Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
He unlap himself just like Lewis in Japan. In Japan: 1. It was not raining 2. There was no traffic around Alonso 3. Hamilton was actually unlapping himself 4. The track was as wide as a runway 5. Hamilton's actions didn't affect the outcome of the race In Brazil: 1. It was raining heavily 2. There was a direct fight for position and the WDC 3. Kubica was 40+ seconds behind Massa who he needed to pass to unlap himself (with 1 lap remaining) ![]() 4. The track is narrow. 5. Kubica's actions profoundly affected the outcome of the race and nearly the title with it. Certainly warrants at least a reprimand IMO. Now RK is 4th in the final standings, I think? |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
Heres the scene, the Brazilian GP, two laps to go at the end of this one, rain falling, Lewis Hamilton is trying to hold back Seb Vettel and Bobby Kubica is running with them but a lap down. For some reason after ruining his own race before it started by taking the mad decision to start on dry tyres on a soaking wet track (at least in the most part anyway) and finding himself a lap down he decides that the best course of action will be to unlap himself from the guys fighting in 5th & 6th places with no hope of ever catching the 1st placed man and hence unlapping himself. It smacks of intrerference from a man who has been outspoken on Hamilton's driving in recent times, his unlapping himself being a major contributing factor in Vettel passing Hamilton and almost handing Massa the championship. I am amazed that Kubica wasnt hauled infront of the stewards for this, had the rain not started to fall heavier on the last lap and crucially taking Glock's dry tyres out of thier operating window (by the way, a Glock conspiracy is complete nonsense perpetrated by people who have zero knowledge of how tempretire senstive the Bridgestone grooves truely are!) then he would have lost Hamilton a title he richly deserved.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
If a lapped driver is faster than the car in front he is perfectly entitled to unlap himself if he so wishes.
I stand to be corrected here but a lapped driver is no different to any other driver fighting for position. The problem they have is if they do get by if they are not immediately faster they'll have to give way due to the blue flags. |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
I think the rational behind a driver unlapping himself before the end of a race was discussed ad infinitum when Lewis Hamilton did just that. It was raining and getting heavier and who knows how the last lap would have unfolded? I did take note of the move and Robert did not hinder either driver. Vettel passed Hamilton because he was faster, and you can read all about it on Autosport's website. There was no way Hamilton could have held Vettel back, and, as McLaren themselves acknowledged, they were fighting Glock. Yes!! it's all on the various interviews reported on Autosport.
So let's not start a silly thread with a silly post, OK!! |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
I must be missing something bleeding obvious and I appear to be firmly in a minority of one around here...but what exactly did Kubica do wrong?
He was a good few seconds a lap quicker than Vettel and Hamilton, and so unlapped himself, without any bonehead moves that threatened to take either of them out. What was the alternative, sit on their tail at a few seconds below his natural pace - and probably be MORE likely to cause an accident? Yes it disturbed the flow of both drivers and allowed Vettel to make an opportunistic move for position, the last time I checked that was called motor racing. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
I must be missing something bleeding obvious and I appear to be firmly in a minority of one around here...but what exactly did Kubica do wrong? |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
I think the rational behind a driver unlapping himself before the end of a race was discussed ad infinitum when Lewis Hamilton did just that. It was raining and getting heavier and who knows how the last lap would have unfolded? I did take note of the move and Robert did not hinder either driver. Vettel passed Hamilton because he was faster, and you can read all about it on Autosport's website. There was no way Hamilton could have held Vettel back, and, as McLaren themselves acknowledged, they were fighting Glock. Yes!! it's all on the various interviews reported on Autosport. Indeed, from the pointo of view, who did what they had to do in this race....FM won and LH had to keep fifth place, but he did not because of SV. It was mano mano between SV and LH with a WDC in the balance for the winner in the last ten laps----SV took him and owned him. ![]() If Glock had not decided to give it all up on the last corner, then LH would not be WDC. My vote for driver of the year......Vettel. EVEN in a lucky Victory, Mac's very own CEO has to lie.... |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
If a lapped driver is faster than the car in front he is perfectly entitled to unlap himself if he so wishes. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
That is what the Mac CEO tried to claim later--read Hamilton's comments right after the race. THEY were racing VETTEL, not Glock. LH makes that clear. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
I must be missing something bleeding obvious and I appear to be firmly in a minority of one around here...but what exactly did Kubica do wrong? |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
Ron & Mclaren should seriously consider signing Vettel before Ferrari snatches him. Vettel's performance is utterly stunning considering he's driving a Team B Redbull powered by a much heavier Ferrari customer engine. I'm pretty sure Vettel will have no problem if the team fueled his tank heavy. ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|