LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 10-03-2007, 07:09 PM   #1
Suvaxal

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
515
Senior Member
Default Should Ferrari be banned ...
From grandprix.com


In recent days we have received (unsolicited) communication from Nigel Stepney which raises a number of questions which have not been touched on in the scandal to date. Stepney says that he believes Ferrari have been let off surprisingly lightly by the FIA. He says that there is a point that everyone is missing because they are assuming that the flow of information to Mike Coughlan was a one-way flow and that Ferrari did not gain anything. There is no evidence at all that Stepney was being paid to pass on information and he says that it was rather more simple than that.
"I got information about when they [McLaren] were stopping," Stepney says. "I got weight distribution, I got other aspects of various parts of their car from him [Coughlan]. Ferrari got off very lightly. I was their employee at the time. I was aware of certain stuff they were doing at tests, fuel levels, for example. I knew what fuel level they were running. I think they should have been docked points personally. The question is: Did I use the information, did I talk about it?' That's the big question. I spoke to some people about it. I can't prove it, there are no e-mails or anything. Points about the fuel and the differences [between Ferrari and McLaren] were discussed inside. As well as McLaren having an advantage, did Ferrari have an advantage? I think so."
So is Stepney surprised that Ferrari got off entirely without penalty?
"Very surprised," he says. "It looks like information flowing only one way. No one has been balancing the argument. No one has asked the question. They were thinking Mike was asking the questions and I was answering them."
Stepney, one can argue, is a source that is seen to be somewhat tainted given all the allegations that have been made in Italy. But they are only allegations at the moment. Nothing has been proved in a proper court of law and until it is he has as much right to make his feelings known as Montezemolo.
Suvaxal is offline


Old 10-03-2007, 07:19 PM   #2
layevymed

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
503
Senior Member
Default
From grandprix.com


In recent days we have received (unsolicited) communication from Nigel Stepney which raises a number of questions which have not been touched on in the scandal to date. Stepney says that he believes Ferrari have been let off surprisingly lightly by the FIA. He says that there is a point that everyone is missing because they are assuming that the flow of information to Mike Coughlan was a one-way flow and that Ferrari did not gain anything. There is no evidence at all that Stepney was being paid to pass on information and he says that it was rather more simple than that.
"I got information about when they [McLaren] were stopping," Stepney says. "I got weight distribution, I got other aspects of various parts of their car from him [Coughlan]. Ferrari got off very lightly. I was their employee at the time. I was aware of certain stuff they were doing at tests, fuel levels, for example. I knew what fuel level they were running. I think they should have been docked points personally. The question is: Did I use the information, did I talk about it?' That's the big question. I spoke to some people about it. I can't prove it, there are no e-mails or anything. Points about the fuel and the differences [between Ferrari and McLaren] were discussed inside. As well as McLaren having an advantage, did Ferrari have an advantage? I think so."
So is Stepney surprised that Ferrari got off entirely without penalty?
"Very surprised," he says. "It looks like information flowing only one way. No one has been balancing the argument. No one has asked the question. They were thinking Mike was asking the questions and I was answering them."
Stepney, one can argue, is a source that is seen to be somewhat tainted given all the allegations that have been made in Italy. But they are only allegations at the moment. Nothing has been proved in a proper court of law and until it is he has as much right to make his feelings known as Montezemolo.
IF you can prove without a doubt that they are just as indictable as the FIA think McLaren are, then, absolutely yes. As much as it grates on me though, I think enough damage has been done to the 'sport' of F1, and I think an agreement should be made to lift the carpet at the FIA headquarters, and sweep this whole sorry saga under it, and stop it all right now.
layevymed is offline


Old 10-03-2007, 07:25 PM   #3
enfoires

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
527
Senior Member
Default
Yep, take their points away and fine them a $ 100 millions if they are proved to have done the same as McLaren did.

