[S.T.D.]

ZOG TO BYPASS SEARCH WARRANTS
AUSTRALIA CALLING
Under a new anti-terrorism law proposed by the Federal Government the ZOG (Zionist Occupation Government) troopers will be able to search your house without serving you with a warrant, while you are not there and they do not have to even tell you that you have been searched. Still think that you are living in a free country?
www.nsm88radio.com

[Big A]

ZOG TO BYPASS SEARCH WARRANTS
AUSTRALIA CALLING
Under a new anti-terrorism law proposed by the Federal Government the ZOG (Zionist Occupation Government) troopers will be able to search your house without serving you with a warrant, while you are not there and they do not have to even tell you that you have been searched. Still think that you are living in a free country?
www.nsm88radio.com

This is nothing new.

[LottiFurmann]

If it helps to stop terrorism I don't see it as that big a issue.

It will begin with Islamists being searched and then it will move on to Outlaw Bike Clubs and in a few years or maybe sooner the Feds will be searching Nationalists and anybody else that is anti-Treason is any way, shape or form.

Anybody that will surrender a bit of liberty for a bit of security deserve neither.

Regards
NoCrusties.

[MannoFr]

Gee, id better clean my room then.

[MannoFr]

If it helps to stop terrorism I don't see it as that big a issue.

You must one of those who says, if you do nothing wrong you've got nothing to worry about. Braindead idiots like you piss me off no end.

[Peptobismol]

If it helps to stop terrorism I don't see it as that big a issue.

All anti terrorism laws should be repealed, they are not necessary. There has Not been one terrorist act committed on Australian soil since "Honest" John issued us all with those fridge magnets.

[softy54534]

You must one of those who says, if you do nothing wrong you've got nothing to worry about. Braindead idiots like you piss me off no end.

In my internet travels, if I come across a post that that is really informative or explains something well, I keep a copy of the text for my own reference and education. These words aren't mine, but I think they are appropriate to this thread (apologies to the author whose name I did not keep and yes, it came from Scumfront)...

The most common retort against privacy advocates -- by those in favor of ID checks, cameras, databases, data mining and other wholesale surveillance measures -- is this line: "If you aren't doing anything wrong, what do you have to hide?"

Some clever answers:

"If I'm not doing anything wrong, then you have no cause to watch me." "

Because the government gets to define what's wrong, and they keep changing the definition."

"Because you might do something wrong with my information."

My problem with quips like these -- as right as they are -- is that they accept the premise that privacy is about hiding a wrong. It's not. Privacy is an inherent human right, and a requirement for maintaining the human condition with dignity and respect. If you don’t realise that giving up these rights will mean that the government can and will use them against you one day means that you are at best, very naive, and at worst - ****ing stupid.

You might think that is fair enough that these measures are used against “terrorists”. Unfortunately anyone who is proud of their race and against the multicultural policies of today’s government will also fall under this banner, and you will wake up one day and find yourself to be the next target….

Cheers

BlueEyedBlonde

[Big A]

Who are you to assume things about me, go away and sort out that attitude problem of yours and try treating fellow nationalists with respect.

Who the hell are you to tell me that I've got an attitude problem?

[S.T.D.]

Does the 1986 terrorist bombing of the Turkish Consulate-General in Melbourne ring a bell? And in 1988 the bombings of cars and premises belonging to diplomatic representatives in the Australian Capital Territory..

They were pre-fridge magnet.

[Raj_Copi_Jin]

You could say I'm not as 'extreme' as a lot of Nationalists, my opinions will differ occasionally from the mainstream, but I don't see a problem with that as I still want the main goals of W/N to be accomplished.

Also I don't remember just because you may a be site owner/moderator it gives you the right to be a tool towards people who you disagree with.

Believing in a moral society is not extreme... Condoning faggotry is extreme!

Regards
NoCrusties.

[MannoFr]

You could say I'm not as 'extreme' as a lot of Nationalists, my opinions will differ occasionally from the mainstream, but I don't see a problem with that as I still want the main goals of W/N to be accomplished.

Also I don't remember just because you may a be site owner/moderator it gives you the right to be a tool towards people who you disagree with.

The problem is you are 'mainstream'. Whatever, 'mainstream' means. 'Mainstream' is the new catch-cry of Scumfront nowadays. They wish to be more 'inclusive and mainstream.' What a load of crap.

What are the main goals of WN?

What is your definition of 'extreme'? You sound like many of the fools that are blindly going through life oblivious to the destruction of their habitat.

Yes, Trouble can be a tool to whoever he wants. If you don't like it, leave.

