Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
wow, some pretty decent players involved...
to GS Al Harrington Stephen Jackson Sarunas Jasikevicius Josh Powel to IND Troy Murphy Mike Dunleavy Ike Diogu Keith McLeod http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=2733891 |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
wow, some pretty decent players involved... |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
Being a GS fan i hate the deal...Jackson is overrated ontop of being an Ass. I don't like him as a player/person. Diogu i think could be a good player in the league for years to come. Dunleavy is way to inconsistent and Murphy is a tweener. I would rather have seen them trade Murph and Dunleavy for someone else. I like Harrington... And you get Al Harrington and even if you don't like him Jackson. I'd say you walked away in pretty good shape |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
So how do you hate the trade. You gave away 3 players that aren't any good in your opinion and one player thats not good now but has potential. |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
I would agree with you. Harrington would be an upgrade at PF, especially with the emergence of Biedrins at C, but I would want nothing to do with Jackson and you got two fillers to one. If Dunleavy for Maggette is also something in the future I like it even more for the Pacers. Murphy should be able to get a big man up top and give O'Neal some more space down low to work with.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
I would agree with you. Harrington would be an upgrade at PF, especially with the emergence of Biedrins at C, but I would want nothing to do with Jackson and you got two fillers to one. If Dunleavy for Maggette is also something in the future I like it even more for the Pacers. Murphy should be able to get a big man up top and give O'Neal some more space down low to work with. I can't see Maggette/Dunleavy going down. I'm pretty sure Dunleavy can't be traded again this season(Due to the closeness of the trade deadline) and Clippers brass(Mike Sr. not included) weren't all that enamored with that particular deal. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
No love for Sarunas? If it's a one for one deal I don't think it would matter. I thought Sr. is the one that wanted it? (nevermind misread your quote) |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
Why wouldn't he? The only reason he was still starting for the Pacers was because Daniels has showed very little. I guess this will also give him more of an opportunity now as well. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
Decent trade for both teams. If Indiana is smart they spin off Dunleavy for Maggette to get rid of Dunleavy's awful contract.
This move helps GS because they get players that better fit their system in Harrington/Jackson and have less years of bad contracts to pay. They are creating a big problem though when JRich comes back since he along with Ellis and Jackson all play the same spot. This move helps Indiana as well since gets a good young physical big (Diogu) and someone like Murphy who could offset the scoring lost with Harrington. They could also have a pretty deep bench with Graham/Dunleavy, Murphy and Diogu at the F/C spots although this move creates an even bigger hole at the guard spots for them. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|