Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
Appears like it's headed this way. Makes issues interesting just because a group might take on a large deal in an industry this season and make use of the term on him later. Or groups like Philly and Chicago can easily see if Brand and Boozer are worth keeping after milking yet another period out of these. Or their clause could be used by a team like Orlando to renounce Hedo, and then a good participant and industry Arenas to their clause could be used by another team, who on Arenas to open more room on their limit. Untradeable poor agreements could become tradeable--Toronto could get some thing of good use in exchange, and really go Bargnani. Given that they had be getting paid on the former agreements, and obviously the waived people could be liberated to sign for the minimal everywhere. Might lend it self to an unprecedented amount of player activity, which if nothing else will be interesting to look at.
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|