Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
I think the livery is a vast improvement on the previous two seasons and the noticable change to Total also seems to fit nicely. I'm not as impressed with the fat nose cone they have chosen although I am sure there is some advantage maybe from the testing they have done. The fat nose doesn't seem to compliment the car the same way when compared to the Ferrari, Toyota and Mclaren designs. Aesthetically speaking I feel it is not as good looking but then again that does not necessarily win you races...
|
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
Looks to me like a package of KERS below the nose , nice and low for good stability and weight distribution .
Looks to me like a very robust wing attachment , to counteract any light touches , which are likely , with it's width . Looks heavy , like it has a coat on , which will be removed for the first race , so nobody sees the real design until it's too late . I don't think these launch machines look too close to what we'll see at the starting line , as , with all the regs changes , it makes more sense than most years , to keep one's cards very close to the vest .. |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
Elf is still on the engine cover. Maybe they use Total fuel and Elf lubricants. |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
|
Don't think so. It's way to high compared with the others who installed them under the fuel tank. Also so much weight in the nose cone would mean a very understeery car in slow corners. If its electrical , it should be possible to run it on the front brakes , and store it under the tank . I think the more interesting idea would be to try to get some gyroscopic action out of a horizontal version , perhaps under that nose , to try to keep the front of the car flat in those corners . Improving the control over pitch might help the understeering caused by the extra weight . As such , I don't think it's so far fetched , my friend . |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
That's a lot of, um, yellow on that car. Egg yolk yellow at that. Perhaps it will be an acquired taste . . . I really liked last year's color scheme. It astruck the right balance and was probably the nicest looking out there, save the Mclaren's now this yeas' liverly is as you said, too yellow and struggles to maintain a balance of contrast |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
|
Do we know which form of KERS the Renault team is using ? Using it one the front brakes would either mean having bulky front brake systems that would not fint into the front wheel, and thus heavily interfere with the car's aerodynamic or having axles that go onboard from the front wheels which would again interfere with the aeroplus would overcomplicate the front suspension geometry. Every team that uses electrical KERS are using it on the rear axles and the system is located together with the transmission casing. I think the more interesting idea would be to try to get some gyroscopic action out of a horizontal version , perhaps under that nose , to try to keep the front of the car flat in those corners . Improving the control over pitch might help the understeering caused by the extra weight . I'm not saying it's far fetched at all, just that it is impractical in a performance oriented race car where cornering stability and aerodynamics are the most important. |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|