and more trg and quietly endorse issuance of 3rd casino license if economy takes a dive. Josephine Teo will be slated to take over from Swee Say since the 'chosen one' didnt get to be anointed by the electorate. Bottomline...LHL is getting worried. And if the newbies brought in by GCT and LKY don't measure-up, he will have no choice but to even sack some of the newbie Ministers and show that he is still a task-master, just like his dad. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|