LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 11-10-2007, 02:14 AM   #1
leangarance

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
499
Senior Member
Default LAPD zeroes in on Muslim communities
Originally posted by BlackCat
About the "unfairly targets Muslims" - well, I do understand their annoyance, but at the moment muslim belivers are those that mainly make **** happens. In LA? Are they using gang colored turbans these days or something?
leangarance is offline


Old 11-10-2007, 02:48 AM   #2
jurnalkduo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
390
Senior Member
Default
Threats of terrorism from the muslim community is the least of LA's problem. Currently, there is what many consider to be a race war raging between hispanic and black gangs.

LA is like a Microcasm for what's wrong with America these days.
jurnalkduo is offline


Old 11-10-2007, 02:58 AM   #3
neictscek

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by BlackCat
Just out of curiosity - how many suicide bombs are the LA gangs activating ? No need to give precise numbers - a weekly average is fine. I see... suicide bombings are the only problem in the world today. Thanks for clearing that up for us.
neictscek is offline


Old 11-10-2007, 03:19 AM   #4
xanax-buy-online.com

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
519
Senior Member
Default
Why not build concentration camps to keep all Muslims at bay as long as the War on Terror goes on? It worked to contain teh evil Japanese in WW2.

To make it less unpleasant for the inhabitants, it could be placed on some paradise resort in the Caribbean. Don't you have some navy bases on Cuba for instance?
xanax-buy-online.com is offline


Old 11-10-2007, 03:43 AM   #5
metropropuskruww

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
389
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by BlackCat
No offense, but I think that LAPD are able to multitask. Please tell if you have other experiences. LAPD's ability to multitask has nothing to do with what you've said. You said Muslims start most of the **** in LA. You tried to back up that assertion by saying gang violence wasn't suicide bombing. We can sum up your point as:

"Muslims are the problem with everything and I refuse to observe any evidence to the contrary."
metropropuskruww is offline


Old 11-10-2007, 03:55 AM   #6
boiffrona

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
606
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by BlackCat


Well, that is probably a solution in socialist "democracies" such as sweden but it isn't allowed elsewere. Sweden never had concentration camps. Except for some communists during WW2. And we currently have a right wing government (which some would still call socialistic, or at least liberal).

You should read my former post again, with your sarcasm detector on, to understand my parallells between the American concentration camps in WW2 and today's Guantanamo.
boiffrona is offline


Old 11-10-2007, 04:12 AM   #7
geasurpacerma

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
325
Senior Member
Default
In LA? Are they using gang colored turbans these days or something? The Sikh wear turbans, Muslims are towel heads

Just out of curiosity - how many suicide bombs are the LA gangs activating ? No need to give precise numbers - a weekly average is fine. Same as LA Muslims - 0
geasurpacerma is offline


Old 11-10-2007, 04:43 AM   #8
foodselfdourileka

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
515
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by BlackCat
I assume that you are pretty tired since you aren't able to figure out that I in no way said anything about that muslim terrorism was LAPD's major threat.

I guess it's the same reason why you fantasy about me thinking that muslims are the main reason of violence in LA. You were justifying "unfairly targetting Muslims", because "Muslim belivers are those that mainly make **** happens." And doing so in response to an article about the LAPD. Then you made some inane remark about how LA gangs didn't suicide bomb to support your previous statement... which further cemented the fact that you were talking about LA specifically when claiming Muslims were mainly the problem the LAPD should be watching out for.

When called on that, you further corroborated this with: "Well, I guess that most Londoners would have said the same [that muslims weren't a problem] some years ago. Unfortunatedly, they were wrong" and "No offense, but I think that LAPD are able to multitask."

We all know what you're saying. Do you?

Well, if thats' your belief, I pity you, but it isn't mine - I tend to go a bit further. It's my summation of your statements in this thread so far. You know, what I meant when I said, "We can sum up your point as:"

In that statement "your" is refering to you. Not me. If I was refering to me I would have said "my".
foodselfdourileka is offline


Old 11-10-2007, 04:56 AM   #9
wheettebott

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
390
Senior Member
Default
DP
wheettebott is offline


Old 11-10-2007, 05:17 AM   #10
SarSerceSaice

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
486
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Riesstiu IV
Threats of terrorism from the muslim community is the least of LA's problem. Currently, there is what many consider to be a race war raging between hispanic and black gangs.

LA is like a Microcasm for what's wrong with America these days. LAX was targeted with a truck bomb by an Islamic extremist group back in 2001. Fortunately they got caught before they could carry out their plan.
SarSerceSaice is offline


Old 11-10-2007, 06:30 AM   #11
dietpillxanaxaxx

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
374
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by SpencerH
On the third hand we could just say ****it, nuke the whole useless area and call it even. LA?
dietpillxanaxaxx is offline


Old 11-10-2007, 06:32 AM   #12
IodinkBoilk

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
453
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by BlackCat
1 mill. what is that ? way less than 1 % - many european countries has much higher.

It's not the muslims that are the problem, it's those members of the muslim community that gets extreme that are. Those you can't find unless you dig into the muslim community. How many terrorists attacks have been carried out by Muslim Americans?
IodinkBoilk is offline


Old 11-10-2007, 06:34 AM   #13
ArraryTauTDew

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
441
Senior Member
Default
Well there's at least 2 in jail for giving support to AQ.
ArraryTauTDew is offline


Old 11-10-2007, 06:34 AM   #14
CarmenSanches

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
Sorry but someones got to sacrifice for the greater good.
CarmenSanches is offline


Old 11-10-2007, 06:50 AM   #15
newwebstar

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
491
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by SpencerH
On the one hand our enemies are moslems so it makes sense to focus resources on such groups. Err... our enemies are an extremist Muslim group... not Muslims in general. This conflating of the two is what is causing this problem.
newwebstar is offline


Old 11-10-2007, 10:22 PM   #16
Borzopayn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
452
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Aeson


You were justifying "unfairly targetting Muslims", because "Muslim belivers are those that mainly make **** happens." And doing so in response to an article about the LAPD. Then you made some inane remark about how LA gangs didn't suicide bomb to support your previous statement... which further cemented the fact that you were talking about LA specifically when claiming Muslims were mainly the problem the LAPD should be watching out for. Sorry, but it's only in your fantasy that I was talking about LA when saying that extreme muslims are mostly responsible for terrorist actions currently. About the gangs, well, no offense, but it was you that brought LA gangs into the discussion, so please stop fantasize about what I meant.

When called on that, you further corroborated this with: "Well, I guess that most Londoners would have said the same [that muslims weren't a problem] some years ago. Unfortunatedly, they were wrong" and "No offense, but I think that LAPD are able to multitask."


We all know what you're saying. Do you? Yep, I certainly do, but I think you have a reading/comprehension problem. Before the bombings in London I guess that most brits would have thought it impossible what happened - why do whine when LAPD are doing what most londoners would have wished SY had done ?

It's my summation of your statements in this thread so far. You know, what I meant when I said, "We can sum up your point as:"

In that statement "your" is refering to you. Not me. If I was refering to me I would have said "my". Yeah, except the fact that I have never stated what you claimed, so I naturally assumed it was you opinion.
Borzopayn is offline


Old 11-11-2007, 01:18 AM   #17
IntinyBut

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
491
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by BlackCat
Ehrm, please tell me where I fail when I claim that most current terrorist actions are done by muslims ? "most current terrorist actions" != "most **** happens"

The latter is what you actually said, the former what you're now trying to pretend you said. You fail in that attempt at obfuscation.

This is really funny. I probably should have added some kind of irony smiley to my question about gang suicide bombers, but I actually thought it would be obvious that such don't happen - that you took me serious tells more about you than me. Keep running from everything you posted. You obviously have been trying to deflect all the "LA Muslims aren't a problem" statements instead of actually addressing the point. You do so because you know your statement is unsupportable.

You attempted to justify "unfairly targets Muslims" with "muslim belivers are those that mainly make **** happens".

This is your claim, not mine. If you read carefully, you will see that I actually says the opposite, so if it's obviosly not my pov, it must be yours. Keep pretending "your" = "my" all you want. Just makes it funnier.
IntinyBut is offline


Old 11-11-2007, 02:35 AM   #18
8IhGpvH0

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
341
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Err... our enemies are an extremist Muslim group... not Muslims in general. This conflating of the two is what is causing this problem. You were just misreading; he said the enemies are Muslim, not that Muslims are the enemy. You can say the former without necessarily implying the latter, but granted it still could have been a better choice of words.
8IhGpvH0 is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:32 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity