[wrefrinny]

Again, yet another prediction I made has come true. I said, they'd be trying to teach kindergartners about homosexuality, and sure enough it came about.

Blowback is a ***** innit.

[mincarlie.frymyer]

Any responsible conservative christian ought to have taught their kids about the evils of homosexuality by the time they get to grade school anyway, so I don't see why they're up in arms about pro-gay indoctrination.

Indeed. Plus the Catholic schools have a constitutional right to be bigoted and molest their pupils, so they can just choose to ignore the new directives.

Public schools are secular...deal with it, *****es.

[aaafluochugh]

He posted pictures of man-ass, you might want to take him off ignore to evaluate the quality of the man-ass.

[peveballery]

"This is part of a militant homosexual agenda to normalize homosexuality in everyone's mind and thereby promote homosexuality. If we teach our children these things ... guess what? That's what they'll practice."
Let's put aside for a second just how retarded that statement is, and ask "does the author know what militant means"?


In today's world, I find his use of the term far too loose.

[htDgExh8]

Let's put aside for a second just how retarded that statement is, and ask "does the author know what militant means"?

Militant gays

[EbrsaRynleot]

So you've finally put him on Ignore! I wonder if I should put him back on Ignore.

Yes, don't ever stop ignoring Ben.

[leoto5Fm]

Can a moderator please get Ben to stop posting in this thread? At this point it constitutes spam since no one is reading his posts and he's probably intentionally trying to kill the thread because he doesn't like it. He's sad like that.

Thanks.

[Reocourgigiot]

I must've "forgot to mention" Catholic schools when I specifically mentioned Catholic schools. My bad.

****, stop quoting him. The stupidity hurts.

Indeed. Plus the Catholic schools have a constitutional right to be bigoted and molest their pupils, so they can just choose to ignore the new directives.

Public schools are secular...deal with it, *****es.

[MyOwnStyle]

Indeed. Plus the Catholic schools have a constitutional right to be bigoted and molest their pupils, so they can just choose to ignore the new directives. Actually, that's not the case. McGimpy's bill was going to force them to teach about homosexuality. This is a violation of their freedom of religion.

[replicamuse]

The actual PDF was pulled from the site so I don't have it.

Here's a summary I've found:

Here’s what children were to learn under a revamped sex education curriculum that the Premier has now put on hold after an outcry by religious groups and some parents.



Grade 1 — Body parts, including correct terminology for genitalia

Grade 2 — Stages of human development

Grade 3 — Healthy relationships, differences and how they make humans unique (discussion could include sexual orientation, physical abilities, cultural values)

Grade 4 — Puberty and physical/social impact (currently taught in Gr. 5)

Grade 5 — Reproductive system, menstruation, spermatogenesis, emotional stresses of puberty

Grade 6 — Emotional, social and physical changes of adolescence (discussion could include wet dreams, erections, vaginal lubrication — “normal things that happen as a result of physical changes” — and masturbation, “something that many people will do and find pleasurable”)

Grade 7 — Delaying sexual activity, sexually transmitted infections (STI), pregnancy and STI prevention (possible discussion of vaginal/anal/oral sex as ways of transmitting infections)

Grade 8 – Making decisions about sexual activity; sexual health/abstinence/safe sex; gender identity (male/female/transgendered/transsexual)

[apodildNoli]

Canada is way behind the times. Here in the US (government funded)...


Part 1 includes discussion of "spit versus swallowing" during oral sex. There's also the explanation to students as young as 12 about "fisting."

Tape 2 includes a promotion for homosexuality. "Homosexuality – they said don't knock it until you've tried it," said an instructor. "Just like you haven't tried a vegetable, how do you know you don't like it?"
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=118484

Please excuse the source, I figured maximum bias was a plus on this one.

[Gakeincidoniac]

Fistgate.

[AntonayPina]

I, for one, think it is awesome that they chose to protest in "Queen's Park." I stopped reading right there.

[Nptxsews]

And responsible Christians don't want their kids sent to schools that try to undo everything they've taught them, especially not CATHOLIC schools, which Asher somehow forgets to mention.

Why is it responsible for Christians to teach children homosexuality is evil?

[feroiodpiop]

When I was 10 years old my parents 'subtly' planted a book (intended for adults) about sexuality in my wardrobe, between two t-shirts. I devored it. The result was that in 4th grade I was already arguing with the grade school bullies about not calling others gay, because it's not wrong to be gay anyway.

Sex-ed

[payloansday]

In my opinion, the proposed curriculum was a bit extreme.
Grade 6 is what, 12 year olds? First, you can easily compress the course to be taught in grades 6-8 (does it really take a whole year to teach boys and girls to say "penis"?) This way you push masturbation to grade 7, when there's less probability that kids'll go "master bashon? Sounds nifty. I guess I'll go try that later tonight" which is probably what parents fear, and more probability for "oh, so that's what I'm doing, I guess I'm not a freak, then" or "ha-ha, she's talking about jacking off".
Second, any discussion of abnormal sexual behavior could be delegated to the parents. You mention that there are people who engage is other sexual practices than man-on-woman sex and tell them to go home and write an essay with their parents listing the practices they can think of and their opinion of them. This way the parents stay in control, and the teacher can evaluate the level of bigotry parents of their pupils possess and try to correct most extreme cases.

[Arbinknit]

Why is it responsible for Christians to teach children homosexuality is evil? This is a good question.

Christianity teaches that sex is reserved for a man and a woman in marriage. Anything outside of this is detrimental to the health and wellbeing (both spritually, and physically) of the participants. It's no different then teaching children about other destructive habits and how to engage in them, while at the same time dismissing the negatives.

[bestonlinepharmasy2]

It's not "dismissing negatives", it's "ignoring BS".

[Nekas48]

It's not "dismissing negatives", it's "ignoring BS". So why not teach them to shoot heroin and tell them that it's good for their health? In the long run it would have a more positive effect.

[HomePageOEMfreeSOFTWARE]

There are many pathologies almost exclusively associated with sodomy.