[dabibibff]

Ok: Satan put that there to test our faith.

How'd I do?

[sicheAscems]

Originally posted by TheStinger
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7339508.stm

seems like another nail in the coffin for the anti science superstitious fruitcakes Not to worry. Facts only affect people who care about the facts.

[Flerdourdyged]

Originally posted by Rufus T. Firefly
Ok: Satan put that there to test our faith. Creationists were put here to test my faith. [/Bill Hicks]

[Kimmitmelvirm]

If any of you had studied the ancient scrolls, you would know that snakes had legs in the Garden of Eden.

[SiM7W2zi]

Great, now I've got a Robert Palmer video and a ZZ Top song stuck in my head simultaneously.

[RlUbQU3R]

And shouldn't it be four legged, not two?

[Tusethede]

Thinking about it........ maybe this is the fossil of Satan himself!

[N95FzmMw]

Since they have a grand total of 1 fossil of a snake with legs, isn't it just as likely to be a mutation?

If it is, or isn't, who really gives a damn?

What purpose does studying a snake fossil serve? Besides Evilutionist propaganda, of course.

ACK!

[bensabath]

I have to admit that the thought of a snake with two legs does seem pretty evil to me.

[Druspills]

You have no idea what you're talking about.

[gugamotina]

Goddamnit Kuci, are you going to get to this guy first every ****ing time?

[layedgebiamma]

Originally posted by KrazyHorse
Goddamnit Kuci, are you going to get to this guy first every ****ing time?

[Frinzer]

Why do people laugh at creationists

A great serie of funny videos.
The first ones are just for laugh, but the quality improves in the later ones.
I spent a great evening watching them all.

[Patabeamn]

Originally posted by Whoha
the time you spent typing, he spent cutting and pasting. He uses words more efficiently. Proof that he's more intelligent.

[CorpoRasion]

What's the big deal? Haven't other examples been recorded?

http://paleopolis.rediris.es/cg/CG20.../index_uk.html

[BokerokyBan]

Originally posted by Perfection


I think it's rather stupid that these sorts of news events are touted as "another nail in the coffin". The coffin is hermetically sealed, and has been for many decades, it makes it look that this is a significant finding in evidence against creationism and that creationism still has some scientific merit, bot of which are completely false. If you ignore creationist they don't go away. therefore they should be challenged.

[JulieSmithdccd]

Please explain the title. I don't think we have any strict creationists on 'Poly, so who are you talking to?

And I'm with Perf. Creationism was never a scientific theory to begin with, and the people who still believe in it certainly do not do so out of respect for the scientific method.

[Ufkkrxcq]

Originally posted by Perfection
I'm not against challanging them, just the implication that some new data could significantly improve our empirical advantage over them. What makes you think creationists care what you "think" your "advantage" is at all?

It's the atheists who seem so eaten up with the debate. Think what you want. It's your problem.

[ReggieRed]

No, there's not.