LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 09-02-2006, 09:56 AM   #1
sherrferris

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
605
Senior Member
Default Can 200 Police Chiefs be Wrong?
Yes, they can, and often are. Cops inherently believe in the idea that anyone breaking the law should be arrested and punished. Black and white. Their thinking is the same color as their cars.
sherrferris is offline


Old 09-02-2006, 02:36 PM   #2
amelveEnromma

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
448
Senior Member
Default
NYE said what needs to be said in this thread.
amelveEnromma is offline


Old 09-02-2006, 08:07 PM   #3
DuePew

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
634
Senior Member
Default
that green thing is the ugliest thing I have ever seen.
DuePew is offline


Old 09-02-2006, 10:46 PM   #4
priordine

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
346
Senior Member
Default
I heard somewhere that German police do not chase speeders -- they just photograph the license plate and mail out a (very expensive) ticket.
priordine is offline


Old 09-03-2006, 06:09 PM   #5
Dpkefsuf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
430
Senior Member
Default
..............and without shame.
Dpkefsuf is offline


Old 09-04-2006, 07:58 AM   #6
RaicickKida

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
388
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by BlackCat


Wonder how german police thinks Small I'd say.
RaicickKida is offline


Old 09-05-2006, 08:58 PM   #7
texbrease

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
465
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Flubber


Why slam the goverment so soon? Obviously there must be varied opionions on these things or the previous government's wouldn't have set up a single centre as a trial. Do you really believe the government hasn't already made their decision on this? It's not like the issue has snuck up on them.

Steve knows what he is going to do he just won't share with the rest of us.
texbrease is offline


Old 09-05-2006, 10:42 PM   #8
Meowmeowz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
475
Senior Member
Default
I suspect the same thing which is why he won't announce the decision until the last moment.

More of the media control Steve is big on.
Meowmeowz is offline


Old 09-06-2006, 09:57 PM   #9
VotsUtegems

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
544
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by joncha
This is why even the most conservative politicians in the city support the project. But apparently not the police chief.
VotsUtegems is offline


Old 09-06-2006, 10:28 PM   #10
Nafheense

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
517
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by joncha
Wrong. Vancouver's chief of police supports the plan. He's not one of the vaunted 200. Very interesting.

How do his fellow chiefs explain that?!
Nafheense is offline


Old 09-06-2006, 11:08 PM   #11
Plulpangepler

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
366
Senior Member
Default
Maybe NYE will have that article....
Plulpangepler is offline


Old 09-06-2006, 11:12 PM   #12
Sx1qBli0

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
344
Senior Member
Default
Ahh, that would explain the omission.

I thought it was somewhat deceitful to mention the 200 when the local 1 was contrary.

Police associations will never support measures and laws that would reduce their numbers. A union like any other.
Sx1qBli0 is offline


Old 09-07-2006, 12:02 AM   #13
flnastyax

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
454
Senior Member
Default
The Supreme Court will decide.

The future of a unique, supervised drug-injection site in Vancouver will be decided in the Supreme Court of Canada.

The Court said Thursday that it decide whether the federal government has authority to shut down the Downtown Eastside clinic - the first such clinic in North America to allow addicts to inject themselves with prohibited drugs under a nurse's supervision.

The case has turned into an important jurisdictional struggle between the province and federal governments.

In January, the B.C. Court of Appeal decided 2-1 that the province has jurisdiction over Insite for Community Safety since it provides addicts with health care, which is within provincial jurisdiction.

The court found that it was not necessary to rule on the facility's constitutional right to exist since it is a provincial responsibility. Its ruling upheld a 2008 trial decision by B.C. Supreme Court Justice Ian Pitfield, who found that the facility reduces the risk of death and disease for addicts, and the application of federal laws violated its clients' Charter rights to life, liberty and security of the person.

However, federal lawyers maintain that, while addicts need help, providing a safe injection site is the wrong way to go about doing it.

“Our national anti-drug strategy focuses on prevention and access to treatment for those with drug dependencies,'' federal Justice Minister Rob Nicholson said after the B.C. Court of Appeal ruling last January.

His statement prompted B.C. Health Minister Kevin Falcon to express disappointment with the federal government's opposition to a program that has had solid support in the medical community and in medical journals.

The $3-million Insite facility was opened in 2003 after it was specifically exempted from federal drug laws. Health Canada initially granted a three-year exemption under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act to establish it as a scientific research project. The federal Conservative government objected to it in recent years, however, the province continued allowing the facility to operate.

In 2008, the Portland Hotel Society and the Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users launched a constitutional challenge of the federal government's power to close the facility, arguing the site saves lives and money.

Clinic supporters maintain that it is a cost effective way of preventing overdose deaths, limiting the spread of disease and moving more people into addiction treatment programs. Many of its participants are homeless, have serious mental health issues or disabling illnesses. Besides the drug injection service, it offers nursing care, nutritious meals and art therapy.

The appeal will be heard next fall at the earliest.


http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...rticle1616194/


Btw, why don't Conservatives use the "police can't be wrong" argument with regard to the gun registry? Our police support it but Conservatives don't.
flnastyax is offline


Old 06-24-2010, 10:00 PM   #14
Teareerah

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
440
Senior Member
Default
4 years later...
Teareerah is offline


Old 06-24-2010, 10:16 PM   #15
SawbasyWrab

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
441
Senior Member
Default
Necromancy is bad.
Reduce, reuse, recycle. I'm a team player.


Seriously though, is there a more appropriate thread for the item I posted than the thread already in existence?
SawbasyWrab is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:38 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity