LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 11-27-2009, 03:24 PM   #1
Imampaictjg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
464
Senior Member
Default Volkswagen to F1
Volkswagen is seriously evaluating a move into Formula 1 as an engine supplier from 2012, when new power unit regulations due to be introduced could make the sport attractive enough for the German car maker to get involved... http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/80348
Imampaictjg is offline


Old 11-27-2009, 04:13 PM   #2
ftqwhbvxlcfop

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
526
Senior Member
Default
Well aside from GM (who obviously now don't have the funds to enter) VW have always been curiously absent from top flight motorsport. It would be nice to have more engines on the grid.
ftqwhbvxlcfop is offline


Old 11-27-2009, 04:36 PM   #3
Infellgedq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
Why is F1 the be all and end all? VAG in case you didn't notice has won Le Mans and the WTCC with some of the best designed diesel engines.
Infellgedq is offline


Old 11-27-2009, 05:13 PM   #4
russmodel

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
462
Senior Member
Default
I'd say VAG is more likely to enter the WRC than F1....
russmodel is offline


Old 11-27-2009, 05:21 PM   #5
Paybeskf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
509
Senior Member
Default
Powered by GTI
Paybeskf is offline


Old 11-27-2009, 05:24 PM   #6
Imampaictjg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
464
Senior Member
Default
Well, there was a report they were looking at NASCAR, swiftly denied, a few days ago.

It seems VW may be looking at the current downturn as an opportunity to step into motorsport while others are walking away.
Imampaictjg is offline


Old 11-27-2009, 05:26 PM   #7
Paybeskf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
509
Senior Member
Default
I dont see how they can afford to enter F1 in any form when they are making a huge loss every year. Doesnt make sense to me.
Paybeskf is offline


Old 11-27-2009, 05:29 PM   #8
frkksptn

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
442
Senior Member
Default
Under the Lamborghini name?

Would have been nice to see the German manufacturers battle it out in F1.
frkksptn is offline


Old 11-27-2009, 05:29 PM   #9
Infellgedq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
I'd say VAG is more likely to enter the WRC than F1....
Doubtful...would require a new car when the Polo comes out - you'd assume that would have to be the base car as the Scirocco is already too big. There's next to no coverage and very little exposure - that's why they went to do Dakar to promote their 4x4 vehicles.
Infellgedq is offline


Old 11-27-2009, 05:41 PM   #10
lopaayd

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
511
Senior Member
Default
From the Autosport story...I do like their attitude about preferring to be involved as an engine supplier rather than buying into, or buying out, a team like BMW, Renault, and now Mercedes have done.

I see talk of this "world engine" has popped up in this story again though...while I would welcome a common engine formula that allows engine manufacturers to create engines that can be used in a number of categories, I hope we don't end up with some sort of base engine riddled with common parts like Mad Max was suggesting a year or so ago
lopaayd is offline


Old 11-27-2009, 05:44 PM   #11
exchpaypaleg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
435
Senior Member
Default
Why is F1 the be all and end all? VAG in case you didn't notice has won Le Mans and the WTCC with some of the best designed diesel engines.
Oh come on, because it is the top level of motor racing.
Le Mans is great - in France and many racing enthusiasts! The WTCC amongst those that like to watch fast taxi cabs, but Formula 1 is the most difficult, the quickest and it is for the world drivers championship with an audience of hundreds of millions.

VW in F1 as an engine manufacturer and supplier is the way to go. Great to see Hans-Joachim Stuck as their representative
exchpaypaleg is offline


Old 11-27-2009, 05:50 PM   #12
Infellgedq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
You think not being in F1 has held back sales of the Polo and Golf? That's what VW cares about...they already have the brand.

Engine supply might be one way to build that in emerging markets but right now it would be difficult to justify the outlay.
Infellgedq is offline


Old 11-27-2009, 05:55 PM   #13
exchpaypaleg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
435
Senior Member
Default
From the Autosport story...I do like their attitude about preferring to be involved as an engine supplier rather than buying into, or buying out, a team like BMW, Renault, and now Mercedes have done.

