[softy54534]

WOMEN TO BE MADE UNEMPLOYABLE BY MATERNITY LEAVE
AUSTRALIA CALLING
(5/30/08) The Fabian Marxist government of Prime Minister Kevin Rudd wants to force private industry to give up to a year of paid maternity leave to women. Are they so stupid that they cannot see that nobody will hire women, or is the real agenda to force women out of the workforce so that an even larger scale of non-white immigration can be 'justified'?
www.nsm88radio.com

[Raj_Copi_Jin]

sounds like you are on the mend.

interesting point about the banks making a woman get sterilised before they would give them a loan. Do you have more information about this?

What was the music you played - No crime in being white?

[LottiFurmann]

What was the music you played - No crime in being white?

That song was performed by Day Of The Sword.

Derrick, it is nice to hear that you are on the mend.

[softy54534]

Perhaps they want to raise the white birthrate? I can only hope. Dr. Pierce talked about doing something much like this to try and boost our numbers and raise the general IQ of the population. Even if this isn't their plan it may well become the consequence of their policy.

[Paul Bunyan]

The quickest and easiest way to raise the birthrate of the most intelligent
whites in our society, would be to waive the hecs fees for any white graduates who marry and have a child. Thus eliminating a crippling debt
burden on the couple, and encouraging them to have even more children.

[HedgeYourBets]

The quickest and easiest way to raise the birthrate of the most intelligent
whites in our society, would be to waive the hecs fees for any white graduates who marry and have a child. Thus eliminating a crippling debt
burden on the couple, and encouraging them to have even more children.

Just give them a huge bonus for having a third and subsequent children.

[9mm_fan]

The policy that works best to encourage white people to have children was implemented by the Third Reich.
Under a National Socialist regime the banks are nationalised and the Jewish usury system is abolished, so all sorts of things become possible.
Home loans were given to couples who wanted to buy a home. There was a nominal interest rate, just enough to cover the bank's operating costs.
For each child that the couple had, 25% was wiped off the balance of the loan.
So, have four kids and the house is almost a freebie.
The Reich proved that the government could actually make a profit out of this deal, because of the sales tax and other taxes collected on the consumption of the growing family.
The family does not have to commit a huge chunk of its income to paying usury to the banks, so all sorts of other lifestyle options are opened.
Give away a home for free and make a profit on the deal.
Sounds impossible on the face of it, but the numbers showed that it worked.

[Lillie_Steins]

In 1940 the Reich Bank cut personal housing loans from 4.5% to 4.0%

[Raj_Copi_Jin]

Hey Derrick, I found this one for you.

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...0-2702,00.html

[Slonopotam845]

I thought exactly the same thing - it will just make businesses not want to hire women of child-bearing age.

Anyway a year fully off is not what all new parents need or want - they need flexible working arrangements for at least a decade. New mothers actually don't want to be stuck at home alone with the baby for a year generally. They want to continue to have some personal interests which give them a sense of self and ensure they can be productive members of the community as well as mothering. Obviously mothering takes precedence but there is a serious depression and hopelessness that arises from having absolutely jack intellectual stimulation or decent social contact, especially when you're sleep deprived.
Just a little bit of a sense of being involved in a community is all that's needed and those damn stupid 'mother's groups' are just pathetic - any intelligent woman finds them akin to being on the set of one of those shows like Jerry Springer - seriously!!!!
Once upon a time we raised our children as a community with each parent and extended family members taking different degrees of a role at different life stages for the child. Obviously when you're breast-feeding you need to be constantly with your baby, but this should not preclude you from having a life as well - in fact its great stimulation for the baby as well.
One of my best friends had her first child while we were towards the end of uni (her husband was at a different uni) so she was allowed to bring the baby into the back of lecture theatres to breast-feed if necesary and there was the option to leave the baby at the care centre for naps etc while she attended lectures. This was a great arrangement - she was minutes away if needed and yet able to continue to educate herself.
On the other hand my mother had to leave uni after gaining honours in law in her first year of study, because she became pregnant with my older brother. The world indeed improved on this front over that generation but they really need to think more flexibly on these things! Parenting duties don't suddenly go away after 12 months!!!!!!!!
Flexible work hours and arrangements such as allowing remote log-ins etc would solve a tonne of other problems as well - traffic congestion to name one!

[Ifroham4]

My prediction is that after the maternity leave welfare handout has been in for a year the government will decide that it cannot afford the cost, so there will be some sort of BS justification offered to transfer the cost to business.
This will instantly make women of reproductive age unemployable.
It will set the cause of women back 120 years.
I have raised the matter with a few business people whom I know and they have all said the same thing: they have already stopped hiring young women because they can also see what I have predicted coming down the road.
The only females whom they will hire will be on the high side of 45 years old.
The young women who work for them now will not be fired, but if/when they leave they will be replaced by someone who is past her child-bearing years.
As I said on the show, either Labor is too stupid to understand the obvious cause and effect of the paid maternity leave madness, or it is part of a plan to create a real skills shortage so that the importation of more gooks, niggers, Indians and Arabs can be justified.
Another factor to consider is that because women of reproductive age will be rendered unemployable, it will be impossible for all except a tiny minority to buy a house in Australia.
Two full-time incomes are needed to buy a home in Australia, largely because of the way that extortionate taxation and fees by local and state governments have inflated the cost of land and construction. I once heard a developer being interviewed on radio, who said that in New South Wales taxes and fees added about $150,000 to the cost of a typical suburban house block.
Take away the income of the female part of the typical family unit and the home loan would require almost all of the remaining income.
In short: impossible.
Welcome to the transformation of Australia into a nation of tenants. The landlords will most likely be the big mutual companies, which have been angling for some time through their bought-and-paid-for politicians to force private investors out of the rental property market.
Because home building is the single most important sector of the Australian economy (believe it or not, that is correct) this will lead to an economic catastrophy that will dwarf what is in the process of happening now.
As I said, either Labor is genuinely too stupid to understand this, or it is all part of a well-crafted plan to destroy and country and flood it with niggers.

[Beerinkol]

Very good point about the consequences for the reality of home ownership. Another factor that goes into this is the lack of availability of land upon which one can build a basic home and slowly add rooms.
Now one is forced to buy either an apartment, an excessive mansion in a development (with effectively no yard) or the land upon which one is only allowed to build (and must build fairly quickly) a specific, enormous house.
The older generation criticise us for 'wanting' this but in reality we're not allowed to build small crappy houses anymore!!!!!!!!!!

[Paul Bunyan]

derrick was right! why keep pregnant women when you can hire coolie labour?

source

WOMEN are being sacked for taking maternity leave, and told to quit if they can't juggle family and the work roster, the Fair Work Ombudsman's office has found.

The Ombudsman was given the power to investigate discrimination for the first time in July and is already receiving 30 complaints a week, and investigating 40 serious cases.

The Ombudsman's chief counsel, Natalie James, said she was concerned at the number of women losing their jobs for taking maternity leave.

''Some employers are attempting to avoid their obligations to women when they return to work after the birth of a child,'' she told a conference.

Ms James said one woman who requested maternity leave was initially flatly refused by her boss, who said he planned to sell the business. When she raised her legal rights, he agreed to her request, but eight months into her maternity leave she saw her job advertised in the paper. When she contacted her boss she was told her position was no longer available to her.

It was only when an inspector from the Ombudsman's office intervened that the woman was able to return to her job.

In another case, Ms James said a woman with young children faced a ''drastic change'' in her roster, to four 10-hour days from five eight-hour days, meaning she couldn't drop her children at day care. Her boss said she would have to resign if she was unable to work the new hours, until the Ombudsman's office intervened.

''Unfortunately, we've known for a long time that there is hidden discrimination occurring,'' said University of Sydney associate professor Marian Baird, an expert in maternity-leave research.

Professor Baird said it is not only small businesses that are a problem - large companies often ''reorganise'' while a woman is away, leaving no position to return to.

''It is a really insidious and difficult area that we have to address,'' she said.

New mothers are ''in a vulnerable position and often the last thing they want is to fight a battle with their employer''.

Professor Baird said employers need their female staff and companies ''risk very bad branding'' if word got out that they made life difficult for women taking, or refused, maternity leave.

[Beerinkol]

If we had a cohesive community with racial loyalty above all other loyalties then employers would want to keep our women involved in this community and we would all be flexible around each others' strengths and needs. Any woman who felt her pregnancy/child care really did affect her ability to perform her job would happily relinquish it and know full well that there'd be other options for her, options valued by her people. Women today are regularly given the message that caring for their own child at the expense of working makes them a 'lesser mortal'. We're all also subjected to such insane financial commitments that two incomes are barely enough!

Some pregnancies are worse than others and some jobs are not for a pregnant woman to perform - if everyone trusted each other and worked together in a completely fair and balanced system all would be well. Some jobs do not really need you to be on-site either - they can be done from home in intermittent bursts around caring for a newborn - this keeps the woman feeling happy as she's still getting some intellectual stimulation and is involved in her community.

Also, if women knew they could return to some intellectually stimulating work as it became more and more possible for them around child care as their child increasingly needed social interraction and less one-on-one with their mother, then they'd be less frantic about desperately hanging on to a specific role during the period of time in which child care is incredibly intense for mothers.
If it wasn't the case that if you take time out you lose your professional registrations/certification etc then this would be more possible as well!
I could go on all day with suggestions to solve this issue.........

[NeroASERCH]

WOMEN are being sacked for taking maternity leave, and told to quit if they can't juggle family and the work roster, the Fair Work Ombudsman's office has found.

The Ombudsman was given the power to investigate discrimination for the first time in July and is already receiving 30 complaints a week, and investigating 40 serious cases. This was so obvious to me (and I believe most patriots) when Labor began the whole maternity leave insanity, yet the typical Labor voter was too freaking retarded to see the bleeding obvious.
So were the feminists, who were/are so fixated on notions of theoretical gender equality that they have no grasp of reality.

[LottiFurmann]

This was so obvious to me (and I believe most patriots) when Labor began the whole maternity leave insanity, yet the typical Labor voter was too freaking retarded to see the bleeding obvious.
So were the feminists, who were/are so fixated on notions of theoretical gender equality that they have no grasp of reality.

yeah but doesn't it feel good to be vindicated? personally i find no greater satisfaction than saying ' i told you so'.

[Big A]

I could go on all day with suggestions to solve this issue.........

Well perhaps you can talk about it.