Reply to Thread New Thread |
12-08-2005, 08:00 AM | #1 |
|
|
|
12-09-2005, 08:00 AM | #2 |
|
|
|
12-31-2005, 08:00 AM | #3 |
|
|
|
01-23-2006, 08:00 AM | #4 |
|
Betti, I'll try to answer you as best I can. Field Marshall Piiboon Songkhram's early days of being the Prime Minister of Thailand is a tad before my time but I remember my family talked about the changes that were mandated from the government. Their reaction was that they wanted to comply because it was a nationalistic and patriotic thing to do and of course you want to be civilized. I don't think there's any harsh punishment for not dressing properly, at least in the countryside as I remember old ladies were still wearing a top undergarment (เสื้อชั้นในตัวเดียว)in the house. Of course they did not wear them outside the house, going to the market for example would be a no no. In the capital of Bangkok there might be harsher punishment than just being branded as a non civilized person or not patriotic. I remember also my aunt who had a fabric shop in town had to change the spelling of her shop sign to the more 'modern' spelling. I wish I could remember what letters had to be changed because I remember seeing the old sign that was taken down tucked away in a store room. Not much of an answer, I am afraid.
|
|
03-13-2006, 08:00 AM | #6 |
|
Below is an excerpt from Thailand's Political History by B.J. Terwiel.
"Up till 1913 most Siamese were known only by their personal name, often a monosyllabic 'nickname', but mostly among the prosperous, a pleasant-sounding polysyllabic 'real name'. Both 'nickname' and 'real name' referred to the individual and it was impossible to decide from these names who was related to whom. Family names had long been in use, but generally only by the phudi, people of rank and refinement. There were signs that the number of people adopting surnames had been steadily increasing, but they remained limited to those who had distinguished themselves somehow and had achieved a measure of wealth and influence. In the 1913 decree, it was stipulated that all heads of families were given six months from 1 July in which to choose and register their surnames. The king, who was of no mean literary talent, devised lists of well-sounding names from which the populace might choose." |
|
04-29-2006, 08:00 AM | #7 |
|
Dear DogoDon ,
Just for left some clearify for you here ( As I'm about to go outside in soon at this moment) So! here goes; - wear a cap or โมกหัว (not sure about this!) This phrass is "โพกหัว" not " โมกหัว " โพก = wrap a piece of cloth aro โพกหัว = [ V ] wrap ; put on a turban ; wrap a piece of cloth around one's head ; cover the head with a cloth - carry things on your head (I don't understand ทุน here) it's " ทูน " not " ทุน " ทูนหัว = [ V ] carry over the head ; uplift |
|
05-04-2006, 08:00 AM | #8 |
|
oh yes, very much of an answer! thank you. Yes the fabric shop was good for her in those days. My aunt had many stories to tell. She had now been diseased for many years but she kept the shop running way into her 70's. |
|
05-31-2006, 08:00 AM | #9 |
|
|
|
06-26-2006, 08:00 AM | #10 |
|
Fascinating! Thanks Richard.
If I may attempt a rough translation: Those who dress like this are not civilized Thais: Don't - wear sarongs - expose your upper body - shave your head - wear a cap or โมกหัว (not sure about this!) - wear a bandeau (or like a bikini) top (ผ้าแถบคาดอก) - wear a one-piece undershirt (? I'm not sure about this) - carry things on your head (I don't understand ทุน here) Civilized Thais dress like this: You should - dress in western style or wear Thai style short pants - (illegible part) - keep long hair that is worn down clean and neat (?) - wear a pha sin (pha thung) (i.e., a sarong-like lower-body garment worn by women) A couple of interesting points in spelling here: Am I wrong in thinking that the word สวม (to wear) used to be spelled สรวม ? It appears that way, from this article. Was it also pronounced differently? Also, it appears that ผ้าซิ่น used to be spelled (or maybe still can be spelled) ผ้าสิ้น. Well, I find it interesting, at least! I'd appreciate it if someone could correct my mistakes and fill in what I missed. Thanks! DogoDon |
|
07-18-2006, 08:00 AM | #11 |
|
|
|
07-30-2006, 08:00 AM | #12 |
|
Umm, not really! I understand that เสี้อชั้นใน is an undergarment, but I don't understand exactly what they are suggesting should not be worn. Is it a particular type of undergarment they are talking about, or are they saying that you should not wear only one undergarment? That is, are they saying that you should wear both underpants and an undershirt (or bra, for a lady)? |
|
10-01-2006, 08:00 AM | #14 |
|
DogoDon |
|
09-21-2012, 09:39 AM | #16 |
|
A picture showing Thais how to dress properly The process of "Nation Building" began under King Rama V (reign 1868-1910) and gained momentum under King Rama VI (reign 1910-25). Nationalism reached its apex under Field Marshal Pibulsonggram (P.M. 1938-44). His National Socialist regime produced a State Edict in 1939, proclaiming that the country was henceforth to be called "Thailand" in accordance with its racial pure "Thai" inhabitants who were genetically superior to other "lesser breeds". Under this Edict, those who conformed to the ideals of the dictatorship were pronounced "racially pure Thais". Those who resisted and attempted to preserve their cultural identity became, at best, second class citizens. Continued at thai-blogs.com >>> This picture comes from a new exhibition at the Museum of Siam in Bangkok. |
|
09-21-2012, 09:29 PM | #17 |
|
|
|
09-22-2012, 12:35 AM | #18 |
|
Well it looks like Thai's were not all that conservative about exposing there bodies in the old day's, Covering up must be a more modern phenomena, but now with the bikini, there starting to revert back to there old fashioned roots. Is the picture to the left the old "no no" and the picture to the right the new way u were supposed to dress? |
|
09-22-2012, 06:50 AM | #19 |
|
|
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|