[gimffnfabaykal]

Originally posted by JohnT
The results have the potential to be really funny. Good one, Ozzy!

8.5/10 What's really sad is that despite the fact that this was the second post of the thread, your prediction came true

[BenBoobmers]

Originally posted by JohnT
* JohnT sits back happily, munching popcorn.

[DaleJrGirl]

abortion is still legal. drinking is still legal. euthanasia (certain rules apply) is still legal.

[PymnImmen]

cool, ain't it ?

[Toivaluadiora]

That's right. Catholics aren't Christian.

[Berta]

Christian Reconstructionism

[acceraStoof]

Originally posted by snoopy369
And do you really think a socialist (or anything significantly further left than us) government would regulate [abortions] LESS?

Strangely enough, Canada doesn't have any laws dealing with abortion on the books. They were all struck down in the 80s and not replaced.

[rxnixoncom]

Why the future tense in the question?

[baxodrom]

Yay for military dictatorship!

[voksveta]

Originally posted by Dauphin
I wonder if George will die the same way as Richard. What, Jeb murders him on his way back from Jerusalem?

[BGThomasis]

Originally posted by Frankychan
What? He's a Christian Fundy whose trying to not seem so fundy. I'm not advocating the military oust his ass. I'd rather see him impeached cause GWB is screwing over our country and is making more flipflops on the Iraq war than EVER. It reminds me on his campaign for 2004 presidency where he was accusing KERRY of flipflopping. Sounds like Bush2 is being verrrry hypocritical if you ask me.

He's changing the rhetoric of even the 'insurgents' to 'fundementalist extremist' cause the opinion of the war in Iraq is changing. He's trying to get us to support the war now when it was a sham in the friggin first place! Any sane individual would acknowledge that he's changed his priorities and his mission statement about Iraq at LEAST 3 times.

Worse yet, he's screwing over our military by stretching them too thin. Hey, I support our troops. But I sure as heck don't support the war. A crappily executed war that we never should have gotten into and a hypocritical, poor-excuse for a President is NOT the same as someone looking to wash away our 200+ year democracy and replace it with a dictatorship.

Whatever happened to the nuance that liberals were so proud of? Everyone attacks Bush for being some simple-minded fool who equates all Muslims with terrorists and thus evil. But yet liberals the world over simple-mindedly equate a person whose policies you dislike with a facist bent on enslaving mankind.

Umm...

It is posisble, ya know, to oppose Bush and not think he is going to destroy demcracy and install himself as dictator for life.

[Barryrich]

Originally posted by Ogie Oglethorpe
Like the inevitable communist revolution perhaps? The inevitiablity of socialism is propaganda, kinda like a football team saying "We will win!" before the game.

[Woziwfaq]

Originally posted by JohnT
The results have the potential to be really funny. Good one, Ozzy!

8.5/10 Thanks

[ManHolDenPoker]

Patroklos - yes Bush is. As in stretching them too thin. Want all the statements from Shinseki, you know the general who had the guts to publically predict everything that has happened in Iraq post-end of hostilities? You know, Bush's statement about Iraq over a year ago. More Americans have died in combat since that statement.

We cannot secure the borders with Syria, or Iran. We cannot garrison many of the cities we conduct military ops in, letting the militants back in as soon as the combat ops are over. We are pulling troops from deployments all of the world, to serve in Iraq, and recruitment is falling short of expectations, and we are having to refuse military personnel scheduled retirements and leaving after terms of enlistment due to these personnel shortages. Oh, and we are deploying National Guard troops with inadequate training and lead in time.

The Secretary of Defense is driven to state "As you know, you go to war with the Army you have. They’re not the Army you might want or wish to have at a later time." Not stretched thin my a**.

But Patroklos is right. We should have an income tax surcharge for the troops, to pay for the equipment they should have, to give them realistic good salaries in combat zones, and to pay decent and realistic compensation to the widow(er)s and children who have lost parents. That would be real sacrifice for our troops, but then Bush would have to abandon his dream of so crippling the federal governmet via future deficits that he can "...starve the beast" (neocon mantra). You starve the beast, you starve the military. Just look at the Soviet Union/Russia. Fools.

[JOR4qxYH]

[Roxanjbra]

you think partial term abortion is okay

[rXpX]

Originally posted by Kuciwalker


What's really sad is that despite the fact that this was the second post of the thread, your prediction came true Indeed.

[metrocartockasur]

[Percocetti]

>

[dHXaE2h9]

who's that lion heart