LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 09-22-2009, 06:45 AM   #21
brraverishhh

Join Date
Jan 2006
Posts
5,127
Senior Member
Default
The only way I'll find out if it has been flagged is if/when it gets deleted like the two other times with Racist Haters and the original What Sex is That? videos. If it does go not all is lost since it is also up on Wntube (it would also be on Podblanc but Podblanc seems to be dead this time). BTW, you never get a reason when a video is deleted other than the video had 'inappropriate' content and there is no use arguing with them since you never get an answer.
brraverishhh is offline


Old 09-22-2009, 08:12 AM   #22
softy54534

Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
5,457
Senior Member
Default
Until we have our own media, that's the way it's going to be. Just keep on making the multimedia available, with an emphasis on having them distributed between ourselves and then to as many other people as possible.
softy54534 is offline


Old 09-22-2009, 09:16 AM   #23
Lt_Apple

Join Date
Dec 2008
Posts
4,489
Senior Member
Default
Best to put all Nationalist videos, audios and multimedia onto...

http://www.wntube.net/
Lt_Apple is offline


Old 09-22-2009, 09:58 AM   #24
Drugmachine

Join Date
Apr 2006
Posts
4,490
Senior Member
Default
Best to put all Nationalist videos, audios and multimedia onto...

http://www.wntube.net/
I already do, just do a search for The Voice and you will find that all eleven of the videos are there as well as a selection of the audio episodes.
Drugmachine is offline


Old 09-22-2009, 03:52 PM   #25
doctorzlo

Join Date
Jun 2006
Posts
4,488
Senior Member
Default
Well done!

You raised many good points, I'm looking forward to the next one.

Cheers

BlueEyedBlonde
doctorzlo is offline


Old 09-24-2009, 12:56 AM   #26
TorryJens

Join Date
Nov 2008
Posts
4,494
Senior Member
Default
I see its on SF. But what does this mean from bushranger? "I may not agree with ANN but it's a step in the right direction". Can someone point out what he means? Is he saying he doesnt agree with ANN members or just ANN.

If it is ANN are the things he dislikes about ANN that bad for WN? You know things like, unity, respect, freedom of speech, understanding of others beliefs, solidarity, Australian and New Zealand based White Nationalism, dedicated founders, staunch Anti Anti Fa.

I thought the vid by Jane and Trouble summed up the type of people and direction of ANN perfectly. It has always been that way. So I find it hard to understand what he is saying? Unlike the members here who have once belonged to SF. They can criticize because they have been members at one time or another. I do not understand people who make assumptions about this forum when they have never belonged.

Its true. You have Fighters, the hedgers, and the traitors. SF has more hedgers than anything else.
TorryJens is offline


Old 09-24-2009, 01:13 AM   #27
doctorzlo

Join Date
Jun 2006
Posts
4,488
Senior Member
Default
I see its on SF. But what does this mean from bushranger? "I may not agree with ANN but it's a step in the right direction". Can someone point out what he means? Is he saying he doesnt agree with ANN members or just ANN.

If it is ANN are the things he dislikes about ANN that bad for WN? You know things like, unity, respect, freedom of speech, understanding of others beliefs, solidarity, Australian and New Zealand based White Nationalism, dedicated founders, staunch Anti Anti Fa.

I thought the vid by Jane and Trouble summed up the type of people and direction of ANN perfectly. It has always been that way. So I find it hard to understand what he is saying? Unlike the members here who have once belonged to SF. They can criticize because they have been members at one time or another. I do not understand people who make assumptions about this forum when they have never belonged.

Its true. You have Fighters, the hedgers, and the traitors. SF has more hedgers than anything else.
I may not agree with ANN but it's a step in the right direction

Thats a quote from Roadtrain on SF.

I didnt realise that Roadtrain was Bushranger... Or am I missing somthing? which I suspect I am. Oh well. I Think whoever made that statement doesnt realise that ANN is a forum with varying points of view but a common ideology, and a common awareness of reality.
doctorzlo is offline


Old 09-24-2009, 01:43 AM   #28
TorryJens

Join Date
Nov 2008
Posts
4,494
Senior Member
Default
I may not agree with ANN but it's a step in the right direction

Thats a quote from Roadtrain on SF.

I didnt realise that Roadtrain was Bushranger... Or am I missing somthing? which I suspect I am. Oh well. I Think whoever made that statement doesnt realise that ANN is a forum with varying points of view but a common ideology, and a common awareness of reality.
Yep sorry about that Bushranger is a well respected member here. Ooops. ROADTRAIN is not Bushranger. Sorry mate.
TorryJens is offline


Old 09-24-2009, 02:04 AM   #29
Beerinkol

Join Date
Dec 2006
Posts
5,268
Senior Member
Default
Yep sorry about that Bushranger is a well respected member here. Ooops. ROADTRAIN is not Bushranger. Sorry mate.
A bushranger might hold up a roadtrain........ lol - there's some sort of nexus.
Beerinkol is offline


Old 09-24-2009, 02:06 AM   #30
MannoFr

Join Date
Mar 2007
Posts
4,451
Senior Member
Default
I see its on SF. But what does this mean from bushranger? "I may not agree with ANN but it's a step in the right direction". Can someone point out what he means? Is he saying he doesnt agree with ANN members or just ANN.

If it is ANN are the things he dislikes about ANN that bad for WN? You know things like, unity, respect, freedom of speech, understanding of others beliefs, solidarity, Australian and New Zealand based White Nationalism, dedicated founders, staunch Anti Anti Fa.

I thought the vid by Jane and Trouble summed up the type of people and direction of ANN perfectly. It has always been that way. So I find it hard to understand what he is saying? Unlike the members here who have once belonged to SF. They can criticize because they have been members at one time or another. I do not understand people who make assumptions about this forum when they have never belonged.

Its true. You have Fighters, the hedgers, and the traitors. SF has more hedgers than anything else.
I know...I wondered (probably with a very confused look on my face) what the hell this meant too.
It's a bit like the comments by jaxxen about AF being very, very, very anti-zionist.......weird...and I'm not sure where they're getting these ideas from or what the intention of the comments is.....
MannoFr is offline


Old 09-24-2009, 02:17 AM   #31
Slonopotam845

Join Date
Jan 2006
Posts
5,251
Senior Member
Default
I see its on SF. But what does this mean from bushranger? "I may not agree with ANN but it's a step in the right direction". Can someone point out what he means? Is he saying he doesnt agree with ANN members or just ANN.

If it is ANN are the things he dislikes about ANN that bad for WN? You know things like, unity, respect, freedom of speech, understanding of others beliefs, solidarity, Australian and New Zealand based White Nationalism, dedicated founders, staunch Anti Anti Fa.

I thought the vid by Jane and Trouble summed up the type of people and direction of ANN perfectly. It has always been that way. So I find it hard to understand what he is saying? Unlike the members here who have once belonged to SF. They can criticize because they have been members at one time or another. I do not understand people who make assumptions about this forum when they have never belonged.

Its true. You have Fighters, the hedgers, and the traitors. SF has more hedgers than anything else.
Speaking of Traitors that Hobbit rang me the other day he admitted to being Torana (who would've known? lol) he said he's sorry and all that but I don't trust him one bit, he's only crawling back because the "Klan" turned thier back on him.. Oh and Silverferns mum wears a star of David around her neck..
Slonopotam845 is offline


Old 09-24-2009, 02:30 AM   #32
Drugmachine

Join Date
Apr 2006
Posts
4,490
Senior Member
Default
I know...I wondered (probably with a very confused look on my face) what the hell this meant too.
It's a bit like the comments by jaxxen about AF being very, very, very anti-zionist.......weird...and I'm not sure where they're getting these ideas from or what the intention of the comments is.....
They are all listening to the enemy propaganda machine. Not very smart for a bunch of guys I would have thought as being above average White Nationalists. But it has always been a problem at SFDU the members tend to use the enemy PR machine if it helps them out.

Makes you wonder hey.
Drugmachine is offline


Old 09-26-2009, 05:28 AM   #33
Peptobismol

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
58
Posts
4,386
Senior Member
Default
I was exhilarated to hear a clarified view of WN Women's movement.
Peptobismol is offline


Old 09-26-2009, 09:10 AM   #34
softy54534

Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
5,457
Senior Member
Default
Speaking of Traitors that Hobbit rang me the other day he admitted to being Torana (who would've known? lol) he said he's sorry and all that but I don't trust him one bit, he's only crawling back because the "Klan" turned thier back on him.. Oh and Silverferns mum wears a star of David around her neck..
Ahhh ok...Hobbit is Torana eh?

Thats using multiple accounts too!

Far out I'm angry!!!!

The sneaky little rodent!

I thought that Torana guy sounded suss on MSN messenger.

I'll have to block him now.


There will be no remorse for a backstabbing weasel like Hep C Hobbit.

He is just using the same behaviour that all junkies do to try and make people feel sorry for him.

It's not gonna work!
softy54534 is offline


Old 09-26-2009, 09:27 AM   #35
PhillipHer

Join Date
Jun 2008
Age
58
Posts
4,481
Senior Member
Default
I still don't understand, now the cat is out of the bag re Silver Fern - is she still in the Klan?
PhillipHer is offline


Old 09-26-2009, 12:57 PM   #36
tgs

Join Date
Mar 2007
Age
48
Posts
5,125
Senior Member
Default
I know this hard but what all people need to do is get their mind passed the seemingly obvious and move to the cause.

I do not know how a discussion on White National Women becomes a bagging session.

What I saw on SF was Jane giving an ignormous amount of energy to a purpose.

In few years time you all look back at that other drama with insight. There was more going on then you could imagine. Silverfern was the tip of the iceberg-the obvious.

Truly, does it matter? Look at the energy of this video and see where one need put their energy - overused/overworked gossip ridden data or moving forward to change things.

I stopped posting here because I could not stand how things go to the Silverfern drama. I hardly knew her and by walking in innocently even my partner was throwing accusations at me because he wanted to play slops.

I am not a jealous person and suddenly I become bitter. Well how does that paradox match the one that I was niave? Scheming? Sheesk!

Freya does smear campaigns an woman that have power and threaten her. If that does not work in comes people playing psychiatrists, which is inappropriate. This is the net for heaven sakes. I took the data Silverfern gave and meticulously examined the case - unfortunately the observations of many of the accussed matched the data. The other outstanding issue that arose in my mind, is when a trouble maker is removed from a situation the general group settles. the group on SF did not settle and I pointed this out to a few people, that is not normal. Hence takes many ingredients to make a bad cake and I challenge each of you to stop and observe.

I live a quiet life. I am creative, spiritual and eccentric. I do not do S and M - that is just a muse game, however I do lock up wrong-doing and people who suppress. Took time to be strong about my spiritual outlook to others, that will pay off in about 5 - to - 10 years.

When I went to SF I was wishing two things - 1. to network and 2. to learn the law in Australia so I could protect myself. I still wonder how moronic people are when comes to gossiping.

Yes, I gave my partner some pictures I did for artistry - very tasteful I thought and if Freya was silly enough to pass them around then indeed I might have some interest

At the end of the day closed-mindedness results in things dying. If you do not have the creative/chaos energy things end and die.

The past is the past, put your energy into now and the future. So there you have it. I am not a jew and all the other crap that goes along with it. If you look at my posts on SF passed the gossip you will see the clever deductions of what I was observing.

You could ban me based on gossip and eventually be seen as stupid.

Good day.
tgs is offline


Old 09-26-2009, 09:49 PM   #37
Slonopotam845

Join Date
Jan 2006
Posts
5,251
Senior Member
Default
No point wasting time worrying about the "politics" over on Stormfront.

Almost all of us here have our own issues with Stormfront for some reason or another and that is why we came here to ANN.

Besides, most of the Americans on there have no relevance (or interest) to what is happening here in Australia whatsoever.

The FACT is Silverfern is a Jewish Spy and morons like Hep C Hobbit (aka "Torana") willingingly helped her cause infighting amongst Australian Nationalists (particularly in the state of Victoria).

If people lay down with dogs then they get fleas.


Anyways, back to WHITE women (not Jewesses) involved with White Nationalism...
Slonopotam845 is offline


Old 09-27-2009, 12:13 AM   #38
Big A

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
50
Posts
4,148
Administrator
Default
Yes - at the end of the day the jews and their useful idiots are fighting a losing battle, their purpose is to create division and infighting, I do not see anything like that here.
We all have good and bad days, people have their differences of opinion and debate their point sometimes rather robustly and im glad they do, for this place has enormous value through its free exchange of ideas.

I do not think there is much danger of people getting bogged down and diverted/distracted discussing a traitor, not here, and I do think people need to be aware of such issues and they should be discussed but I agree with you that it should not take away our energy from the real issues we face or the fact that Jane and Trouble did a top job on the video, particularly the fact that it targets a weak point in our movement, females, or more specifically the lack of them.

The media seeks to portray White Nationalism and the people involved with it as marginalized lonely white males, this is from my personal experience is almost totally bunk as I have meet many women and couples old and young in the movement but males do greatly outnumber females.
Perhaps this video of Trouble and Jane can start the process of increasing female numbers in the movement, the sane logical manner in which the information is presented would be very hard for any well balanced individual to dispute.

Again very good stuff!

PS - Ponytail, have you looked into the Creativity Movement?
Big A is offline


Old 09-27-2009, 12:46 AM   #39
radikal

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
54
Posts
4,523
Senior Member
Default
I know this hard but what all people need to do is get their mind passed the seemingly obvious and move to the cause.

I do not know how a discussion on White National Women becomes a bagging session.

What I saw on SF was Jane giving an ignormous amount of energy to a purpose.

In few years time you all look back at that other drama with insight. There was more going on then you could imagine. Silverfern was the tip of the iceberg-the obvious.

Truly, does it matter? Look at the energy of this video and see where one need put their energy - overused/overworked gossip ridden data or moving forward to change things.

I stopped posting here because I could not stand how things go to the Silverfern drama. I hardly knew her and by walking in innocently even my partner was throwing accusations at me because he wanted to play slops.

I am not a jealous person and suddenly I become bitter. Well how does that paradox match the one that I was niave? Scheming? Sheesk!

Freya does smear campaigns an woman that have power and threaten her. If that does not work in comes people playing psychiatrists, which is inappropriate. This is the net for heaven sakes. I took the data Silverfern gave and meticulously examined the case - unfortunately the observations of many of the accussed matched the data. The other outstanding issue that arose in my mind, is when a trouble maker is removed from a situation the general group settles. the group on SF did not settle and I pointed this out to a few people, that is not normal. Hence takes many ingredients to make a bad cake and I challenge each of you to stop and observe.

I live a quiet life. I am creative, spiritual and eccentric. I do not do S and M - that is just a muse game, however I do lock up wrong-doing and people who suppress. Took time to be strong about my spiritual outlook to others, that will pay off in about 5 - to - 10 years.

When I went to SF I was wishing two things - 1. to network and 2. to learn the law in Australia so I could protect myself. I still wonder how moronic people are when comes to gossiping.

Yes, I gave my partner some pictures I did for artistry - very tasteful I thought and if Freya was silly enough to pass them around then indeed I might have some interest

At the end of the day closed-mindedness results in things dying. If you do not have the creative/chaos energy things end and die.

The past is the past, put your energy into now and the future. So there you have it. I am not a jew and all the other crap that goes along with it. If you look at my posts on SF passed the gossip you will see the clever deductions of what I was observing.

You could ban me based on gossip and eventually be seen as stupid.

Good day.
radikal is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:38 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity