Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#22 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
It's a piece of cake for Lewis now, and I suppose that RD will be smart enough not to push him to fight for the constructors championship points where Ferrari leads by 11 points anyway. It's not as easy as it sounds. The win in China was 1 step closer to WDC for Lewis. All Lewis needs to do is a solid result by bringing the car home by staying out of trouble. I was just thinking about Nicolas Minassian at the last LMS where he lost the title because of a contretemps with a backmarker and scored a DNF despite dominating the championship. Massa needs a win and DNF from Hamilton. I think there's still a WDC up for grabs for Massa. |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
I'm just being realistic about the chances.
Massa had his biggest chance in Singapore but the team managed to throw it away in a royal way. Them saying that all they need was three 1-2 finishes was laughable given the current competitiveness of the field. Ferrari has a good chance to walk away with the WCC title and try again next season. To win the WDC they need a miracle, IMO. |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
I'm just being realistic about the chances. |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
Who could beat him?
Massa and Kimi are probably gonna get 1-2 bar any problems. Kubica could get ahead, Alonso might. Heidfeld may if he qualifies high, same with Vettel or Trulli. So I think he really has to go for it - not on the limit, but as close as possible as he doesn't want to end up scrapping for 5th with Nick and Jarno. |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
Lewis is a "wild horse" you can't tell him, go there, put yourself in 5th pos and keep it for the whole race no matter what. No he needs to go there and race like he did in all races so far, with his talent and a bit luck the title will be his. I don't think we will se the same movie we saw last year... |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
|
McLaren need to see how things play out during practice and qualifying, and be prepared to run up front. If they are close, fuel both cars light, control the start, and have Kovalainen slow up the Ferraris while Lewis builds up a sizable lead.
If Ferrari looks like it will be too quick, it's still important for Heike to be near Hamilton, to keep Alonso at bay. Fernando is the real concern here and I can see him fueling light in order to stay in the mix. He REALLY doesn't want Lewis to win. On the other hand, Kimi couldn't give a toss if Massa wins. Fortunately, he is no Senna (neither is Alonso), so I think everyone will behave themselves at the start. |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
|
McLaren need to see how things play out during practice and qualifying, and be prepared to run up front. If they are close, fuel both cars light, control the start, and have Kovalainen slow up the Ferraris while Lewis builds up a sizable lead. Funny how Fernando's up at the front again when Lewis needs to take the title ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
Lewis is a "wild horse" you can't tell him, go there, put yourself in 5th pos and keep it for the whole race no matter what. No he needs to go there and race like he did in all races so far, with his talent and a bit luck the title will be his. I don't think we will se the same movie we saw last year... |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
|
So there is definitely still tension between Fernando. ![]() Fred and Lewis will have an adversarial relationship for the rest of their f1 careers. (Even when they're both driving for Ferrari) ![]() They are both too absurdly rich and adored by their respective fans to have it mean any more than that! Let's stay away from the tabloid aspect of this race. There are other pilots that have their own adversaries. Those however simply don't sell fish-wraps! Sponge Bob alone has to have a box full. ![]() Funny how Fernando's up at the front again when Lewis needs to take the title That, or a lot of carnage! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|