Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
sadly, this to me looks like a customer car deal.
Yes they aren't getting a chasis, but pretty much everything else either directly or via access to McLaren's suppliers. In effect Force India has become the McLaren B-team. It smacks of hypocrisy since they were one of the loudest opponents of the ProDrive deal as well as instrumental in their disapproval of the SuperAguri/Honda relationship. Now a year later all that is forgotten and they duly go ahead and forge a deal that is pretty much a combination of the superAguri and Prodrive deals. In essence I don't mind teams partnering on development etc. but I'm no fan of the b-team setups. ( I hope that STR finally do their own thing. It's ok for them to share an owner, but they should work separately) And I especially don't like teams that are instrumental in denouncing deals and measures then turn around and take advantage of that course of action for thier own benefit. Maybe with this deal they can move Sutil to Mercedes and Kovaleinen to Force India. One can only wish ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
Williams can't be too happy about this move. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
This is something that could happen having shown Colin Kowles the door.
VJ obviously viewed his stand and lawsuit over the customer car issue as antidisestablishmentarianism!!! ![]() Wait this has nothing to do with the Anglican Church being the state church of England ![]() I think I'm suffering from pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis! ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/72066
This outlines the partnership pretty well. McLaren are taking a proactive interest in FI and helping them get up the food chain. I don't think their goal of wins in 2010 are particularly unrealistic. With McLarens guidance, I am sure that a competitive Chassis can be developed and knowledge transfer of process and discipline will undoubtedly help FI. There could even be McLaren drivers coming up from FI for a year before driving for McLaren. Everything is within the Concord agreement and is completely different from supplying a specific B team with a car and getting them race it for you. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
This is worse than the Super Aguri case, as SAF1 was getting 1 year old technology and trying to develop it bit more.
Force India are looking to buy McLaren knowledge as they go. The only different thing is that they might build the cars themselves. This is what happens when corporatist people get into F1, they make a business out of it. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
This is worse than the Super Aguri case, as SAF1 was getting 1 year old technology and trying to develop it bit more. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
I'm surprsied at the number of people calling it a customer car. I've yet to see anything that suggests FI will be using McLaren designs for chassis and aero. I've no doubt that McLaren development knowledge is going to passed on, helping them avoid dead ends and improve the car, but this is only a more advanced form of the customer deal that WIlliams and Toyota currently have. After all, those two teams have shared a limited amount of data on transmission systems.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|