LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 11-03-2008, 02:33 AM   #1
spineeupsenry

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
453
Senior Member
Default Thanks Mr Kubica...
..for giving us the most climactic-anti-climactic last lap of a title deciding last race , (at least) I have ever witnessed.















Just what were you thinking?
spineeupsenry is offline


Old 11-03-2008, 12:14 PM   #2
Karensmith

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
573
Senior Member
Default
What the hell was that?
Could you imagine if it was Fred instead of the Kube?
Karensmith is offline


Old 11-03-2008, 12:19 PM   #3
BamSaitinypap

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
502
Senior Member
Default
Kubica drove slow and stupid today.
Unlapping himself in a precarious location in the midst of a WDC fight warranted at least an explanation to the stewards.

The man that made the last lap was Timo Glock.
BamSaitinypap is offline


Old 11-03-2008, 01:18 PM   #4
wrewsTear

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
401
Senior Member
Default
Kubica's driving = hilarious
He did make Felipe (and a billion others) think he had won the title though.

and this guy is supposed to be WDC material?

Jefe, welcome back!
wrewsTear is offline


Old 11-03-2008, 01:19 PM   #5
CealialactBek

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
525
Senior Member
Default
Imagine the uproar from the Ferrari crowd had he taken Vettel out.
Imagine the uproar from the McLaren crowd had he taken Hamilton out.
CealialactBek is offline


Old 11-03-2008, 01:29 PM   #6
Faigokilix

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
423
Senior Member
Default
Kubica drove slow and stupid today.
Unlapping himself in a precarious location in the midst of a WDC fight warranted at least an explanation to the stewards.

The man that made the last lap was Timo Glock.
He unlap himself just like Lewis in Japan.
Now RK is 4th in the final standings, I think?
Faigokilix is offline


Old 11-03-2008, 01:36 PM   #7
CealialactBek

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
525
Senior Member
Default
He unlap himself just like Lewis in Japan.
Not exactly, Hamilton unlapped a race leader, Kubica was still a lap down to Massa
Now RK is 4th in the final standings, I think? Kimi had more wins, so yes.
CealialactBek is offline


Old 11-03-2008, 02:12 PM   #8
BamSaitinypap

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
502
Senior Member
Default
He unlap himself just like Lewis in Japan.
Circumstances were completely different.

In Japan:
1. It was not raining
2. There was no traffic around Alonso
3. Hamilton was actually unlapping himself
4. The track was as wide as a runway
5. Hamilton's actions didn't affect the outcome of the race

In Brazil:
1. It was raining heavily
2. There was a direct fight for position and the WDC
3. Kubica was 40+ seconds behind Massa who he needed to pass to unlap himself (with 1 lap remaining) The last points position was another 5 second up the road.
4. The track is narrow.
5. Kubica's actions profoundly affected the outcome of the race and nearly the title with it.

Certainly warrants at least a reprimand IMO.

Now RK is 4th in the final standings, I think?
Yes he is, by virtue that Kimi has more wins.
BamSaitinypap is offline


Old 11-03-2008, 03:48 PM   #9
VogsHoock

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
524
Senior Member
Default
Heres the scene, the Brazilian GP, two laps to go at the end of this one, rain falling, Lewis Hamilton is trying to hold back Seb Vettel and Bobby Kubica is running with them but a lap down. For some reason after ruining his own race before it started by taking the mad decision to start on dry tyres on a soaking wet track (at least in the most part anyway) and finding himself a lap down he decides that the best course of action will be to unlap himself from the guys fighting in 5th & 6th places with no hope of ever catching the 1st placed man and hence unlapping himself. It smacks of intrerference from a man who has been outspoken on Hamilton's driving in recent times, his unlapping himself being a major contributing factor in Vettel passing Hamilton and almost handing Massa the championship. I am amazed that Kubica wasnt hauled infront of the stewards for this, had the rain not started to fall heavier on the last lap and crucially taking Glock's dry tyres out of thier operating window (by the way, a Glock conspiracy is complete nonsense perpetrated by people who have zero knowledge of how tempretire senstive the Bridgestone grooves truely are!) then he would have lost Hamilton a title he richly deserved.
VogsHoock is offline


Old 11-03-2008, 03:56 PM   #10
Apparpsmose

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
524
Senior Member
Default
If a lapped driver is faster than the car in front he is perfectly entitled to unlap himself if he so wishes.

I stand to be corrected here but a lapped driver is no different to any other driver fighting for position. The problem they have is if they do get by if they are not immediately faster they'll have to give way due to the blue flags.
Apparpsmose is offline


Old 11-03-2008, 03:58 PM   #11
softy54534

Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
5,457
Senior Member
Default
I think the rational behind a driver unlapping himself before the end of a race was discussed ad infinitum when Lewis Hamilton did just that. It was raining and getting heavier and who knows how the last lap would have unfolded? I did take note of the move and Robert did not hinder either driver. Vettel passed Hamilton because he was faster, and you can read all about it on Autosport's website. There was no way Hamilton could have held Vettel back, and, as McLaren themselves acknowledged, they were fighting Glock. Yes!! it's all on the various interviews reported on Autosport.

So let's not start a silly thread with a silly post, OK!!
softy54534 is offline


Old 11-03-2008, 04:03 PM   #12
Gintovtosik

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
623
Senior Member
Default
I must be missing something bleeding obvious and I appear to be firmly in a minority of one around here...but what exactly did Kubica do wrong?

He was a good few seconds a lap quicker than Vettel and Hamilton, and so unlapped himself, without any bonehead moves that threatened to take either of them out. What was the alternative, sit on their tail at a few seconds below his natural pace - and probably be MORE likely to cause an accident?

