LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 10-14-2005, 08:00 AM   #1
pongeystrhjst

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
718
Senior Member
Default
Lal Ow3ns Thatha
pongeystrhjst is offline


Old 10-19-2005, 06:16 AM   #2
Lt_Apple

Join Date
Dec 2008
Posts
4,489
Senior Member
Default
mohan lal did in his own style-underplay.but as the charecter is not so weighted his underplay doesnt appeal much.vishnuvardhan is good too.

but rajni made the film look so grand by making his own styles at the ending part of the film.but rajni had some similar manurisms of vishnuvardhan in the first half and some scenes
Super Nilavu Thambi...Rajini always adds grandeur to the movie. I liked Chandramukhi more than the other two just because of that reason...
Lt_Apple is offline


Old 10-19-2005, 06:19 AM   #3
doolarsva

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
498
Senior Member
Default
Originally Posted by nilavupriyan mohan lal did in his own style-underplay.but as the charecter is not so weighted his underplay doesnt appeal much.vishnuvardhan is good too.

but rajni made the film look so grand by making his own styles at the ending part of the film.but rajni had some similar manurisms of vishnuvardhan in the first half and some scenes
Super Nilavu Thambi...Rajini always adds grandeur to the movie. I liked Chandramukhi more than the other two just because of that reason... bay....,im a great kamal fan...but while rajni said "lakalakalaka"....i am on my feet
doolarsva is offline


Old 10-19-2005, 06:20 AM   #4
сайдинг

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
500
Senior Member
Default
Thalaivar thaan
сайдинг is offline


Old 10-19-2005, 06:22 AM   #5
BrandandGeneric

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
349
Senior Member
Default
Originally Posted by m_23_bayarea Originally Posted by nilavupriyan mohan lal did in his own style-underplay.but as the charecter is not so weighted his underplay doesnt appeal much.vishnuvardhan is good too.

but rajni made the film look so grand by making his own styles at the ending part of the film.but rajni had some similar manurisms of vishnuvardhan in the first half and some scenes
Super Nilavu Thambi...Rajini always adds grandeur to the movie. I liked Chandramukhi more than the other two just because of that reason... bay....,im a great kamal fan...but while rajni said "lakalakalaka"....i am on my feet You are an unbiased neutral fan. And I ought to respect you for that....Go Nilavu
BrandandGeneric is offline


Old 10-19-2005, 06:22 AM   #6
ddxbovMQ

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
342
Senior Member
Default
Thalaivar thaan
Thalaivar rocks !!!!

Vaazhga Veera Sivaji .....
ddxbovMQ is offline


Old 10-19-2005, 06:23 AM   #7
XinordiX

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
449
Senior Member
Default
Originally Posted by nilavupriyan Originally Posted by m_23_bayarea Originally Posted by nilavupriyan mohan lal did in his own style-underplay.but as the charecter is not so weighted his underplay doesnt appeal much.vishnuvardhan is good too.

but rajni made the film look so grand by making his own styles at the ending part of the film.but rajni had some similar manurisms of vishnuvardhan in the first half and some scenes
Super Nilavu Thambi...Rajini always adds grandeur to the movie. I liked Chandramukhi more than the other two just because of that reason... bay....,im a great kamal fan...but while rajni said "lakalakalaka"....i am on my feet You are an unbiased neutral fan. And I ought to respect you for that....Go Nilavu
XinordiX is offline


Old 10-19-2005, 06:29 AM   #8
steansathtpos

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
453
Senior Member
Default
i saw that movie in malayalam..indeed i accept Mohanlal did well..but Rajini in CM..Oh my God .... Mei silirithiruchu
steansathtpos is offline


Old 10-30-2005, 01:47 AM   #9
gardeniyas

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
566
Senior Member
Default
//i saw that movie in malayalam..indeed i accept Mohanlal did well..but Rajini in CM..Oh my God .... Mei silirithiruchu //


Mei silirithiruchu !!!.....Njangalude Kai (Hand) silsilirithiruchu...TO GIVE A SMACK ON THAT DIRECTOR P VASU and RAJINIKANTH.



//bay....,im a great kamal fan...but while rajni said "lakalakalaka"....i am on my feet//

Even we were also on our feet...TO RUN AWAY FROM THE THEATRE!!
gardeniyas is offline


Old 10-30-2005, 06:48 AM   #10
grosqueneen

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
443
Senior Member
Default
I dont know bout mohanlal cause Ive not seen the movie..(he is competant enough!)

I KNOW Rajinikant did well..

