[i6mbwwdh]

//by the way....im interested to know which tamil actor has a good market in kerala//

All actors have their own market.For Eg Chandramukhi failed badly at kerala.Anniyan was a thumping success.Ghajini is a breakeven.But SIVAKASHI TOOK A HUGE INITIAL IE FIRST DAY HOUSE FULL.But slowly our audience will get bored by such films.So no special actors,Its movies.Kaakha Kaakha and Autograph did great job.

ABT CHANDRAMUKHI.R U STATING THAT U LIKED THE FILM ONLY BECAUSE OF CLIMAX? OK.IF NO ONE HAS SEEN MANICHITRATHAAZHU,THEY WILL SAY THE SAME.BUTITS IMPOSSIBLE NOW.

[gregmcal]

Originally Posted by nilavupriyan mohan lal did in his own style-underplay.but as the charecter is not so weighted his underplay doesnt appeal much.vishnuvardhan is good too.

but rajni made the film look so grand by making his own styles at the ending part of the film.but rajni had some similar manurisms of vishnuvardhan in the first half and some scenes

Super Nilavu Thambi...Rajini always adds grandeur to the movie. I liked Chandramukhi more than the other two just because of that reason... athu thaan Superb star pa superb star, lakalaklaklaklaklaklaklaklaka

[DrunkMans]

manichitrathazhu is a good movie overall....not boring at any point of time..

chandramukhi really bored to its limit in first half...especially the comedy track is irritating.........but at the end......as usual rajni's gimmicks made the movie a little interesting...

but for that climax....chandramukhi is great flop!only that climax made that movie a super duper hit according to me

I agree with u 100%, only the climax gave a lift to the movie. I am told manichitratazhu was DEF better. I am yet to watch it.

Vadivelu's character's presence made the movie WORST. I do understand rajni has added starvalue. IT COULD HAVE BEEN JUST RAJNI AND JYOTHIKA with no importance whatsoever to the Vadivelu's so called comedy, which actually pissed me off

[Hlennisal]

"For Eg Chandramukhi failed badly at kerala."

HUH? what was that? it was a clear hit in kerala, as widely reported both in English and Malyalam media. Think it was Mathrubhoomi magazine which did a story on the megasuccess of CM and Anniyan and kerala, urging mal filmmakers to look at the changing trends in audience tastes in kerala. i think it was a highly creditable show by CM considering it was the remake of a film every mal movie buff knows like his palms. more so, considering it released in kerala along with mohanlal's chandrolsavam (which eventually bombed).

about the quality of these three films, there's absolutely no denying that manichitrathaazhu is the best, any day though i found the CM climax the best of the lot - racy and very gripping.

CM worked coz it was a surprise for the general audience who came in expecting a typical rajni film... plus this was the film in which he returned to his core audience of families and women.

[GrolmangHat27]

I like Both mohanlal & Rajini both are superstar

Mohanlals range of acting is unbelievable.I dont think anybody in indian cinema can act like him in
different role's...He is the actor wich came out by his own way style and neutrality.
Lalettan He is the best...

About Rajini i am his fan from school days he’s the sort who deserves all the superstardom he’s earned. Such men, indeed, are rare...
his screen presence is Superb still now i have watching his films Firstday first show ..

My salute for both Great Actors

[carpartsho]

I like Both mohanlal & Rajini both are superstar

Mohanlals range of acting is unbelievable.I dont think anybody in indian cinema can act like him in
different role's...He is the actor wich came out by his own way style and neutrality.
Lalettan He is the best...

About Rajini i am his fan from school days he’s the sort who deserves all the superstardom he’s earned. Such men, indeed, are rare...
his screen presence is Superb still now i have watching his films Firstday first show ..

My salute for both Great Actors

YEAHHHHHH !!!!!