Yes it disturbed the flow of both drivers and allowed Vettel to make an opportunistic move for position, the last time I checked that was called motor racing.
Gintovtosik is offline


Old 11-03-2008, 04:21 PM   #13
mbaueee

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
447
Senior Member
Default
I must be missing something bleeding obvious and I appear to be firmly in a minority of one around here...but what exactly did Kubica do wrong?

He was a good few seconds a lap quicker than Vettel and Hamilton, and so unlapped himself, without any bonehead moves that threatened to take either of them out. What was the alternative, sit on their tail at a few seconds below his natural pace - and probably be MORE likely to cause an accident?

Yes it disturbed the flow of both drivers and allowed Vettel to make an opportunistic move for position, the last time I checked that was called motor racing.
Very good post. It was much better for everyone that Robert went past, anyway, what's he supposed to do, he was gaining 5-plus seconds per lap. Everyone needs to race hard until the finish in my opinion.
mbaueee is offline


Old 11-03-2008, 04:37 PM   #14
Beauseaccerce

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
443
Senior Member
Default
I think the rational behind a driver unlapping himself before the end of a race was discussed ad infinitum when Lewis Hamilton did just that. It was raining and getting heavier and who knows how the last lap would have unfolded? I did take note of the move and Robert did not hinder either driver. Vettel passed Hamilton because he was faster, and you can read all about it on Autosport's website. There was no way Hamilton could have held Vettel back, and, as McLaren themselves acknowledged, they were fighting Glock. Yes!! it's all on the various interviews reported on Autosport.

So let's not start a silly thread with a silly post, OK!!
That is what the Mac CEO tried to claim later--read Hamilton's comments right after the race. THEY were racing VETTEL, not Glock. LH makes that clear.

Indeed, from the pointo of view, who did what they had to do in this race....FM won and LH had to keep fifth place, but he did not because of SV.

It was mano mano between SV and LH with a WDC in the balance for the winner in the last ten laps----SV took him and owned him.

If Glock had not decided to give it all up on the last corner, then LH would not be WDC.

My vote for driver of the year......Vettel.

EVEN in a lucky Victory, Mac's very own CEO has to lie....
Beauseaccerce is offline


Old 11-03-2008, 06:11 PM   #15
SkHukV3N

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
455
Senior Member
Default
If a lapped driver is faster than the car in front he is perfectly entitled to unlap himself if he so wishes.

I stand to be corrected here but a lapped driver is no different to any other driver fighting for position. The problem they have is if they do get by if they are not immediately faster they'll have to give way due to the blue flags.
That's exactly what Eddie Ervine thought until Senna gave him a good smack.
SkHukV3N is offline


Old 11-03-2008, 06:43 PM   #16
SkHukV3N

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
455
Senior Member
Default
That is what the Mac CEO tried to claim later--read Hamilton's comments right after the race. THEY were racing VETTEL, not Glock. LH makes that clear.

Indeed, from the pointo of view, who did what they had to do in this race....FM won and LH had to keep fifth place, but he did not because of SV.

It was mano mano between SV and LH with a WDC in the balance for the winner in the last ten laps----SV took him and owned him.

If Glock had not decided to give it all up on the last corner, then LH would not be WDC.

My vote for driver of the year......Vettel.

EVEN in a lucky Victory, Mac's very own CEO has to lie....
Ron & Mclaren should seriously consider signing Vettel before Ferrari snatches him. Vettel's performance is utterly stunning considering he's driving a Team B Redbull powered by a much heavier Ferrari customer engine. I'm pretty sure Vettel will have no problem if the team fueled his tank heavy.
SkHukV3N is offline


Old 11-03-2008, 06:47 PM   #17
softy54534

Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
5,457
Senior Member
Default
Imagine the uproar from the Ferrari crowd had he taken Vettel out.
Imagine the uproar from the McLaren crowd had he taken Hamilton out.
Imagine the uproar if he had taken Britney Spears out!
softy54534 is offline


Old 11-03-2008, 08:40 PM   #18
T5qYkHWQ

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
429
Senior Member
Default
I must be missing something bleeding obvious and I appear to be firmly in a minority of one around here...but what exactly did Kubica do wrong?

He was a good few seconds a lap quicker than Vettel and Hamilton, and so unlapped himself, without any bonehead moves that threatened to take either of them out. What was the alternative, sit on their tail at a few seconds below his natural pace - and probably be MORE likely to cause an accident?

Yes it disturbed the flow of both drivers and allowed Vettel to make an opportunistic move for position, the last time I checked that was called motor racing.
Exactly and also it would have made him grin as it would have upset Lewis who Robert is not too fond of. Called motor racing BUT all this pathetic interferance that people now want, rulings on everything is care of the FIA ruling on everything ( if a Mclaren or Ferrari are involved usually ) . It is the modern, precious world.
T5qYkHWQ is offline


Old 11-03-2008, 08:43 PM   #19
wMceqj7F

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
Ron & Mclaren should seriously consider signing Vettel before Ferrari snatches him. Vettel's performance is utterly stunning considering he's driving a Team B Redbull powered by a much heavier Ferrari customer engine. I'm pretty sure Vettel will have no problem if the team fueled his tank heavy.
Never mind considering it, Ron should be camping on Seb's doorstep with a bunch of flowers and a box of chocolates right now.
wMceqj7F is offline


Old 11-04-2008, 01:18 AM   #20
ChyFDjfed

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
466
Senior Member
Default
Well done Kubica
ChyFDjfed is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:42 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity