[videolkif]

Don't touch history forum , as the few (semi)active history threads will quickly be totally buried in the mud of OT.

[viagra-kaufen]

Originally posted by JulianD
Don't touch history forum , as the few (semi)active history threads will quickly be totally buried in the mud of OT. So what? are you worried fewer people will see them because they get buried? Certainly fewer people see them by far when they get posted here. In any case you can always necro the the buried thread if you're interested in responding to it.

[tsamprasxx]

Kill it!

[usatramadolusa]

Originally posted by Kidicious
Kill it!

[mvjvz]

Originally posted by Geronimo


So what? are you worried fewer people will see them because they get buried? Certainly fewer people see them by far when they get posted here. In any case you can always necro the the buried thread if you're interested in responding to it. So that.

No, i'm not worried. Just so that you know.

[xochex]

Don't kill it, it took us soo long to get it.

If you cancel it, I'll leave poly and everyone knows that poly is dead without me.

[Iphone]

Originally posted by JulianD


No one will un-bury them.
QFT

[JewJoleSole]

Originally posted by JulianD
Don't touch history forum , as the few (semi)active history threads will quickly be totally buried in the mud of OT. The History SubForum is dead. Its thread should be buried, or else resurrected in the glorious light of the OT

[Konidurase]

The way the question was asked shows the asker's personal bias.

[derisgun]

Originally posted by Heraclitus
Don't kill it, it took us soo long to get it.

If you cancel it, I'll leave poly and everyone knows that poly is dead without me. Not until you finish HOTW12

[Herimoisige]

Originally posted by OzzyKP


Not until you finish HOTW12
Oh, don't worry I still have the Anon account.

[cokLoolioli]

Yeah, spaming and boring posts are runing poly.


Oh, the delicius irony.

[soitlyobserty]

Originally posted by Locutus
Uhmm, I have no bias here. I was for years one of the biggest supporters of creating a History forum and actively campaigned for it but by the time we finally got it I had a much busier life and have had very little time to contribute (I still lurk though). I'm saddened to see that I'm clearly not the only one, so while I have an emotional desire to keep the forum I see increasingly less rational arguments for it -- I could live with either decision, really (for full disclosure, I voted to keep it though). Well in any case your question does not match the critera for a good neutral survey question.

[zlopikanikanzax]

Originally posted by Heraclitus
Don't kill it, it took us soo long to get it.

If you cancel it, I'll leave poly and everyone knows that poly is dead without me. This is why the admins shouldn't have fooked around with the OT to begin with. Having lost the Civ crowd to CFC they just had to exterminate the OT to finish the job. People like Heraclitus here who would have been here dealing with history as part of the OT forever now will walk when you put it back which you really need to do to help the OT.

Silly boogers just quit screwing everything up.

Oh! ...and rename the OT to Off Topic/Stories and Diplomacy or whatever it was before the division that wiped out the S&D crowd and weakened the OT that way. Then, close that mistake too. That way who knows? Maybe somebody will start a story someday.

...and GET A HAIRCUT!!! CLEAN UP YOUR ROOM and FIND a G I R L! There's enough pics around here to provide an example of what to look for.

[UlceskLialels]

Please leave this forum. These threads need to stay out of the OTF, which is so busy I get disoriented. Plus this would eliminate the practicality of the awesome joke of replying "---> History Forum" whenever somebody posts a duplicate thread.

Also, I hate the people who post here so the more time they spend away from the OTF the better.

[KernJetenue]

Originally posted by Asher
Please leave this forum. These threads need to stay out of the OTF, which is so busy I get disoriented. Plus this would eliminate the practicality of the awesome joke of replying "---> History Forum" whenever somebody posts a duplicate thread.

Also, I hate the people who post here so the more time they spend away from the OTF the better. I want to say something homophobic to piss you off but I'll save it for another day.

[Trikaduliana]

Originally posted by Wiglaf


I want to say something homophobic to piss you off but I'll save it for another day. You're so cute, I doubt there's anything you could say to piss me off.

[Cnbaapuy]

Originally posted by DaShi
Leave it here. Laz is the best mod ever and the others should have this forum to learn from his example. Maybe we should move OT into here.

End the apartheid. Reunite the forums.

[SergZHy67]

I think we should keep the separate history forum, because:
1) when I started posting on 'Poly again, it was because of the history forum.
2) world history forum is the only section on CFC that I have posted to.
3) here history threads don't get buried.
4) separate history forum inspires people to post some threads that would otherwise end up unposted.
5) we waited quite a long time for this.
6) who knows what future might hold.

[cucceevevaind]

I used to post in the history threads but rarely come here to post. The benefit of having the threads all in the same place is more than lost by having far less traffic to keep a thread alive. As Geronimo points out, a thread not being posted in may as well be buried on a later page.

Any idea how long this decision may take?