LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 04-17-2009, 06:26 AM   #1
Ettiominiw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
697
Senior Member
Default Does the diffusers make overtaking notably harder?
Some people seems to think that the diffusers goes against the intention of the new rules to make it easier to follow/overtake other cars. I haven't thought about to much much myself, so I wonder if anyone here actually has noticed any difference in the first two races this season when cars have followed other cars with the diffuser compared to the ones without it?

I suppose we will know in a few months time anyway, but i would appreciate if some more knowledgeable people here on this board would share the thoughts they have so far regarding this.
Ettiominiw is offline


Old 04-17-2009, 06:48 AM   #2
U2DnBGFE

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
901
Senior Member
Default
maybe you can get an answer if you can give a definition of "notably harder".

Anyway cars without the DD diffuser are not as fast as the DD diffuser ones so they can not attempt to get cose to them and try to overtake, at least it didn't happen in the first 2 races.

However DD diffuser cars seem to be able to follow the other cars closely and even overtake them.

Another point is that from what I saw DD diffuser cars aren't really able to closely follow each other or overtake each other.

There were also cases where cars without the DD diffuser could follow each other closely and make a pass.

This being said the conclusion, based on the above, is that DD diffuser cars seem to be more difficult to pass than the ones that do not feature a DD diffuser.
U2DnBGFE is offline


Old 04-17-2009, 07:02 AM   #3
Ikrleprl

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
534
Senior Member
Default
Am i right in thinking that a deffusa, single or double is more a ground effect tool, like venturi tunnels. On a smaller scale.
If so i should not disturbe the air flow to much. I thought last years problem, was mainly caused by the low wide rear wings. And the high front wings.

Why not go back down the ground effects route. Close racing
Ikrleprl is offline


Old 04-17-2009, 10:15 AM   #4
Phoneemer

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
440
Senior Member
Default
Am i right in thinking that a deffusa, single or double is more a ground effect tool, like venturi tunnels. On a smaller scale.
If so i should not disturbe the air flow to much. I thought last years problem, was mainly caused by the low wide rear wings. And the high front wings.

Why not go back down the ground effects route. Close racing
Bingo!
Phoneemer is offline


Old 04-17-2009, 12:05 PM   #5
Usendyduexy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
660
Senior Member
Default
Nico says no
Usendyduexy is offline


Old 04-17-2009, 01:20 PM   #6
Svatudjw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
536
Senior Member
Default
YES!
Svatudjw is offline


Old 04-17-2009, 01:55 PM   #7
U2DnBGFE

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
901
Senior Member
Default
Nico says no
But he's no engineer, and he didn't even got close to trying to overtake any of the DD diffuser cars, which make his point nil and questions the logic behind his answer.
U2DnBGFE is offline


Old 04-17-2009, 03:02 PM   #8
Usendyduexy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
660
Senior Member
Default
nil? He is an F1 driver
Usendyduexy is offline


Old 04-17-2009, 03:37 PM   #9
HaseBeceDeemy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
410
Senior Member
Default
If it means that the cars produce more dirty wake, or the performance of the cars are affected more by the dirty wake of other cars, then the DDDs make overtaking harder.
HaseBeceDeemy is offline


Old 04-17-2009, 03:57 PM   #10
U2DnBGFE

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
901
Senior Member
Default
nil? He is an F1 driver
So what?
Maybe you should ask him to quantify the wake and turbulence produced by a diffuser!
He barely knows how it works and that it's used to produce downforce.

F1 drivers are not aerodynamicists or engineers, they are drivers.

PS: Why don't you tell me how exactly does Rosberg now if it's harder or not to pass a DD diffuser car given that he never passed one?
You keep calling teams desperate and whiners and so on, but when I confront you with any question that would make sense but wouldn't suit your biased POV you just ignore it. It does look like discussing isn't your interest, you only call others desperate without a basis.
U2DnBGFE is offline


Old 04-17-2009, 04:05 PM   #11
yatrahnualenu

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
477
Senior Member
Default
Actually didn't Rosberg train as an aerodynamicist before choosing racing?
yatrahnualenu is offline