[AdobeCreativeSuite]

in chandramukhi the importance was to rajani, not to the story.

if u say in cm importance is to rajni,not to the story....what will u tell if u watch his other movies........chandramukhi is the one with a limited importance to rajni

[AssinHT]

in chandramukhi the importance was to rajani, not to the story.

[mr.calisto]

Take this...This is the way importance of characters in both this movies in descending order.

Manichitrathaazhu

SHOBHANA (Jyothika)
MOHANLAL (Rajini)
SURESH GOPI (Prabhu)
NEDUMUDI VENU (Nazar)
VINAYAPRASAD (Nayanthara)
Vinneth's Character
THILAKAN (Thanthri in CMukhi)
INNOCENT (Vadivelu)
SUDHEESH
KPAC LALITHA (Suvarna Mathew)

CHANDRAMUKHI

RAJINIKANTH...
Jyothika
Nayanthara
Vadivelu
Prabhu
Suvarna Mathew (Vadivelu's wife)
Sheela (Whats her role?????????)
Nazar
Thanthri
Vineeth

[Xbcofega]

good to know

[CaseyFronczek]

thats what i wrote mohanlal be the root and fruit

oh.....thats why he doesnt show any reactions in the name of under play in many scenes(as he is a tree)...just kidding.i know mohan lal's calibre

[AndyColemants]

without root there is no fruit. so mohanlal be the root and fruit.

[Duaceanceksm]

without root there is no fruit. so mohanlal be the root and fruit.

i know root is important.we talk what people like....root or fruit

[chujwduperjadzi]

Originally Posted by nilavupriyan Originally Posted by emiljose thats what i wrote mohanlal be the root and fruit

oh.....thats why he doesnt show any reactions in the name of under play in many scenes(as he is a tree)...just kidding.i know mohan lal's calibre perhaps you dont know who is mohan lal. i have seen the 3 films. and the other 2 heroes cant stant with lal's great performance. rajani and vishnu vardhan only shows some gimmicks for the masses.

and for your kind information mohan lal makes the appearence in the film just before interval. and he just rules after that.

it is not an underplayed character as you mentioned. hey...,im a mohanlal fan too.....,but in that film rajni really dominated the screen....thats what i have said....i know lal is a far better actor than the other two.

[Nabeqiv]

Originally Posted by emiljose thats what i wrote mohanlal be the root and fruit

oh.....thats why he doesnt show any reactions in the name of under play in many scenes(as he is a tree)...just kidding.i know mohan lal's calibre perhaps you dont know who is mohan lal. i have seen the 3 films. and the other 2 heroes cant stant with lal's great performance. rajani and vishnu vardhan only shows some gimmicks for the masses.

and for your kind information mohan lal makes the appearence in the film just before interval. and he just rules after that.

it is not an underplayed character as you mentioned.

[dserbokim]

manichitrathazhu is the root amd other two are branches same as mohanlal is the root and other two are branches.

fruit is at the branch..............so let rajni be the branch

[egershna]

Manichitraazhu (Malayalam) - Mohanlal (1993)
Apthamithra (Kannada) - Vishuvarthan (2004)
Chandramukhi (Tamil) - Rajinikanth (2005)

The above movies have the same story and concept. If you have watched all the three movies, can you share your experience on these actors performance and who will the best!

[AngelBee]

thats what i wrote mohanlal be the root and fruit

[Ambassador]

//i saw that movie in malayalam..indeed i accept Mohanlal did well..but Rajini in CM..Oh my God .... Mei silirithiruchu //


Mei silirithiruchu !!!.....Njangalude Kai (Hand) silsilirithiruchu...TO GIVE A SMACK ON THAT DIRECTOR P VASU and RAJINIKANTH.



//bay....,im a great kamal fan...but while rajni said "lakalakalaka"....i am on my feet//

Even we were also on our feet...TO RUN AWAY FROM THE THEATRE!!

[Sydrothcoathy]

manichitrathazhu is the root amd other two are branches same as mohanlal is the root and other two are branches.