I see talk of this "world engine" has popped up in this story again though...while I would welcome a common engine formula that allows engine manufacturers to create engines that can be used in a number of categories, I hope we don't end up with some sort of base engine riddled with common parts like Mad Max was suggesting a year or so ago
A standard engine would destroy formula 1 - unfortunately the socialization and rising nanny statism in the world today makes such a technical abomination in motor racing a real probability.

There is already a danger of creative geniuses like Adrian Newey leaving the sport. The cretins at the FIA must tread very carefully and hopefully Todt will not become a European politician-type.
exchpaypaleg is offline


Old 11-27-2009, 07:21 PM   #14
ftqwhbvxlcfop

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
526
Senior Member
Default
A standard engine would destroy formula 1 - unfortunately the socialization and rising nanny statism in the world today makes such a technical abomination in motor racing a real probability.

There is already a danger of creative geniuses like Adrian Newey leaving the sport. The cretins at the FIA must tread very carefully and hopefully Todt will not become a European politician-type.
As it goes St.D I agree with you - standard anything would be a terrible idea in F1 but how about you phrase it in a different way? We all know your views.
ftqwhbvxlcfop is offline


Old 11-27-2009, 07:54 PM   #15
adariseediups

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
414
Senior Member
Default
Hello,

I don't really understand how is f1 performance influencing a manufacturer's image. Just because toyota f1 team sucked I'm not going to buy their cars anymore? On the other hand, renault was pretty successful in f1, however I think they make pretty crappy cars...

and if they are so concerned about costs why don't they organize themselves like independents? Why can the f1 team be an independent entity that earns its own living (I spelled it leaving but mistake... the irony))?

regarding VW... I find their approach very... I don't know... SANE?
adariseediups is offline


Old 11-27-2009, 08:29 PM   #16
EzekelEnzino

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
742
Senior Member
Default
in the phrase, commonly used in the Indycar forum,... "Hans gets it."

Why buy the cow (team), when you can set the price for the milk (engines/powertrains).
EzekelEnzino is offline


Old 11-27-2009, 08:46 PM   #17
russmodel

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
462
Senior Member
Default
Doubtful...would require a new car when the Polo comes out - you'd assume that would have to be the base car as the Scirocco is already too big. There's next to no coverage and very little exposure - that's why they went to do Dakar to promote their 4x4 vehicles.
True, BUT the amount you would have to pump in to bankroll a title in the WRC is a lot less than to finish last in F1. WRC is a sport which is much loved the world round, it may be down in the doldrums now but add a few manufactuers, change the sporting regs and throw in some proper events and you've got a series which is going places.
russmodel is offline


Old 11-27-2009, 09:10 PM   #18
lopaayd

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
511
Senior Member
Default
in the phrase, commonly used in the Indycar forum,... "Hans gets it."

Why buy the cow (team), when you can set the price for the milk (engines/powertrains).
Indeed - I think a lot of manufacturers basically wanted to be Ferrari, with their name over the whole car, and I think some felt that just being an engine supplier didn't get them enough recognition when they won.

I don't agree though, I've lost count of the times I've heard stuff like "I want to drive a Renault when I'm older just like Nigel Mansell does in F1", "Montoya, is that the one who drives for BMW?", "Hamilton drives a Mercedes" etc. from people who aren't really fans but are aware of the sport and its competitors. And while real fans can tell the difference, do we care about a team being bought and renamed? As far as I'm concerned Benetton won a couple of titles in 2005 and 2006, with Renault engines.
lopaayd is offline


Old 11-27-2009, 10:42 PM   #19
LongaDonga

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
753
Senior Member
Default
Who sponsors the majority of VAG motorsports? Oh is it Red Bull? Do they have a team already in F1 which require customer engines? 1 + 1 = 2 Surely?
LongaDonga is offline


Old 11-27-2009, 11:56 PM   #20
maxtp

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
Who sponsors the majority of VAG motorsports? Oh is it Red Bull? Do they have a team already in F1 which require customer engines? 1 + 1 = 2 Surely?
bing bing we have a winner! ha, all of a sudden this looks very likely.

and im glad they are looking at engine supplying rather than team owning. right idea IMO.

and, another engine supplier is a good thing for F1, i think we need another.
maxtp is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:19 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity