LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 12-05-2008, 04:36 AM   #21
unapelosina

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
477
Senior Member
Default
Obviously that "authority" is just a kool-aid-drinking true believer, or bribed, or both. It's the only explanation that makes sense.
unapelosina is offline


Old 12-05-2008, 04:41 AM   #22
Charryith

Join Date
Oct 2005
Location
Italy
Posts
587
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Boris Godunov


Obama says he wants to fix this NCAA so there are playoffs. Better hope he stays. I prefer dispute.
Charryith is offline


Old 12-05-2008, 04:45 AM   #23
WGfg4CCZ

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
425
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by TCO
Darius: Biden would succeed. It wojuld be similar to a death or incapacitation or resignation. Provided Obama already serving. Obama would not be able to stop the enforcement of sucvh a ruling. The popular opinion would not sustain him and the military would have more allegiance to the Constitution than the man. Obama would have to resign or be impeached and voted from office. There's no other mechanism for removing a sitting president.

We'd probably be looking at a massive Constitutional crisis, for sure.
WGfg4CCZ is offline


Old 12-05-2008, 04:58 AM   #24
movlabc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
431
Senior Member
Default
He would resign, be impeached or possibly be declared non-seving by th USSC. It would be no problem to get him out of there.
movlabc is offline


Old 12-05-2008, 05:00 AM   #25
radicalvolume

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
453
Senior Member
Default
military officers make an oath to the Constitution, not to the President. If USSC said he was ineligbile, he would have his bags packed and be escorted out the door. Also, public opinion (including Democrat congresscritters) would be against him. He would have no support.
radicalvolume is offline


Old 12-05-2008, 05:11 AM   #26
Jerwittdergut

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
436
Senior Member
Default
LOL, this was pretty entertaining:
Jerwittdergut is offline


Old 12-05-2008, 05:20 AM   #27
enentique

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
440
Senior Member
Default
Actually I don't think that parents can irrevocably renounce American citizenship for their children. I'm fairly certain that a child born to US citizens outside the US, or a child born outside the US to parents of mixed nationality, one being American, the other not, may choose his nationality at 21 years of age. For that matter, I'm not even sure if it's possible to "naturalize" a child. AFAIK in the US the process only applies to adults. A foreign child adopted by an American automatically becomes naturalized upon entering the country and completing the adoption process. I believe that children born to alien parents who naturalize before the children reach majority also become citizens or have the right to choose at age 21.

Did Obama's mother renounce her citizenship?
enentique is offline


Old 12-05-2008, 05:35 AM   #28
P3bWjm1j

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
426
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by TCO
military officers make an oath to the Constitution, not to the President. If USSC said he was ineligbile, he would have his bags packed and be escorted out the door. Also, public opinion (including Democrat congresscritters) would be against him. He would have no support. Yet your positing what amounts to an unconstitutional military coup...

The SCOTUS has no power to enforce anything it decides, of course.

There's no guarantee public opinion would turn against him, either, depending on how it was handled. If he plead ignorance, saying he honestly had no idea this was the case and he'd been led to believe he was born in the U.S. yada yada yada, then there might be enough support to sustain him. He's got ~67% approval ratings right now.
P3bWjm1j is offline


Old 12-05-2008, 05:38 AM   #29
9uWzBx4l

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
394
Senior Member
Default
His birthname was Barack. He went by Barry for much of his childhood.
9uWzBx4l is offline


Old 12-05-2008, 05:41 AM   #30
ptolerezort

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
432
Senior Member
Default
About the same time liberals too to get over Bush's theft.

Oh, and Clinton's blowjob.

And Kennedy's Missile Crisis.

And FDR's New Deal.

In other words, they'll never get over it.
ptolerezort is offline


Old 12-05-2008, 05:47 AM   #31
doksSirmAdods

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
638
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Docfeelgood
How do you know it is not the other way around? You're the one who posted his birth certificate. Figure it out.

doksSirmAdods is offline


Old 12-05-2008, 05:49 AM   #32
Peter Hill

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
558
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Boris Godunov


You're the one who posted his birth certificate. Figure it out.



I am trying to figure it out.

like kool-aid?
Peter Hill is offline


Old 12-05-2008, 05:53 AM   #33
seosoftseo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
597
Senior Member
Default
BTW, I've read through most of his petition and it does actually have some strong legal arguments on standing, particularly given that this issue is novel. This one precedential snippet might tip the scales in favor of at least hearing the case:

More recently, in
Akins, this Court rendered a decision maintaining
that individual voters’ inability to obtain alleged
public information met the injury in fact
requirement,
as it helped to ensure that the Court
will adjudicate “a concrete, living contest between
adversaries.” 524 U.S. at 21. http://www.obamacrimes.com/attachmen...2010_30_08.pdf
seosoftseo is offline


Old 12-05-2008, 05:55 AM   #34
Orefsmisits

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
442
Senior Member
Default
Even if the plaintiffs have standing to bring suit, that doesn't remotely require SCOTUS to hear it. They frequently decide not to hear cases that are, to them, obviously without merit, as this one is.
Orefsmisits is offline


Old 12-05-2008, 05:59 AM   #35
baritkello

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
437
Senior Member
Default
The Illuminati youtube was not convincing.
baritkello is offline


Old 12-05-2008, 06:03 AM   #36
AlexClips

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
420
Senior Member
Default
If that were the case, they'd have the accompanying adoption records with the certificate.

Of course, why Obama would need to be adopted by his own natural birth parents is beyond me.
AlexClips is offline


Old 12-05-2008, 06:07 AM   #37
feroiodpiop

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
479
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by TCO
The Illuminati youtube was not convincing. Like I said, it was only for comedic value.
feroiodpiop is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:13 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity