LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 11-13-2007, 02:42 PM   #1
ZX3URrBH

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
381
Senior Member
Default Then and Now
As with the rest of the planning they did not take an extended occupation into consideration. Just march in, sweep away Saddam and company, and istall the eager Iraqi exile community into power.

That being said, I fail to see how even the initial invasion by itself could cost only 60 billion. Moving all the equipment over there, moving it all back (if we had left), ordinance expended, equipment replacement (things wear out, even in a campaign that short), and a thousand other normal things.

They really ****ed that up, but then again some people predicted 30+K casualties for the initial invasion to. People are stupid.
ZX3URrBH is offline


Old 11-13-2007, 03:51 PM   #2
ButKnillinoi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
495
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by SlowwHand
Except they didn't count on the reluctance of the population to take control of their own destiny. The population has taken control of its own destiny. They just didn't count on there being multiple, competing versions of that destiny, and multiple, armed populations, each willing to fight for its version.

Mind you, anyone with a 7th grade education, a library card, and an hour to kill reading up on the history of Iraq would have come to the conclusion that this would happen. But I guess nobody in the White House has a library card.
ButKnillinoi is offline


Old 11-13-2007, 03:56 PM   #3
Psymoussy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
458
Senior Member
Default
Another pointless poll catering to the liberals.
Yada, yada, redundant yada.
Psymoussy is offline


Old 11-13-2007, 04:15 PM   #4
Roferurse

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
362
Senior Member
Default
Spec, give it a rest. No, take your shots because I'm going to return fire. Pass this blame game onto the next lucky contestant.
Roferurse is offline


Old 11-13-2007, 04:51 PM   #5
Kdgjhytiy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
441
Senior Member
Default
Well, we are importing Mexicans to teach us how .
Kdgjhytiy is offline


Old 11-13-2007, 05:18 PM   #6
Snocioncilm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
445
Senior Member
Default
ummmm, where are you getting that our economy is tanking?
Snocioncilm is offline


Old 11-13-2007, 07:51 PM   #7
251EPyso

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
489
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by SlowwHand
Except they didn't count on the reluctance of the population to take control of their own destiny. A tad harsh to blame the Iraqi population IMO.
251EPyso is offline


Old 11-13-2007, 08:24 PM   #8
Stengapsept

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
651
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Cort Haus
A tad harsh to blame the Iraqi population IMO. All they have to do is to leave peacefully with their neighbors down the street rather than murdering them. This isn't asking a whole lot.
Stengapsept is offline


Old 11-13-2007, 09:30 PM   #9
cakaeroryrere

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
413
Senior Member
Default
really $20,000 to a family of 4? Christ, I'd be pissed off if I found that out...that's a little less than half thedebt I'd get from a student loan...

...****, I wonder how much it cost the UK government...
cakaeroryrere is offline


Old 11-13-2007, 09:44 PM   #10
L8fGLM4d

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
551
Senior Member
Default
Nice claim. Got any proof though?
L8fGLM4d is offline


Old 11-13-2007, 10:16 PM   #11
Manteiv

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
371
Senior Member
Default
So none of the money came from borrowing at all?
Manteiv is offline


Old 11-13-2007, 10:40 PM   #12
AncewwewBus

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
So...all of the money spent has been raised by taxes on the population and on businesses...and not a single cent was borrowed to pay for the war?
AncewwewBus is offline


Old 11-13-2007, 10:48 PM   #13
Inonanialry

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
458
Senior Member
Default
I never claimed that figure was correct. All I said was that I'd be unhappy if I found out I'd paid that figure to support the war

The only thing no one has bothered to think about yet is what effect the borrowing has had on the economy, and who is paying what because of those effects to suppport the war. There is alot more to the financial side of the war than saying "It cost X amount, but we said Y years ago it would cost Z amount".
Inonanialry is offline


Old 11-13-2007, 11:24 PM   #14
perhilzit

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
368
Senior Member
Default
I get more posts this way.
perhilzit is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:22 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity