Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
Some staff members and commissioners of the Sept. 11 panel concluded that the Pentagon's initial story of how it reacted to the 2001 terrorist attacks may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the public rather than a reflection of the fog of events on that day, according to sources involved in the debate. 9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
Some staff members and commissioners of the Sept. 11 panel concluded that the Pentagon's initial story of how it reacted to the 2001 terrorist attacks may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the public rather than a reflection of the fog of events on that day, according to sources involved in the debate. 9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
It really is amazing how no member of the military has been called on the carpet for the incredible FUBAR'd response of the military on 9-11-01. Even before that day planes ROUTINELY intercepted planes that are off course or entering restricted air space. Yet that day it didn't happen. Why? |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
You beat me to it. I was also going to point out how you can no longer track planes who have turned their transponders off. In addition, when a plane drops off radar, standard procedure is for air traffic controllers to contact other towers to see if they have them on radar and they methodically & calmly go about trying to locate the plane even if they suspect it crashed. Not being able to intercept and chasing a phantom plane doesn't seem odd to me under the circumstances of 9/11. But there are hints at other discrepancies in the news article that may not be normal.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
You beat me to it. I was also going to point out how you can no longer track planes who have turned their transponders off. In addition, when a plane drops off radar, standard procedure is for air traffic controllers to contact other towers to see if they have them on radar and they methodically & calmly go about trying to locate the plane even if they suspect it crashed. Not being able to intercept and chasing a phantom plane doesn't seem odd to me under the circumstances of 9/11. But there are hints at other discrepancies in the news article that may not be normal.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
The purpose of this article is to whitewash the entire thing and, of course, blame 9/11 on the incompetence of NORAD. .. Its the Blame Game once again! :shock:
The NORAD tapes, far from dissolving so-called "conspiracy theories," only serve to support the weight of evidence that points directly towards a deliberate plan on that day to make the air defenses of the US impotent and to enable the planes to find their targets. But, thats just my personal opinion! |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
The purpose of this article is to whitewash the entire thing and, of course, blame 9/11 on the incompetence of NORAD. .. Its the Blame Game once again! :shock:
The NORAD tapes, far from dissolving so-called "conspiracy theories," only serve to support the weight of evidence that points directly towards a deliberate plan on that day to make the air defenses of the US impotent and to enable the planes to find their targets. But, thats just my personal opinion! |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
What I got from the NORAD tapes was that until members actually saw planes hit on their TV's they thought was an exercise. Interesting Stuff. I like the ladies talking about it being an actual hijacking, and one of them saying..."cool!". |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
The purpose of this article is to whitewash the entire thing and, of course, blame 9/11 on the incompetence of NORAD. .. Its the Blame Game once again! :shock: |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|