F1 needs a huge blow to clean itself. Don't you worry, it will survive, become a sport again and maybe they won't do the same mistakes again.
enfoires is offline


Old 10-03-2007, 07:56 PM   #4
SDorothy28

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
571
Senior Member
Default
F1 needs a huge blow to clean itself. Don't you worry, it will survive, become a sport again and maybe they won't do the same mistakes again.
I think what's happened has served as a huge wake-up call, but transfers of information in one way or another will always go on, if not in the form of that from Ferrari to McLaren (and maybe the other way).
SDorothy28 is offline


Old 10-03-2007, 08:14 PM   #5
enfoires

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
527
Senior Member
Default
I think what's happened has served as a huge wake-up call, but transfers of information in one way or another will always go on, if not in the form of that from Ferrari to McLaren (and maybe the other way).
Information is exchanged when engineers change teams, but when the info changes hand without employee transfer it is illegal because the information leak goes on for as long as it isn't found out and the infos are always up to date, which isn't the case when we talk about employees leaving to work for another team.
enfoires is offline


Old 10-03-2007, 09:31 PM   #6
Pharmaciest

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
426
Senior Member
Default
Information is exchanged when engineers change teams, but when the info changes hand without employee transfer it is illegal because the information leak goes on for as long as it isn't found out and the infos are always up to date, which isn't the case when we talk about employees leaving to work for another team.
I'd agree with that as long as we are talking about information in their heads and not on CD's. Unfortunatly, the reality is rather different.

Every team on the grid has been guilty to some extent of what McLaren were done for. OK, a 700 page manual is pretty comprehensive but what about a set of aero schematics or an engine blueprint instead. Whenever anyone moves to a competitor, they usually stuff what they can down their pants.

I believe NS in this case because it is not only plausible but logical that they were sharing data. We all know in our heart of hearts that it goes on but Max had an axe to grind and grind it he did.

I think it's time to put a line underneath this thing for the good of the sport. I'm not happy that McLaren were dealt with this way but I see no benefit whatsoever in exposing Ferrari and Renault in the same manner. It was a bitter pill that has been swallowed and for the good of F1, I hope it ends there and no other team is dragged through the mire.
Pharmaciest is offline


Old 10-03-2007, 09:38 PM   #7
fygESytT

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
494
Senior Member
Default
If a basis for credibility is found, I think McLaren should have their points restored and the fine lifted. Then McLaren and Ferrari could both be fined, say $5 million each and have all the teams admonished that this sort of thing will stop, now.

Possibly Stepney himself told Coughlan that the sliding floor was designed to pass the static test that the FIA was using at the time but if the FIA knew how it really worked, they would ban it. You could argue that Ferrari intentionally used an illegal device, like Toyota's rally air intake.

However, since it did pass the FIA tests at the time, it is wrong to say it was illegal or cheating on the part of Ferrari.
fygESytT is offline


Old 10-03-2007, 09:52 PM   #8
layevymed

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
503
Senior Member
Default
Nigel Stepney is the most dishonest, unreliable witness a prosecution could get.
He should become a lawyer then!!
layevymed is offline


Old 10-03-2007, 10:18 PM   #9
enfoires

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
527
Senior Member
Default
If a basis for credibility is found, I think McLaren should have their points restored and the fine lifted. Then McLaren and Ferrari could both be fined, say $5 million each and have all the teams admonished that this sort of thing will stop, now.
If it is proved that Ferrari used McLaren data to the same extent as McLaren did with the Ferrari data than Ferrari should also lose their points and get the hefty fine.
5 millions is no where a hard enough fine to stop them cheating for the win when money they receive for winning is way more than that.
enfoires is offline


Old 10-03-2007, 10:29 PM   #10
Pharmaciest

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
426
Senior Member
Default
If we carry on down this route, there is a good chance that Lewis will be WDC in his first year and Spyker the WCC in theirs
Pharmaciest is offline


Old 10-03-2007, 10:30 PM   #11
actioliGalm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
439
Senior Member
Default
If any of this is true, then Ferrari should be held to account.

However, since it comes from a bloke who states he has no evidence, who has already been sacked by the Scuderia and accused of sabotage and handing classified information to a main rival, which has been confirmed by that rival organisation, the chances of him being a credible witness are somewhat remote.

