General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
Originally posted by DinoDoc
Your post confuses me. My LOL was a gut reaction to yours and Wiggys post at 39 and 40. Namely for the reason that Ming stated and then that Wiggy seems to be thinking I'm making things up. Now your question about wether she had a valid ID in 2006 is unanswerable. Most likely, it would appear that she did not, but the article does not state either way, so I'm inclined to not assume anything. You may continue to do so if you wish. |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
You keep saying it's a strawman, yet you harp on the illegal immigrant issue enough that it gives me reason to believe it's more accurate than you claim.
But ok, I'll drop it it and simply say that I agree with Donegeal's department's policy. If the woman was unable to present ID that was reasonably valid-looking (obviously it wouldn't have actually been valid) to the cop who let her go in 2006, that was a screwup. We don't know for sure, but it seems likely. -Arrian |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
I remember that thread, which shouldn't be surprising since I actively participated in it.
I failed to ask for your position on immigration, which in retrospect is odd. Perhaps my impression of you being knee-jerk anti-immigrant developed after that thread. Of course, my first question in that thread remains valid despite your response, and is one possible reason that someone might get the wrong idea about you... -Arrian |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|