[TorryJens]

VETERAN NATIONAL SOCIALIST DAEVID PALMER SPEAKS OUT
AUSTRALIA CALLING
In-depth interview with Australia's longest serving and most controversial National Socialist, Daevid Palmer.
www.nsm88radio.com

[Lillie_Steins]

Thanks for that mate big time - Dave is a ****head and will never see us go anywhere - he is gone from this forum as of now. I was willing to work with him until this speech and many here will say that I was slow to hit him. He makes a lot of sense but he is poison to us, his **** stops here right now. The ANN has never condoned anything he has ever said, he is on his own from now on. Old Dave is now banned.

[softy54534]

Thanks for that mate big time - Dave is a ****head and will never see us go anywhere - he is gone from this forum as of now. I was willing to work with him until this speech and many here will say that I was slow to hit him. He makes a lot of sense but he is poison to us, his **** stops here right now. The ANN has never condoned anything he has ever said, he is on his own from now on. Old Dave is now banned.

Goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooonnnnnnnnnne

[Peptobismol]

Holy ****, it seems that David and I are in agreement that infiltration of the major partys is the way to go.

Now does that make David sane, or me senile

[doctorzlo]

Holy ****, it seems that David and I are in agreement that infiltration of the major partys is the way to go.

Now does that make David sane, or me senile

Thats a little hard mate, you will be shot down by your 'collegues' as soon as you open your mouth. Remember Pauline Hanson in 1996?
We cant fully infiltrate the major parties, the Jews wont allow it.

[S.T.D.]

Daevid Palmer may have some good points but they are few and far between.

He is a "white ant" and a provocateur in my opinion. He also gives more sensible Nationalists a bad name.

The media love him for the fact that he is a joke. Nobody can be taken seriously who is only 5ft tall and dresses in a "green gnome" (Klan) outfit and appears in ZOO magazine.

It is also very coincidental that he always seems to get in the media every time Nationalism is on the rise in Australia (eg; during One Nation in the late 90's and during Cronulla in 2005).

Perhaps Daevid is a nice person once you get to know him? Honestly I don't know. But for the sake of Nationalism actually making any progress here in Australia....he needs to retire.

[Raj_Copi_Jin]

Thanks for that mate big time - Dave is a ****head and will never see us go anywhere - he is gone from this forum as of now. I was willing to work with him until this speech and many here will say that I was slow to hit him. He makes a lot of sense but he is poison to us, his **** stops here right now. The ANN has never condoned anything he has ever said, he is on his own from now on. Old Dave is now banned.

So that I can understand your thinking, please explain what it was that Daevid said that you found so objectionable.
Your reaction seems to me to be extreme, in comparison to my understanding of what he said.
Have I missed something?

[brraverishhh]

So that I can understand your thinking, please explain what it was that Daevid said that you found so objectionable.
Your reaction seems to me to be extreme, in comparison to my understanding of what he said.
Have I missed something?

I have to agree. I listened to the interview last night, and found Davids brief history quite interesting.
Obviously I dont have a personal history with David, so there is no animosity, or endorsement of the man.

As stated above, I too feel as though I have missed something.

There seems to be a lot of people who find David disagreeable, and want to see him gone from the forum. I don't undertand this either, after all, if it's okay to have a video of a man's head being hacked off (Russian beheading) surely then, absolutely anything goes, and any individual can enter this site and participate, on any level they want.

What is the benchmark for appropriate behaviour, or content, on ANN?

Cheers.

[Lt_Apple]

I have to agree. I listened to the interview last night, and found Davids brief history quite interesting.
Obviously I dont have a personal history with David, so there is no animosity, or endorsement of the man.

As stated above, I too feel as though I have missed something.

There seems to be a lot of people who find David disagreeable, and want to see him gone from the forum. I don't understand this either, after all, if it's okay to have a video of a man's head being hacked off (Russian beheading) surely then, absolutely anything goes, and any individual can enter this site and participate, on any level they want.

What is the benchmark for appropriate behaviour, or content, on ANN?

Cheers.

Daevid has a bad habit of making threats to people outside of the forum. This usually comes about if he feels he is not getting the attention he craves. Much like a spoilt child who screams for his mother to pick him up.

Threats of exposure and other BS is the norm from Daevid. Sound familiar? Sure he may have been around a long time but if you talk to anyone who truly knows him you will understand that this forum is better off without his Grand Standing. As I have stated in another section of this forum its not a matter of us not willing to work with him it’s a matter of him not willing work with us.


I for one thank the mods for this decision.

[PhillipHer]

I'm listening to him now and tend to agree with where he wants to go but disagree about how to get there.

When things become politically correct, instead of going against the current as Daevid Palmer would like (and does), we should be be looking at playing the game but bending it to our own will.

Points I would make based on listening to this recording:

1) While I admit that politics is a little too Jew-heavy, attacking the Jews will get us nowhere, as it has in the last 30 years. At the moment they control the field, we just need to learn the game that they have created and beat them at it. For a start we need to get more like-minded people through University in the key areas that some people would say are 'Jew dominated', law and accountancy being the top two.

2) Women should be encouraged to have more children, but deducting tax for children will not encourage children, merely make it easier once the children are born.

3) 'Apartheid' is a dirty word in the public mind, we should avoid using it at all costs. We should avoid using loaded words.

4) Daevid needs to take a back seat out of the eyes of the public. While his he is good at pointing out problems, his public image isn't good enough for a spot-light leadership role. A leader needs to be generally well liked and have a charismatic appeal to the mainstream rather than a political minority. The whole idea of "slapping on a swastika arm band" (as mentioned) is a silly idea which will only alienate us from the mainstream that we desperately need if we are to win in the democratic game.

5) The comments by Derrick MacThomas at the end of the audio file were good. The amount of facts was just right, not too many and not too few.

[LottiFurmann]

2) Women should be encouraged to have more children, but deducting tax for children will not encourage children, merely make it easier once the children are born.

Perhaps someone can help me out if I have missed something big here. (Which may have occurred because listening to that fool was mind numbing.)

OK, so for each Child born you get a 20% tax holiday. I understand that much.

Question – Is that per financial year? If not, when does the tax holiday expire? I.e. How many years do you continue this tax holiday?

If Yes (per financial year), that would mean you have to give birth to 5 kids in one year to get 100% tax holiday. That’s a big effort, lol.

[Peptobismol]

I think he means that you would pay 20% less tax than you would normally for every child you have.

[Lt_Apple]

When he was asked for a brief history, i was expecting it to be, you know, brief.... Couldn't stand listening to it anymore so off it went.

[Peptobismol]

I think he means that you would pay 20% less tax than you would normally for every child you have.

Forever?

[Big A]

When he was asked for a brief history, i was expecting it to be, you know, brief.... Couldn't stand listening to it anymore so off it went.

Yeah tell me about it lol.... perhaps Derrick should have said "Brief / short / concise / succinct / to the point / pithy / epigrammatic". Maybe Palmer would understand / appreciate / recognize / comprehend / realise this better.

[S.T.D.]

Forever?

I don't know as it isn't my idea. Even if it was only till the youngest child turned 16 it would be an interesting idea. It needs work though as changing a persons tax grade isn't easy when proof is involved (i.e. proving to the government that you actually have children).

[brraverishhh]

I don't know as it isn't my idea. Even if it was only till the youngest child turned 16 it would be an interesting idea. It needs work though as changing a persons tax grade isn't easy when proof is involved (i.e. proving to the government that you actually have children).

Yes i know it was not your idea, i was just trying to flesh it out in my own mind. Shows how complex a simple idea can be.

[HedgeYourBets]

Yeah tell me about it lol.... perhaps Derrick should have said "Brief / short / concise / succinct / to the point / pithy / epigrammatic". Maybe Palmer would understand / appreciate / recognize / comprehend / realise this better.

HEY!! Are you extracting the michael/taking the piss/being sarcastic/having a go?

How rude/amusing/humourous/tittilating.

[Ifroham4]

hahahahaha, you guys crack me up something brutal/savage/severe/unmerciful

Good times