Nigel Stepney is the most dishonest, unreliable witness a prosecution could get.
Probably an understatement of his credibility at this stage


However, there is the question as to any verfiable email traffic and the content of the messages, that could be independantly demonstrated to have this type of information flow such as the FA emails where the content was actually available

the article seems to suggest that there is not, but that is not clear and seems based on NS statements in the article, that there is not.......
actioliGalm is offline


Old 10-03-2007, 11:01 PM   #12
Pelefaifs

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
495
Senior Member
Default
If it is proved that Ferrari used McLaren data to the same extent as McLaren did with the Ferrari data than Ferrari should also lose their points and get the hefty fine.
5 millions is no where a hard enough fine to stop them cheating for the win when money they receive for winning is way more than that.
No .
If it's true , and as damning a dossier of evidence , they should be thrown out , along with McLaren .
Fines do nothing . Chuck both and send a real message .

Let them come back next year , and forget about the stupid suggestion that either be checked for the other's intellectual property or parts .

But , let's find out if this isn't just an accused thief throwing red herrings at us .
Let's see those e-mails and text messages , too . We know how fond these guys are of electronic communication .
Pelefaifs is offline


Old 10-03-2007, 11:21 PM   #13
spoddersedpn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
613
Senior Member
Default
If it is proved that Ferrari used McLaren data to the same extent as McLaren did with the Ferrari data than Ferrari should also lose their points and get the hefty fine.
5 millions is no where a hard enough fine to stop them cheating for the win when money they receive for winning is way more than that.
Good post... there's always been more than one team's employees involved in this scandal !!!

Although I am not surprised... if no money changed hands...

then a Quid Quo Pro is likely !!!

spoddersedpn is offline


Old 10-03-2007, 11:30 PM   #14
elossenen

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
410
Senior Member
Default
gee then who is the real champion??????
elossenen is offline


Old 10-04-2007, 12:12 AM   #15
fygESytT

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
494
Senior Member
Default
You know, as more teams use wind tunnels and computers to design their cars, sooner or later it's going to end up being a nearly identical car. Airfow doesn't lie.
fygESytT is offline


Old 10-04-2007, 12:16 AM   #16
layevymed

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
503
Senior Member
Default
You know, as more teams use wind tunnels and computers to design their cars, sooner or later it's going to end up being a nearly identical car. Airfow doesn't lie.
Indeed, as more components are standardised that will become more so the case. The subtle differences being borne of the need to package engines/cooling etc in different ways for the different geometries.
layevymed is offline


Old 10-04-2007, 01:41 AM   #17
enfoires

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
527
Senior Member
Default
I thought this thread is about how Ferrari should be banned following these "last moment revelations" from Nigel Stepney that are made public by www.grandprix.com who's editor couldn't refrain from completing Nigel's empty threats with some precious (read biased) [indications].

I take a look and what do I find? A playground! We got to the point where McLaren fans are accusing Spyker that they did what the McCheats were doing this season. All this without the slightest proof (because ones thoughts and dreams are rarely facts)!
enfoires is offline


Old 10-04-2007, 01:58 AM   #18
Obgrfbke

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
457
Senior Member
Default
I thought this thread is about how Ferrari should be banned following these "last moment revelations" from Nigel Stepney that are made public by www.grandprix.com who's editor couldn't refrain from completing Nigel's empty threats with some precious (read biased) [indications].


This thread is about Stepneys comments, not about Spyker or it's designer. Keep it that way.
Obgrfbke is offline


Old 10-04-2007, 02:03 AM   #19
enfoires

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
527
Senior Member
Default
Wow, nice and clean!
enfoires is offline


Old 10-04-2007, 02:48 AM   #20
spoddersedpn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
613
Senior Member
Default
Hey Ioan,

Stepney's confession... that he accepted McLaren's technical information and shared it with his fellow workers while still employed with Ferrari...

Simply tosses Ferrari into the same mud wrestling pit as McLaren by...

Bringing the sport into "Disrepute" !!!

Now... what's Mad Max and Bernie gonna do with an Extra 100 Million ???

spoddersedpn is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:21 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity