Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
There are two components of fencing and kendo that are the same.
1. Both are martial arts involving a sword fighting. 2. Both have beginners who buy the most expensive equipment possible to be a big-fat show-off and get ticked-off when they lose because they suck and wished that their superior equipment would have helped in winning. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
Kendo by nature has much less stategic development than Fencing. The rules of Kendo do not allow for the development of distance for the purpose of timing techniques such as stop hits, feints, retreating in order to draw your opponent in closer for a quick reversal and attack. I don't understand the distinction that you are trying to make. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
I've done some of the shinai vs. sabre type of game. Our olympic style fencing club has developed "electric kendo" with european fencing rules. I personally hooked up in full electric sabre kit with electric shinai and went against my best sabre student and got shreded. Superior footwork and a light as a whip sabre did me in. So what do you guys think of "electric kendo?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
I saw someone with a "kendo vs fencing" picture and it seemed rather interesting to me.
I was wondering who do YOU think would win? Heres what ive got so far.. Fencing Pros: 1. lighter, more flexible sabre, allowing attack from unexpected angles. Kendo Pros: 1. More damage potential. 2. heavier shinai wouldnt be blockable with the flimsy sabre. There was an article online i saw about "Samurai vs. Ranaissance Rapierist" That gave me some more insights into benefits and pitfalls of both sides... your opinions?? |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
Kendo does not utilise space that much. Both arts depend on distance and timing: while the weapons and the rules create variables that defy reasonable comparison. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
I have both fenced and I practice kendo. The distinction I am trying to make would be hard to understand by anyone who has not fenced. Kendo of course has nuki waza and uses a lot of timing. Kendo however has very specific rules about how a target should be hit. In fencing points are scored regardless of whether the technique is delivered in good form with all the concerns that kendo has. I will give an example to try to clarify my point. In kendo one never really backs up beyond maybe a step, in fencing you may retreat many steps. This retreat could vary in speed and gait to throw off your opponents timing or sense of distance. This could be used to execute a stop thrust. This ideally is performed in the middle of the beat of your opponents rhythym to strike the opponent in mid step when he can neither attack or defend. Their are many techniques in fencing that utilise this sense of space. Kendo does not utilise space that much.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
I have both fenced and I practice kendo. The distinction I am trying to make would be hard to understand by anyone who has not fenced. Kendo of course has nuki waza and uses a lot of timing. Kendo however has very specific rules about how a target should be hit. In fencing points are scored regardless of whether the technique is delivered in good form with all the concerns that kendo has. I will give an example to try to clarify my point. In kendo one never really backs up beyond maybe a step, in fencing you may retreat many steps. This retreat could vary in speed and gait to throw off your opponents timing or sense of distance. This could be used to execute a stop thrust. This ideally is performed in the middle of the beat of your opponents rhythym to strike the opponent in mid step when he can neither attack or defend. Their are many techniques in fencing that utilise this sense of space. Kendo does not utilise space that much. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
It is truly difficult to compare Fencing and Kendo. They are both Martial Sports but they play by different rules. Kendo by nature has much less stategic development than Fencing. The rules of Kendo do not allow for the development of distance for the purpose of timing techniques such as stop hits, feints, retreating in order to draw your opponent in closer for a quick reversal and attack. On the other hand Kendo has much more technical precision, aggressiveness, body contact. The question is whose set of rules would we play by. Clearly, if by Kendo rules the Fencer wouldn't have a chance. Fencing rules would clearly favor the Fencer. If the Kendoka forgot his perfect Kendo and played a little more like Kenjutsu, not worrying about following through or striking only selected targets, then it could go either way. I believe against a sabre Fencer the Kendoka would be a clear favorite. Against the epee or foil Fencer the Kendoka would be an underdog. An epee or a foil is a very fast point thrust weapon which attack in ways unfamiliar to Kendo. The epee has the hand as one of its prime targets it would be difficult for a Kendoka to protect his hands from attack. To make statements such as 1 DO strike would end it is a bit foolish, wouldn't both participants be wearing proper protection against their opponents weapon. If not, then the Kendoka may be beyond the need of an ambulance when an epee thrust is delivered to his eye straight through the wide grates of his Men. A fencing mask is made to prevent this and the face is a valid target in epee fencing. In many ways this is like asking the old question; Who would win a Wrestler or a Boxer?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
yeah i agree its hard to compare the two, when talking about two arts its hard to say completely one is superior over the other. Hey but its kendo vs fencing, of course we would own those bouncing fags, they should join ballet. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|