Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
Teacher's ranks is a good indicator of quality/progress of Kendo in a country (outside Japan and Korea). There are only a few countries that can have 7-dan sensei and even in those, lower ranked teachers are still (somewhat) common.
This is a good follow-up from the one the OP did years ago. Unfortunatly my situation remains the same: sensei is still 7-dan, though he tried for 8-dan earlier this year. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
Teacher's ranks is a good indicator of quality/progress of Kendo in a country (outside Japan and Korea). There are only a few countries that can have 7-dan sensei and even in those, lower ranked teachers are still (somewhat) common. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
To be fair, you'd have to make separate threads for each area... I mean, I voted for 7-dan, but I also live in Japan, which I imagine would skew the statistics a little. It also means nothing without further comments, like yours saying you're in Japan and voted as such. Numbers and results need explaining. If 100% of people voted "hachidan" we would look for an answer (maybe all voters are from the Keishicho). If we see 80% of people saying their sensei is below 3-dan, we need an answer for that too; nevertheless we would be in the position to say that, as far as the poll is concerned, the level of Kendo development is rather low. Different facts would call for different explanations, of course. I was only aswering the claim that asking these questions is irrelevant. I think it's quite interesting, |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|