Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
Remember those test cars were BMW's and there is no set of regulations under which BMW can make good looking cars. ![]() How come the McLaren rear wing looks wider and lower than the rest? |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
Due to their strength in mechanical grip I have viewed Williams as a possible dark horse for 2009 season. Obviously not as a championship or race win (on merit) candidate, but consistent points challenge and an odd podium could be achievable. There have been several doubts about Willy's financial situation due to uncertain future of their sponsors, some (Lenovo) have left too. But anyway, they seem ready to race and don't seem to have run out of sponsors either.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
Those bumps on the external side of the side pods look interesting. I wonder what is under them. What really gets me excited about Williams is their KERS program. It seems to be pretty promising. Per grandprix.com, their flywheel solution is twice as energy efficient as the batteries used by rival teams. Its output is said to be 100 kW even though they can only unleash 60 kW in 2009 because of the regulations. And its only 25 kg. If that's true, that is really promising, especially on the long term. This team deserves some success. http://www.grandprix.com/ns/ns21123.html http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/72865 |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
Agree, the McLaren and Williams are the best looking so far. Changed my mind about the Renault though |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
Good looking car given the 09 regulations. |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|