Vishnuvardan, I was told by my FRIEND, is not very impressive.
grosqueneen is offline


Old 10-31-2005, 05:26 PM   #11
uC4F0NVL

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
454
Senior Member
Default
I have seen all the three movies....

I will tell u what did these three actors (Actually I should say directors) did.

In MANICHITRATHAAZHU...FAZIL gave full space to Mohanlal to play the character.Mohanlal made the character grand and remembered (eventhough its coming a few mins before interval) only because of his natural acting.Plus The way Fazil and Madhu Muttam (scriptwriter) picturised the character.

In APNA MITHRA...P VASU picturised the doctor's role as a joker instead of eccentricity (Manichitrathaazhu) to get mass appeal.VISHNUVARDHAN thus had to come up with that role in sucha manner.So it wasn't impressive at all.Plus the main character of SOUNDARYA GOT MUCH MORE IMPORTANCE in the film than SHOBHANA got for Manichitrathaazhu.This is the difference b/w Apna Mithra and Mani... which shows that diff b/w Vishnu and Lal and Fazil and Vasu.Vishuvardhan is a good actor eventhough not great.He did reasonably a good job in Kauravar, a Mammotty Mal Film.

In CHANDRAMUKHI....That same P VASU directed it.This time intead of a joker,he made the character as a superhuman because of Rajini.Fights,Love songs,ability to dominate anything and above all that mind reading concept.Plus some vulgurous scenes.Rajini in his uasual superhero style made that character GRAND for Tamil audience but for his loyal Malayalee fans,he shown how a good film can be made bad.Because of this,the main character of JYOTHIKA lost its importance (actually it got more importance for a actress of Jyothika's calibre).This made chandramukhi Out and Out Rajini Masala Movie.

In Hindi,i am sure...There won't be any love story like chandramukhi because Big B is too old for it.And SRK should need a lot of importance.Now lets see whose film its gonna be.
uC4F0NVL is offline


Old 10-31-2005, 05:35 PM   #12
emexiagog

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
526
Senior Member
Default
//
I dont know bout mohanlal cause Ive not seen the movie..(he is competant enough!)

I KNOW Rajinikant did well..

Vishnuvardan, I was told by my FRIEND, is not very impressive.
//

COMPETANT ENOUGH TO MAKE A MOVIE BAD.THEN I WOULD SAY THAT HE IS NO WHERE NEAR TO RAJINIKANTH.SOMETIMES VISHUVARDHAN CAN HELP U.

EG - THENMAAVIN KOMBATHU - MUTHU
MANICHITRATHAAZHU - CHANDRAMUKHI
emexiagog is offline


Old 10-31-2005, 05:39 PM   #13
freeringsf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
501
Senior Member
Default
//mohan lal did in his own style-underplay.but as the charecter is not so weighted his underplay doesnt appeal much.vishnuvardhan is good too. //

FIRST TAKE A DICTIONARY AND UNDERSTAND THE MEANING OF UNDERPLAY!!!...IF U STILL BELIEVE IN THE SAME THEORY OF URS ABT UNDERPLAY,THEN SURYA AND VIKRAM WON'T SURVIVE IN TAMIL INDUSTRY.AND ABT THE MASS APPEAL OF LAL'S CHARACTER IN MANICHITRATHAAZHU,PLEASE CALL PRABHU,RAJINI AND P VASU.THEY WILL TELL U THAT THEY REMADE MANICHITRATHAAZHU ONLY BECAUSE OF THE MASS APPEAL OF THE FILM DUE TO MOHANLAL AND SHOBHANA AND PLUS SURESH GOPI.PLUS NOT TO FORGET FAZIL AND MADHU MUTTAM.
freeringsf is offline


Old 10-31-2005, 05:42 PM   #14
Wheldcobchoto

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
474
Senior Member
Default
GUYS..UR P VASU IS DOING THE SAME IN UR IDUSTRY JUST LIKE PRIYADARSHAN DOING IN BOLLYWOOD.INSPIRING FROM OLD MAL HITS (MOSTLY MOHANLAL) AND REMAKE IT INTO HINDI OR TAMIL and BECOME SUCCESSFUL THERE.
Wheldcobchoto is offline


Old 11-01-2005, 12:20 AM   #15
truportodfa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
376
Senior Member
Default
I have seen all the three movies....

I will tell u what did these three actors (Actually I should say directors) did.

In MANICHITRATHAAZHU...FAZIL gave full space to Mohanlal to play the character.Mohanlal made the character grand and remembered (eventhough its coming a few mins before interval) only because of his natural acting.Plus The way Fazil and Madhu Muttan (scriptwriter) picturised the character.

In APNA MITHRA...P VASU picturised the doctor's role as a joker instead of eccentricity (Manichitrathaazhu) to get mass appeal.VISHNUVARDHAN thus had to come up with that role in sucha manner.So it wasn't impressive at all.Plus the main character of SOUNDARYA GOT MUCH MORE IMPORTANCE in the film than SHOBHANA got for Manichitrathaazhu.This is the difference b/w Apna Mithra and Mani... which shows that diff b/w Vishnu and Lal and Fazil and Vasu.Vishuvardhan is a good actor eventhough not great.He did reasonably a good job in Kauravar, a Mammotty Mal Film.

In CHANDRAMUKHI....That same P VASU directed it.This time intead of a joker,he made the character as a superhuman because of Rajini.Fights,Love songs,ability to dominate anything and above all that mind reading concept.Plus some vulgurous scenes.Rajini in his uasual superhero style made that character GRAND for Tamil audience but for his loyal Malayalee fans,he shown how a good film can be made bad.Because of this,the main character of JYOTHIKA lost its importance (actually it got more importance for a actress of Jyothika's calibre).This made chandramukhi Out and Out Rajini Masala Movie.

In Hindi,i am sure...There won't be any love story like chandramukhi because Big B is too old for it.And SRK should need a lot of importance.Now lets see whose film its gonna be.
rahul....i also hated that love scenes,double meaning dialogues and stupid comedies in chandramukhi.....but what do u think about the climax of the movie?
truportodfa is offline


Old 11-01-2005, 04:40 AM   #16
wmhardware

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
462
Senior Member
Default
Clearly it is Thanga Thalaivar Super Star Rajinikanth!!
wmhardware is offline


Old 11-03-2005, 08:00 AM   #17
Flieteewell

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
397
Senior Member
Default
mohan lal did in his own style-underplay.but as the charecter is not so weighted his underplay doesnt appeal much.vishnuvardhan is good too.

but rajni made the film look so grand by making his own styles at the ending part of the film.but rajni had some similar manurisms of vishnuvardhan in the first half and some scenes
Flieteewell is offline


Old 11-07-2005, 04:23 PM   #18
RG3rGWcA

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
499
Senior Member
Default
//but what do u think about the climax of the movie?//

Hey Nilavupriyan...

At least accept this point that Chandramukhi didn't get its importance like Nagavalli.Its only because of Rajinikanth and his fans.The biggest drawback of the film is the importance given to Vadivelu and Nayanthara.

Abt Climax...It was nothing but a superhuman style of the Manichitrathaazhu climax.If the same would have done in Malayalam,It would have been booed down.Thats the difference.
RG3rGWcA is offline


Old 11-07-2005, 04:33 PM   #19
GypeFeeshyTes

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
594
Senior Member
Default
Hey Nilavupriyan....

I will tell the difference b/w Kerala audience and Tamil audience in another film.

HAVE U SEEN MAMMOTTY'S THE KING?
I mean the dubbed version.I heard it was a success in Tamil.

There is a typical bodylanguage of Mammotty where he swishes his back hair in his every frame (especially after the bombastic dialogue).That time Malayalee audience wasn't able to digest it.But in the dubbed version,All Tamil fans gave a big applause thats it.Now the same is happeneing to Malayalee audience
GypeFeeshyTes is offline


Old 11-07-2005, 04:39 PM   #20
leahjhburton

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
393
Senior Member
Default
//but what do u think about the climax of the movie?//

Hey Nilavupriyan...

At least accept this point that Chandramukhi didn't get its importance like Nagavalli.Its only because of Rajinikanth and his fans.The biggest drawback of the film is the importance given to Vadivelu and Nayanthara.

Abt Climax...It was nothing but a superhuman style of the Manichitrathaazhu climax.If the same would have done in Malayalam,It would have been booed down.Thats the difference.
heyy.....what do u think about rajni's fans...that guys will tear the screen if jyothika is given more importance than rajni...

manichitrathazhu is a good movie overall....not boring at any point of time..

chandramukhi really bored to its limit in first half...especially the comedy track is irritating.........but at the end......as usual rajni's gimmicks made the movie a little interesting...

but for that climax....chandramukhi is great flop!only that climax made that movie a super duper hit according to me

by the way....im interested to know which tamil actor has a good market in kerala
leahjhburton is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:27 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity