Reply to Thread New Thread |
05-30-2012, 05:48 AM | #21 |
|
disease brought on from the environment around us. please note, the translation 'affliction' below comes for the Pali word 'roga', which means disease Form, O monks, is not-self; if form were self, then form would not lead to affliction Feeling, O monks, is not-self; if feeling were self, then feeling would not lead to affliction Perception, O monks, is not-self; if perception were self, then perception would not lead to affliction Mental formations, O monks, are not-self; if mental formations were self, then mental formations would not lead to affliction Consciousness, O monks, is not-self; if consciousness were self, then consciousness would not lead to affliction The Discourse on the Not-self Characteristic |
|
05-30-2012, 05:57 AM | #22 |
|
I never saw this one either! And sadly, I think alot of Buddhists fail to see this teaching, or understand it. Many people in rural areas of Buddhist countries sometimes think that a sick man is sick, because of his past life Karma. But as you can see, even the Buddha had concluded something very scientific, and logical, to explain disease. How can so many people in the world miss these wonderful, logical, and scientific teachings? And to think, this all came from deeply looking at the world with no bias, and a clear and true intent to discover the truth of things. No science, no microscopes. Simply awareness of yourself, others, and the environment surrounding you.
|
|
05-30-2012, 06:15 AM | #23 |
|
|
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|