[tgs]

This episode looks at how Australia can be returned to a prosperous nation and details how just a few measures can replace the tag Made in China with the tag Made in Australia.

The Voice - Economic Solutions

Duration - 18 minutes 53 seconds
File Size - 4.32mb
Recording Date - January 2, 2008

[NeroASERCH]

I am surprised that nobody has replied to this episode. So, what is wrong with my economic model? Are you bastards so lazy that you wouldn't like doing one weekend a month two weeks a year in conscription until you are sixty in military, civil or social service? FFS, social service could be as a ref in your local footy game or feeding pensioners and sneaking them in a beer or two.

[Beerinkol]

I am surprised that nobody has replied to this episode. So, what is wrong with my economic model? Are you bastards so lazy that you wouldn't like doing one weekend a month two weeks a year in conscription until you are sixty in military, civil or social service? FFS, social service could be as a ref in your local footy game or feeding pensioners and sneaking them in a beer or two.

I like the general thrust of your ideas, but I have to disagree with the 'civil or social service' part.
Under the great and glorious New Order every physically and psychologically able male would be required to serve two years in the full-time military upon the completion of their education and then in the reserve until at least the age of 55, or until something happened that rendered them physically or mentally incapable of serving.
Sod the idea of 'civil or social service'. That is of no use to the nation at all and gives an easy out for the limp dicks and cowards out there.
We need a population like that of ancient Sparta, in which every able male was a warrior so that the entire nation is an armed camp.
Being the local scoutmaster will not contribute to that.
There will not be much of a problem with nancy boys who do not want to be part of the military, not after the indoctrination process of the Wodensvolk Youth (or whatever we call the latter-day Australian version of the HJ) and school cadets.
If anyone makes an issue out of not wanting to serve, there are plenty of other countries to which they can move and be a faggot pacifist.

[TorryJens]

I think most people as they get older may not want to be a full-on member of the military so their civil or social service may be in training new recruits. BTW, what is wrong with looking after our own in civil and social conscription projects? I just think that your ideas are unreasonable and will never be approved by the Joe Smith's out there where mine since they are more reasonable and still serve the nation's will. We are both on the same train and just this is your sticking point? Surely there is more?

[Ifroham4]

I think most people as they get older may not want to be a full-on member of the military so their civil or social service may be in training new recruits. BTW, what is wrong with looking after our own in civil and social conscription projects? I just think that your ideas are unreasonable and will never be approved by the Joe Smith's out there where mine since they are more reasonable and still serve the nation will. We are both on the same train and just this is your sticking point? Surely there is more?

I think that we are on the same train, but I am a hard bastard.
The sheeple will go along with universal military service because a propaganda campaign and social conditioning will lead the overwhelming majority of them to support it.
Five years in the HJ will have the young men keen to begin their service.
As for those who do not support it, nobody is keen to get a white feather.
There would be two tiers of citizenship. Those who serve/served would be full citizens with all the rights and entitlements.
The BDM (or whatever we call it) will programme girls to reject any male who is not an active member of the military in some capacity.
No military service, no get laid.
Those who did not serve would pay a higher level of taxation and be a second-class citizen in every way.
As for people not wanting to serve as they get older, I suspect from that thought that you have not spent time in uniform.
As a soldier grows older his role changes, because he is promoted and becomes more senior.
The day will come when he is incapable of swinging from tree to tree and letting rip with a Tarzan call, but he can still perform to requirement in less physical roles.
Also, there is nothing like serving in the army to keep a person exceptionally fit for their age.
I served in the reserve for about 10 years.
My father-in-law served until he was forcibly retired at the age of 55.
There is no way I could do at my current age what I did in the mechanised infantry when I was aged in my 20s, but with the natural progression of things I would have moved on to less physical roles as I grew older.
An old man can still be fit for his age and still perform as infantry, if he has to. He might just not be able to do a 10km run in full field kit to pursue a fleeing enemy. Consequently, older men would not be front-line infantry. They can, however, operate things such as transport and communications, even artillery.
You may not be aware that by the end of World War Two almost the entire network of German antiaircraft artillery was crewed by women, because the men were busy dying on the eastern and western fronts.
Look to the Home Guard and the Volksturm as examples for how older men can still be useful.
For something more up to date, look at Switzerland.

