LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 12-20-2007, 03:52 AM   #1
cepAceryTem

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
517
Senior Member
Default Bush's EPA: Making the World Safe for Greenhouse Gases
How do they try to justify denying the waiver?
cepAceryTem is offline


Old 12-20-2007, 04:25 AM   #2
Goksiodiffeli

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
440
Senior Member
Default
CA = pwnd.
Goksiodiffeli is offline


Old 12-20-2007, 05:01 AM   #3
BarBoss

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
577
Senior Member
Default
Secret Service could take him.
BarBoss is offline


Old 12-20-2007, 05:55 AM   #4
muytreda

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
534
Senior Member
Default
This is basic federal pre-emption of state law. Happens all the time.

Really, there are other ways of achieving similar results. F.e., gasoline taxes.
muytreda is offline


Old 12-20-2007, 07:41 AM   #5
duexjepevef

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
422
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by DanS
This is basic federal pre-emption of state law. Happens all the time. Well, aside from the fact that under the EPA, it DOESN'T happen all the time. That's why there is a specific carve out procedure for California.
duexjepevef is offline


Old 12-20-2007, 07:45 AM   #6
entaifsfets

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
429
Senior Member
Default
http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediaselector/c...&nbram=1&asb=1

The EU is moving ahead with CO2 limits for cars.
entaifsfets is offline


Old 12-21-2007, 12:02 AM   #7
Stoniaanapy

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
352
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Well, aside from the fact that under the EPA, it DOESN'T happen all the time. That's why there is a specific carve out procedure for California. That's because of historical accident. I don't see the problem in harmonizing national environmental regulations, in general.
Stoniaanapy is offline


Old 12-25-2007, 12:03 AM   #8
BV6lwvXf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
460
Senior Member
Default
This refusal was a first. The EPA has never refused such a waiver request before. By Federal law California is the only state allowed to set separate automotive tail pipe emissions and other states have the option of either adopting the California standard or the looser Federal standard. Since 1963 the EPA has never blocked any such regulation by the state of California and legally speaking California has every right to regulate any emission which comes out of an automotive tailpipe. California's Republican governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has called the Bush administration's obstructionism "outrageous" and has directed the state's Attorney General to begin working on a legal case to challenge the EPA's ruling.
BV6lwvXf is offline


Old 12-25-2007, 12:18 AM   #9
provigil

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
493
Senior Member
Default
Are 48" pizzas now legal in California? Are the 48" pizza greenhouse gas laws still in effect out there? Inquiring minds.....
provigil is offline


Old 12-25-2007, 12:23 AM   #10
TheLucyLee

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
419
Senior Member
Default
No. Mobius, no.
Satan is intelligent enough to invent his own ways to torture mankind.
He doesn´t need any corporate executives to tell him how to do it
TheLucyLee is offline


Old 12-25-2007, 12:35 AM   #11
CHEAPPoem

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
564
Senior Member
Default
They are the 16 states which have already passed laws ordering the California green house gas limits be adopted. Those 17 states make up something like 40% of the US automotive market which is so large that automakers would effectively have to design all cars to meet California's emission requirements. Thus Bush's obstructionism.
CHEAPPoem is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:23 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity