LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 04-29-2008, 08:55 PM   #1
Loxaeed

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
481
Senior Member
Default Ontario to become "have not" province in 2 years, Western provs to subsidize the east
FREE Ontario!
Loxaeed is offline


Old 04-29-2008, 09:10 PM   #2
Shemker394

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
416
Senior Member
Default
What is surprising is PEI, NB, Man, NE, Qc, NFL and Sask all received money from the perequation(equalization?). Per capita Manitoba received more than Quebec in perequation.

There is two provinces which do not beneficiary from perequation (equalization?): BC and Ab. Ontario was in the neutral bracket.

Where I can see an argument in favor of equalization is that the increasing demand for energy which lead to an higher dollars, are badly affecting eastern can and center can manufacturing industry.
Shemker394 is offline


Old 04-29-2008, 09:16 PM   #3
texprofi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
556
Senior Member
Default
Why is this surprising?

Recently AB and ON were the only "have" provinces.

When Saskatchewan is a "have" province and your province isn't, something is majorly ****ed up.
texprofi is offline


Old 04-29-2008, 09:18 PM   #4
BiseCreesia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
467
Senior Member
Default
Well, you can always take pride still that Canada is avoiding the ramifications of a U.S. recession.
Wait, that doesn't sound right.
BiseCreesia is offline


Old 04-29-2008, 09:27 PM   #5
bloriMal

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
416
Senior Member
Default
We have to start somewhere. You think we attained such heights in one day? NO! It takes a lot of not work.
bloriMal is offline


Old 04-29-2008, 09:32 PM   #6
Ruiceara

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
492
Senior Member
Default
Yay, BC is over the top again. Great!

I thought you said we were destined to stay on the other side.
Ruiceara is offline


Old 04-29-2008, 09:35 PM   #7
bashansasasasa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
702
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Ninot
I love it. Your 2 OT posts for the day are anti-Ontario and anti-Quebec This one is actually a bit of both.
bashansasasasa is offline


Old 04-29-2008, 09:36 PM   #8
Bobobsdo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
Yay, BC is over the top again. Great!

I thought you said we were destined to stay on the other side. You think a lot of things that don't exist in reality. This is just another example.
Bobobsdo is offline


Old 04-29-2008, 10:22 PM   #9
VINPELA

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
425
Senior Member
Default
His problem is one or two years hence.
VINPELA is offline


Old 04-29-2008, 10:37 PM   #10
Cucoulkrory

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
557
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Asher
You don't see a trend in Ontario's suckfest? Trend? Not so much as a cycle.

Ontario has had low points before (again as your article points out) and will again. Also, as your article points out, Ontario isn't sucking so much as some other provinces are doing extremely well at the moment.

AB is doing very well at the moment but they have a history of being a bust/boom economy. I think it is pretty sad a province that has the wealth AB has had over the years yet didn't do jack **** to diversify the economy. Hopefully they learn this time and Ontario doesn't have to support them through their next downturn.
Cucoulkrory is offline


Old 04-29-2008, 10:47 PM   #11
retTreftowhexm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
386
Senior Member
Default
I hope so but I guess the real test will come when the energy industry takes a downturn.

I do however point out that you are in TO and not AB.
retTreftowhexm is offline


Old 04-29-2008, 10:51 PM   #12
rsdefwgxvcfdts

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
539
Senior Member
Default
I'm not doubting their current strength or your claim they have now diversified. Simply pointing out that was not their historical position.

I too think high energy prices are here to stay but I saw recently the absolute *****ing and moaning from the energy companies in AB re the debate on royalties. I can only imagine what effect certain "environmental" taxes/levies/whatevers might do to them.

I guess the real issue of the thread would be "Is Ontario diversified enough?". I think it is. While manufacturing and heavy industry are taking a serious hit at the moment there are many more facets to the provincial economy which can keep things going. For example, the recent downturn in the auto industry would have crippled the province 30 years ago.
rsdefwgxvcfdts is offline


Old 04-29-2008, 10:59 PM   #13
drgshmcm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
403
Senior Member
Default
In the big cities that is called a "drive by shooting".
drgshmcm is offline


Old 04-29-2008, 11:05 PM   #14
actrisski

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
605
Senior Member
Default
The really cool news about the commodities boom, from my perspective, is that we now have full employment for all geologists and wages are skyrocketing. Hell, when I graduated in 2001 it was hard to find a job and many friends I went to school with settled for just $40k but now the average salary for a geologist with zero to two years experience has shot up to $82k per year.

We're all getting big raises.

The sciences and engineering is where the money is!
actrisski is offline


Old 04-29-2008, 11:15 PM   #15
SHUSIATULSE

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
376
Senior Member
Default
Word
SHUSIATULSE is offline


Old 04-30-2008, 07:00 AM   #16
usatramadolusa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
438
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Asher


Did someone say something? Where are you?? You've been away too long. Saskatchewan is booming.
usatramadolusa is offline


Old 04-30-2008, 07:10 AM   #17
tinetttstation

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
470
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by notyoueither
You've been away too long. Saskatchewan is booming. I know all about it, but it's not much of a troll, is it...
tinetttstation is offline


Old 04-30-2008, 07:35 AM   #18
Preegovesem

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
457
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by notyoueither

I'm not sure what you meant by Ontario 'was in the neutral bracket,' or the rest of that sentence. Ontario has been the engine on equalization since the programm's inception. Alberta grew (and got lucky) and has pitched in more and more. BC until very recently had slumped and was receiving. Very recently. I said neutral bracket because of the way that the graph I had was made. But I should have said, that they are very near the means of the fiscal capacity of the CDN provinces.

Only three provinces — Alberta, B.C. and Ontario — are considered wealthy enough not to require equalization. But all, except for Ontario, have received it in the past. (Quoted from CBC)
Preegovesem is offline


Old 04-30-2008, 08:18 AM   #19
EmpokemyMok

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
503
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by CrONoS


That's not the same thing I spoke about, I spoke about the competitiveness of an industry. If your economy is dependent of your exportation, and there is a rise in the value of the cdn dollars (because of a growing in the demand of cnd oil); it would be much more difficult to compete in the world market for the country, that's why it penalize, in a way, some province, more than others. When the cdn dollars is rising, the competitiveness of Canadian industry are lowering.

Because of this fact, I understand why we include 50% of the income from natural resource to be included in the equalization payment. What parts of the economies of Western Canada are not dependant on exports?

Our industries pay the same prices for energy. We have the same dollar.
EmpokemyMok is offline


Old 05-07-2008, 04:15 AM   #20
pKgGpUlF

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
547
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by notyoueither


What parts of the economies of Western Canada are not dependant on exports? Competitiveness in international trade are mainly the combination of two things; the cost of producing a unit and the cost of your dollars.

When the demand for oil grow up; the price of cdn grow up and industries(like manufactures) which doesn't have the same price structure than the oil industry are losing their competitiveness.
pKgGpUlF is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:44 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity