[NeroASERCH]

I must apologise for the amount of time that it has taken since the last broadcast. It was not my intention to make this such a long broadcast but the more I researched the larger it grew. I hope that the final product is a good representation of the amount of effort that I put in.



This time we take a look at the poisons the government and food manufacturers place in our food and water and look at what effects these poisons have on our health.

The Voice - Poison

Duration - 51 minutes 29 seconds
File Size - 11.7mb
Recording Date - May 19, 2008.

[Drugmachine]

Excellent stuff Trouble!

[Peptobismol]

Great show.
Would like to add one point, which is that under Section 51 paragraph 23A fluoridation of the water supply is illegal. That clause states that the government cannot impose medication upon the population. Fluoridation is forced mass medication and, therefore, declared to be illegal by the constitution.

[Drugmachine]

Great show.
Would like to add one point, which is that under Section 51 paragraph 23A fluoridation of the water supply is illegal. That clause states that the government cannot impose medication upon the population. Fluoridation is forced mass medication and, therefore, declared to be illegal by the constitution.

I think they would argue that:

1) It is in the public interest, and

2) They aren't forcing you to drink the water from the council water supply.

[Lillie_Steins]

I think they would argue that:

1) It is in the public interest, and

The thing is, it is not in the publics interest to be poisoned by the very thing that keeps us alive. Sodium Fluoride is of course a by-product of the aluminium industry, is a known toxin, makes us docile, causes cancer and Alzheimer's disease among other things. Yet, we are expected to bathe and drink the **** just because of the lie that it will be good for our teeth? What a load of crap.

2) They aren't forcing you to drink the water from the council water supply.

If they aren't forcing us to drink it, why then is it in our water? What are we supposed to drink and bathe in then?

[MannoFr]

I think they would argue that:

1) It is in the public interest, and

2) They aren't forcing you to drink the water from the council water supply.

It does not matter what they may say, the Australian Constitution states that they cannot do it, therefore it is illegal.
The case would be a slam dunk and should be over in five minutes. Simply open a copy of the constitution to the relevant page and point to the clause.
There is no room for argument.
I wish that I had the money to pursue such an action.
After that I would go after the provision in the Tax Act which states that we are all guilty until we prove that we are innocent. This is contrary to the foundation of British (and therefore Australian) law.
Then there are the racial vilification laws, which are a violation of international treaties that Australia has signed on human rights and political freedom.

[brraverishhh]

If they aren't forcing us to drink it, why then is it in our water?

That wasn't my point but rather the council water supply is an option, you don't have to accept if you feel it is against your cultural or religious background. I'm just telling you what they would tell you in court.

What are we supposed to drink and bathe in then?

Rain water? River water? Are there not other options open to you at all? My parents holiday home uses 100% rain water for everything it needs and it used 9 months of the year by friends and family without any problems. We have a large water tank out the back on legs which stores the water for when it is needed.