Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#22 |
|
Storm in a Tea Cup?
Take with a pinch of salt? In one ear and out the other? Yep, that's what I'll do with this story. It's a bit of a non-event really. I guess it consists of 50% actual comments, 50% journalistic spin and 50% BS. (For those who noticed this is actually 140% then congratulations for being a Sun reader). |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
I saw this from Nigel Mansell and I just had to laugh. Yes, Nigel was a deserving champion, though to be quite frank he would have been a more deserving champion in '86 or '87 than in 1992 when he had what was a massively superior car, at a lot of tracks it was 2 seconds + quicker than anything else out there, add that to a team mate that was a dependable number 2 rather than any serious competition and it would have been damning if he hadnt had won the championship in '92. His justification of "beating 25 other cars" as opposed to the grids of 20 we have today is complete nonsense, if competition was judged on the number of competitors then NASCAR would be seen as the best series in the world, and whilst NASCAR is very entertaining and very popular in the states it doesnt have anywhere close to the international appeal of F1. Also if you look at the quality of the grids back in the early 90s a large portion of the grid were decidedly uncompetitive, particularly in '92 when you had a Brabham, Venturi and Scuderia Italia all on thier last legs and well past the point of being competitive and Andrea Moda, who were amongst the most inept teams in F1 history. I think winning a championship in today's ultracompetitive environment is as valid as ever before.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
There are some drivers, such as Hill, Hamilton and even Mansell himself, who forever attract comments along the lines of "he only won because he had the best car and no competition that year".
A viewpoint which completely disregards the effort required to get into that top team in the first place, and a team mate with equal equipment. If, on the other hand, Nige means that in 2008 Alonso and the Ferrari's weren't worthy competition, I'd up his medication. |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
Well Nigel was always described as a very balanced person. |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
|
"When I won the title, I beat 25 other cars. That makes Lewis' title 20 percent less credible than mine,"
![]() Good to have some fun. ![]() As for Mansell's career itself. I feel his "spectacular style" has a bit flattered the opinions of many F1 fans in retrospect (well, it's actually quite usual that 'exciting' drivers are a bit overrated compared to more 'calculating' ones). His record against team-mates doesn't make him look as impressive as he has stayed in people's memories. |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
|
Well Nigel was always described as a very balanced person. |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
|
http://en.f1-live.com/f1/en/headline...04101542.shtml |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|