Sensitive, new-age pricks who fold at the first sign of confrontation have no place in my new world.

If you are in favour of Howard's terrorism laws then you are no better than the legion of blind fools out there who can't see beyond their mortgage payments and the weekend's bar-b-que.

Take your pedestrian intellect elsewhere.

You will get run-over here.

[S.T.D.]

You could say I'm not as 'extreme' as a lot of Nationalists, my opinions will differ occasionally from the mainstream, but I don't see a problem with that as I still want the main goals of W/N to be accomplished.

Also I don't remember just because you may a be site owner/moderator it gives you the right to be a tool towards people who you disagree with.

That is what is called being a trimmer.
That is what Nick Griffin has been for years and what Le Pen has become under the influence of his daughter.
Trimmers are cowards who look for an easy way out because they lack the courage and intellectual honesty to confront the difficult issues.
Poofters have no place in the New Order. Homosexuality is contrary to the order of nature and is destructive to society. It also breeds all sorts of other problems due to the lifestyle choices that these dysfunctional people make.
Worst of all, the only thing that stands between most homosexuals and paedophilia is opportunity.
I know this from personal experience.
Come the great and glorious New Order I would not advocate rounding homosexuals up and turning them into bars of soap, but they would have to retreat into the closet and close the door firmly behind themselves.
There would be no Oxford Street mardi gras, no 'gay rights' advocates (they would be removed from society) and no public displays of homosexual behaviour.
Such activity would result in those involved becoming one of the 'disappeared'.
It is necessary, unfortunately, for the scalpel to be used to cut away cancerous tissue to preserve the life of the rest of the body.
If poofters want to sodomise each other behind closed doors in their own homes that is their business. I do not approve, but homosexuality has been with us since the dawn of our species, so it is unrealistic to expect that a law will stop it. We might as well pass a law against the tide coming in.
All that we can do is insist that homosexuals be discreet and not molest children.
Homosexuals cannot breed and they like young meat, so they are always looking to 'convert' vulnerable and sexually confused teenagers. That is what the public displays and 'gay rights' BS is about.
Homosexuality is contrary to the best interests of the race, so that is why white racialists (of all forms) are opposed to homosexuality.
If someone claims to be a white racialist, but is happy to have homosexuals strolling down the street arm in arm, they are either terribly confused and uneducated or a Zionist agent.

[Ifroham4]

Come the great and glorious New Order I would not advocate rounding homosexuals up and turning them into bars of soap.

I would, but then again why not let AIDS reduce the number of sausage jockeys? Have to love mother nature.

[Raj_Copi_Jin]

I've had enough of scum from Stromfront coming here and hoping to get the best of both worlds.

STORMFRONT IS A HAVEN FOR JEW-LOVERS,CRETINS AND LOW-LIFE BUGS.

Can you understand that? It's no use saying " I have good friends there and they mean well". That's bulls h i t.

The place is run by Don Black who is quite happy to have scum like jack_boot and jew tree in charge. There is no honour amongst these intellectual midgets. Personal information has been given to the enemy in order to discredit and harm good people. Lilith and BVH were allowed to run free and unfettered until they self-destructed.

If anyone continues to post on and participate in that board after all that has happened then they get no mercy from me.

WN's will properly rise from the ashes. It's a natural thing. Stay with Scumfront and you associate with the likes of jack_boot and jewtree. Disagree with them and you are banned. Anyone still there is afflicted with 'guilt by association'.

Make up your minds. Stay there and support the enemy or leave and do something for your Race. Your choice.

[MannoFr]

If the government has the right to search you or your property at any time they feel like it you are no longer a free man.

The writers of The Sovereign Individual (highly recommended reading) refer to governments as legalised mafia or racketeers. I agree wholeheartedly.

[MannoFr]

Who are you to assume things about me, go away and sort out that attitude problem of yours and try treating fellow nationalists with respect.

Hmm, try the site moderator (one of them) and someone known by many people... Fellow Nationalists? I see only you getting in the way. And I don't see you as a Nationalist, not by your largely incomprehensible ramblings.

You could say I'm not as 'extreme' as a lot of Nationalists, my opinions will differ occasionally from the mainstream, but I don't see a problem with that as I still want the main goals of W/N to be accomplished.

What mainstream? I don't see anything mainstream about Nationalism, considering it is frowned upon by the general public.
What goals might they be?

Also I don't remember just because you may a be site owner/moderator it gives you the right to be a tool towards people who you disagree with.

By the same token, just because you are an ignorant forum member doesn't give you the right to be a tool toward people you disagree with. Perhaps you can heed your own advice?