[HedgeYourBets]

I had a listen.
You missed the no 1 problem, but got close to it. Fractional reserve banking. Without banning it, you will ALWAYS end up ****ed.
AND, the Reserve Bank of Australia is NOT ours, it is foreign owned.
Our currency is private credit of a foreign company.
Without fractional reserve banking and the stock market, there is no inflation.
As for national service, I see military service as no 1, but I see that we could also have paramedics, fire service and similar for national service.
For, as good as an armed camp is, it is also good to have the other type of training in general circulation.

Damn, but you sound like me. Even I think it is me talking on the audio.

[Drugmachine]

the Reserve Bank of Australia is NOT ours, it is foreign owned.

Do you have a reference for that statement?

I'm curious as the Reserve Bank Act 1959 states:

Section 11 in effect gives the Treasurer control over RBA policy and section 30 states that all profits apart from those allocated to reserves are remitted to the Commonwealth.

Why would a foreign owned entity remit its profits to the Commonwealth and why would it cede control of policy to the government in the event of disagreement?

[Fegasderty]

I am surprised that nobody has replied to this episode. So, what is wrong with my economic model? Are you bastards so lazy that you wouldn't like doing one weekend a month two weeks a year in conscription until you are sixty in military, civil or social service? FFS, social service could be as a ref in your local footy game or feeding pensioners and sneaking them in a beer or two.

Some good ideas. However, I would like to see the following:

1. A return to the gold/silver standard with any paper issued by the Commonwealth fully convertible into PM.

2. Increases in the money supply would have to be created from increases in the reserves of PMs.

3. The prohibition of fractional reserve banking.

4. The prohibition of ownership of agricultural land by foreigners or CFCs (Controlled Foreign Corporations).

5. The immediate removal of Jews from positions in the judiciary as well as the banning of Jews from the bar, the prevention of Jews working as a solicitor, Jews would be prohibited from holding office in any form of government and their banning from all Police and National Security services.

6. The immediate deportation of illegal immigrants within a 72 hour period.

7. Australia would cease its involvement with the UN and engage in direct talks and treaties with other nations. The adoption of a non-interence policy would also be a positive step.

8. Personal (extertion) income tax would be scrapped. Income tax would be payable on investments but at a rate equivalent to the GST. Taxes distort the investment motivations of the populace. The only reason most engage in "negative gearing" is to save personal income tax which leads to people investing in assets that provide a poor return or are dependent on "capital growth" which is due to excessive monetary growth.

[Raj_Copi_Jin]

Do you have a reference for that statement?

I'm curious as the Reserve Bank Act 1959 states:

Section 11 in effect gives the Treasurer control over RBA policy and section 30 states that all profits apart from those allocated to reserves are remitted to the Commonwealth.

Why would a foreign owned entity remit its profits to the Commonwealth and why would it cede control of policy to the government in the event of disagreement?

No, I don't have a link for you. My search skills are not very good. However, what I am saying isn't hidden knowledge. The federal reserve, bank of england and others are not owned by the governments either.
You should be able to guess who owns them.

[Lt_Apple]

No, I don't have a link for you. My search skills are not very good. However, what I am saying isn't hidden knowledge. The federal reserve, bank of england and others are not owned by the governments either.
You should be able to guess who owns them.

In that case I have to disagree with the ascertain that the RBA is foreign owned. The ASIC refers to the RBA as a NRET (Non Registered Entity).

An organisation that is not required to be registered with ASIC but whose name appears on our database because, under the terms of its incorporation, the organisation is required to lodge certain documents with ASIC, (usually annual returns or annual financial statements).

I thought the Bank of England was nationalised by the Bank of England Act 1946. However, upon reading the Act I am wondering if the Act was a ruse. As if I read it correctly no "real" or effective change of ownership occurred.

Here is the Act in question Bank of England Act 1946 I'll leave it to everyone to make their own assessment.

Yes, I am aware the US Federal Reserve is a private organisation and possibly the greatest swindle in the history of mankind!

[NeroASERCH]

In that case I have to disagree with the ascertain that the RBA is foreign owned. The ASIC refers to the RBA as a NRET (Non Registered Entity).

An organisation that is not required to be registered with ASIC but whose name appears on our database because, under the terms of its incorporation, the organisation is required to lodge certain documents with ASIC, (usually annual returns or annual financial statements).

I thought the Bank of England was nationalised by the Bank of England Act 1946. However, upon reading the Act I am wondering if the Act was a ruse. As if I read it correctly no "real" or effective change of ownership occurred.

Here is the Act in question Bank of England Act 1946 I'll leave it to everyone to make their own assessment.

Yes, I am aware the US Federal Reserve is a private organisation and possibly the greatest swindle in the history of mankind!

The same families that own the fed own the bank of england, the reserve bank of australia and all the other imf/world bank affiliated central banks.

Clue: Iraq had no such central bank under Saddam.
It does now.
See a pattern?

[Lt_Apple]

The same families that own the fed own the bank of england, the reserve bank of australia and all the other imf/world bank affiliated central banks.

Clue: Iraq had no such central bank under Saddam.
It does now.
See a pattern?

I'm not disputing that there is a pattern or even that the usual suspects are involved but as far as I can ascertain the RBA is not foreigned owned and no evidence to the contrary has been provided.

[TorryJens]

WOW

This stuff is gold, so much wisdom in this place I almost cant believe it!

I was always under the impression that the Australian Federal reserve was a private Rothschild bank but ive dug and dug and can find very little so I am not certain however I suspect it is weather its national or not - ie the case with the bank of England which is controlled by "the city of London" ie Rothschild and Euro blue bloods, by some legislative swindle despite being national.

I argued this point with David Oldfield on 2GB one night and he said it was a government asset however a "Holding House" had huge sway over it (a private company that holds all stocks and shares of a nation in its possession - and legally owns, for our own protection of course)

I don't know for sure, I also read from a good source the only central banks on the planet that wasn't a privately owned proxy of the City of London/Rothschild cancer existed in Iran, Iraq and North Korea and as a prior poster noted Iraq's central bank is now a Rothschild possession, and indeed there is a pattern which is why we will have to be careful when the big day comes.

In any case you just have to look at what has happened to us since the demise of the old Commonwealth bank which used to issue credit and the institution of the Federal Reserve and there is your answer, de-industrialization, no tax for multinationals, unrestricted migration from the **** pits of the planet, and tyrannical gun laws to name just a fraction, where there is smoke there is fire.

I point you towards a couple of articles from Makow which are brief descriptions of the hegemony we face that are good reading.
Dont forget he is a Jew but seems to be a good one as I can find minimal disinformation.

http://www.savethemales.ca/000447.html

http://www.savethemales.ca/000808.html

This video is one of the best describing the history up to almost the current day of what has been happening with Federal Reserve systems, fractional reserve lending, creation of wars etc etc, this should be compulsory watching for every citizen, the only thing is its an American viewpoint I wish there was an Australian equivalent.

[radikal]

Hey

Im trying to listen to this radio show and it cuts out after the first 20 or 30 seconds?

Be good to hear it I love the economic stuff.

[NeroASERCH]

Hey

Im trying to listen to this radio show and it cuts out after the first 20 or 30 seconds?

Be good to hear it I love the economic stuff.

I just tried it and it works. Perhaps, you should right click on the link and save it to your PC and play it on your media player (a good one is VLC).