Old 04-17-2009, 04:09 PM   #12
U2DnBGFE

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
901
Senior Member
Default
Actually didn't Rosberg train as an aerodynamicist before choosing racing?
According to Wikipedia he was offered a place for an aerodynamics course but he declined.
U2DnBGFE is offline


Old 04-17-2009, 04:11 PM   #13
Usendyduexy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
660
Senior Member
Default
I am sorry ioan. Silly me, to think that F1 drivers know more than forumers!
About BMW, I answered you in the another topic
Usendyduexy is offline


Old 04-17-2009, 04:14 PM   #14
U2DnBGFE

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
901
Senior Member
Default
I am sorry ioan. Silly me, to think that F1 drivers know more than forumers!
Maybe we should have a 'myth busters' thread, to dismantle such beliefs like F1 drivers designing the cars and being aerodynamics specialists among other things.
U2DnBGFE is offline


Old 04-17-2009, 04:18 PM   #15
Usendyduexy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
660
Senior Member
Default
Still, I think that they have some knowledge about the cars. Maybe I am naive...
Usendyduexy is offline


Old 04-17-2009, 04:20 PM   #16
Kafuuil

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
381
Senior Member
Default
Overtking is difficult in any catorgory when all the cars have similar power, grip, and putting cars in grid order tends to make passing difficult. We have had more passing this year thanks to variables in all those factors thanks to kers, tyre compounds etc. The only rteason a ddd car is harder to pass is its harder to make an error with more grip, so no one can get a run on the car ahead.
Kafuuil is offline


Old 04-17-2009, 04:35 PM   #17
U2DnBGFE

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
901
Senior Member
Default
Still, I think that they have some knowledge about the cars. Maybe I am naive...
Sure they have some knowledge but not to the point of making estimation about the wake and turbulence produced by different diffuser types.

The only way Rosberg would know if it's easier or more difficult to pass DD diffuser or simple diffuser cars would be if he tried to pass the same car once fitted with the DD diffuser and once with a simple diffuser, or that is impossible. Not to mention he never did come close to trying to pass another DD diffuser car.

Otherwise his opinion is just a guess or a way to protect his chances, which is in no way making it an objective opinion.
U2DnBGFE is offline


Old 04-17-2009, 04:59 PM   #18
Usendyduexy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
660
Senior Member
Default
Overtking is difficult in any catorgory when all the cars have similar power, grip, and putting cars in grid order tends to make passing difficult. We have had more passing this year thanks to variables in all those factors thanks to kers, tyre compounds etc. The only rteason a ddd car is harder to pass is its harder to make an error with more grip, so no one can get a run on the car ahead.
Yes, but maybe when all cars are DD, it will be the same as before.
Usendyduexy is offline


Old 04-17-2009, 05:39 PM   #19
Fruriourl

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
452
Senior Member
Default
I've thought about this topic a lot. And orignally I assumed it would make it more difficult. But reading up about it, as I'm no expert, I haven't been able to find any reliable sources which state it will make overtaking harder.

We have the opinion of people with vested interests, saying it will and it won't, but from all the technical articles I've come across, all seem to conclude that whilst the DDD weren't in mind when the rules were written, they don't actually go against the principle of the rule changes ..... i.e. increase overtaking.

If anyone can find a technical source showing it does halt overtaking, I'd be very interested to read it, as I haven't been able to find any.
Fruriourl is offline


Old 04-17-2009, 06:31 PM   #20
Ikrleprl

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
534
Senior Member
Default
Maybe this has nothing to do with it, but im going back to the good group C days.
Them cars ran with the biggest Venturi tunnels ive seen, ok not quite a deffusa, but from my limited knoladge, similar sort of thing.
Quite often, they could follow each other with there noses stuck up the arse of the car in front.
I belive that a DDDefusa car is only harder to overtake, because its slightly faster, with better downforce.

You look at the LMS now. Them cars are designed with aerodymaics, spoilers the shape of the car to produce the downforce, not ground effects like the group C days. And they struggle with the same thing as modem F1 cars, running close to each other.

I would love to go down the ground effects route again in F1, but can never see it happing, as it will produce a too high cornering speed, and if something goes wrong a big accident.
Ikrleprl is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:11 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity