Dhimmi Netherlands starts to segregate sexes - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**HedgeYourBets** · 01-03-2009, 09:01 AM

It will end wherever the Dutch want it to end.

**Peptobismol** · 02-27-2009, 06:15 PM

Privately owned? Are there laws that stipulate that they cant? I mean we have orthodox shuls with mahitzas you know...

**Beerinkol** · 02-27-2009, 08:55 PM

The city offices are publicly owned for sure...theatres not sure, but I am sure they are subsidized by the government. Shows that are expected to attrack many Muslims will have segregated places.

Interesting question about laws against public segregation, I donot know actually...

In the US anything gov funded cannot or should not be catered to any given minority (unless specifically defined extra: racial quotas, handicapped access etc, which is often a policy lightning rod anyway). In Israel as you know it's more of a mixed bag. How is it in Holland?

**Fegasderty** · 02-28-2009, 06:04 AM

In Holland integration is a big deal. As soon as an organisation says it wants to promote integration for newcomers, it can count on government subsidies. I am sure some or a lot is well spend. Some subsidies are completely ridiculous however. P.e. there is a Dutch Muslim forum, which gets fully subsidized with tax payer money. The forum is full with antisemitism and hatred towards kufar. I send a government organisation a weekly update, hoping they will stop subsidizing this, no results yet.

This a how the Rotterdam theatre looked yesterday:

Hi Rob,
Your post says the attachment is pending approval. Is there somewhere else that I can view that picture?
Thanks

**Slonopotam845** · 02-28-2009, 02:22 PM

Why is there such an emphasis on segretation? Why is there such an emphasis placed on women covering up every inch of themselves save their eyes?

Is it because they are expected to take on the responsibility for men's, erm..wishful thinking?

The reason I ask is that it reminds me a little of when Peter Sutcliffe, the 'Yorkshire Ripper', was hammering women over the head here in the UK.

I forget what his exact tally was when the police began considering a safety curfew.....on women!

Why? It was pretty much established that the Ripper was a man. So why not a curfew on men?

If men can't control themselves at the sight of a female face, they need to take cold showers, or whatever else it might be that cools their ardour. Why should women have to assume responsibility?

I'll dismantle my portable soapbox now

**softy54534** · 02-28-2009, 10:03 PM

This is where multiculturalism fails. And when it is gone... what will replace it I wonder.

01-03-2009, 09:01 AM	#1
HedgeYourBets Join Date Aug 2008 Posts 4,655 Senior Member	It will end wherever the Dutch want it to end. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

02-27-2009, 06:15 PM	#2
Peptobismol Join Date Oct 2005 Age 58 Posts 4,386 Senior Member	Dhimmi Netherlands starts to segregate sexes Privately owned? Are there laws that stipulate that they cant? I mean we have orthodox shuls with mahitzas you know... Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

02-27-2009, 08:55 PM	#3
Beerinkol Join Date Dec 2006 Posts 5,268 Senior Member	The city offices are publicly owned for sure...theatres not sure, but I am sure they are subsidized by the government. Shows that are expected to attrack many Muslims will have segregated places. Interesting question about laws against public segregation, I donot know actually... In the US anything gov funded cannot or should not be catered to any given minority (unless specifically defined extra: racial quotas, handicapped access etc, which is often a policy lightning rod anyway). In Israel as you know it's more of a mixed bag. How is it in Holland? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

02-28-2009, 06:04 AM	#4
Fegasderty Join Date Mar 2008 Posts 5,023 Senior Member	In Holland integration is a big deal. As soon as an organisation says it wants to promote integration for newcomers, it can count on government subsidies. I am sure some or a lot is well spend. Some subsidies are completely ridiculous however. P.e. there is a Dutch Muslim forum, which gets fully subsidized with tax payer money. The forum is full with antisemitism and hatred towards kufar. I send a government organisation a weekly update, hoping they will stop subsidizing this, no results yet. This a how the Rotterdam theatre looked yesterday: Hi Rob, Your post says the attachment is pending approval. Is there somewhere else that I can view that picture? Thanks Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

02-28-2009, 02:22 PM	#5
Slonopotam845 Join Date Jan 2006 Posts 5,251 Senior Member	Why is there such an emphasis on segretation? Why is there such an emphasis placed on women covering up every inch of themselves save their eyes? Is it because they are expected to take on the responsibility for men's, erm..wishful thinking? The reason I ask is that it reminds me a little of when Peter Sutcliffe, the 'Yorkshire Ripper', was hammering women over the head here in the UK. I forget what his exact tally was when the police began considering a safety curfew.....on women! Why? It was pretty much established that the Ripper was a man. So why not a curfew on men? If men can't control themselves at the sight of a female face, they need to take cold showers, or whatever else it might be that cools their ardour. Why should women have to assume responsibility? I'll dismantle my portable soapbox now Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

02-28-2009, 10:03 PM	#6
softy54534 Join Date Apr 2007 Posts 5,457 Senior Member	This is where multiculturalism fails. And when it is gone... what will replace it I wonder. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)