LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 10-30-2009, 12:13 PM   #1
Lillie_Steins

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
4,508
Senior Member
Default Hitler And The BNP
Don't worry, Griffin is growing up and ditching the views he was brainwashed into as a youth, he has taken an old far-right party and is in the process of reforming it. He has made it clear that he now accepts that the Holocaust happened and also that in his opinion Jews should be exempted from all immigration laws to encourage more Jews to settle in the UK, in order to redress the balance in a Judao-Christian society which has admitted millions of Muslims; many of whom want to change the country to suit their own religion.

Like Geert Wilders he does not 'hate' Muslims he hates the attempt by a cabal of liberal parties in Europe to conspire with Islamists to bring Sharia law into the UK and Europe and to undermine Britishness and Englishness by creating a European Superstate devolved to multicultural 'stans.'

The BNP was the only party to support Israel in Gaza, while the people demonstrating against the BNP support the genuinly fascist Hamas and Hezbollah.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYBWd6ZT0Ns
Lillie_Steins is offline


Old 10-30-2009, 03:03 PM   #2
S.T.D.

Join Date
May 2008
Age
42
Posts
5,220
Senior Member
Default
I hate anti-semites but I'd be willing to back the BNP if it meant giving the muslims a blood nose in the UK. I'd also bet that there'd be popular support for a route of the muslims but only fringe support for any anti-Jewish activity.

All the same..................if these folks haven't worked out that the real threat to them is the clear & present danger of Islam and not some stupid, discredited czarist/nazi/kkk fantasy about "joo bankers" then they're insane.
S.T.D. is offline


Old 01-22-2010, 11:52 AM   #3
LottiFurmann

Join Date
Jan 2008
Posts
4,494
Senior Member
Default
Nick Griffin to attend white supremacist conference; BNP’s German allies launch anti-Israel tirade

He'll be there in the guise of a reformer no doubt.
LottiFurmann is offline


Old 01-22-2010, 02:55 PM   #4
Beerinkol

Join Date
Dec 2006
Posts
5,268
Senior Member
Default
Route? By which you mean exile, genocide? Well now I know how Hitler came to power. A few bombs by anarchists, some of whom happened to be Jewish was an excuse to kill 6 million people.

You are the one defending Morocco, which happened to actually cleanse Jews from its lands.
Beerinkol is offline


Old 01-22-2010, 04:21 PM   #5
Lillie_Steins

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
4,508
Senior Member
Default
How many Jews wept for Stalin or Hitler?

Definitely none for Hitler but millions of Jews did genuinely wept for Stalin.

Tens of thousands of Israeli Jews came out to mourn the very man supposedly responsible for ethnically cleansing them.

Like we discussed before the king didn't really do much. In any case why are defending a racist country which has lost all of its Jews in a matter of 20-30 years?
Lillie_Steins is offline


Old 01-22-2010, 05:56 PM   #6
Fegasderty

Join Date
Mar 2008
Posts
5,023
Senior Member
Default
You mean the king put in racist laws that prohibited Jews from leaving. Freedom to travel is a fundamental human right according to UN.

Anyways, we have discussed this before. Loosing an entire segment of a certain population in a matter of 20-30 years has mostly to do with what Jews felt about Morocco then with what king did and did not do. Racism is racism - there no need to defend it even though the racists just happen to be ones of your own.
Fegasderty is offline


Old 01-22-2010, 06:51 PM   #7
Paul Bunyan

Join Date
Jul 2007
Age
58
Posts
4,495
Senior Member
Default
I know all about racism. I was raised in the Jim Crow era in the South. There is not one single facet of persecution in Morocco that surpasses what blacks endurred at that time. The difference is that there was no place for them to go. If they had been told that they would be killed if they stayed and that the alternative was to get on a plane and head to Africa where citizenship, a job and housing would be awaiting them as well as eternal paradise, there wouldn't be but a few thousand African Americans living in the south today.

If the nature of this ethnic cleansing is what you say it is, there would not be even a single homesick Moroccan Jew in the world today. Why would anyone want to go back to a place with nothing but bad memories?
That's the key thing. The Jews in Morocco and elsewhere endured a lot over the centuries, but after 1948 they had options.

I do not mean to belittle the hardships they had to endure, but we also need to keep in mind the draw of living in the Holy Land. Israel had just come back into existence, and I have no doubt that was a factor as well. Personally, I would rather live in a Ma'abarah (resettlement camp) in Israel, than a palace in Casablanca and that has nothing to do with any fear of anti-Semitism.
Paul Bunyan is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:49 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity