General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#2 |
|
I love the fearmongering ... "Industries will wither away". No, no they won't. Really. I promise.
What will happen is you will lose a bit of your industry, and then the CA$ will drop a bit, until it's profitable again to manufacture north of the border, at which point the CA$ will rise again... After all, if having a higher currency than the US was a horrible thing, wouldn't England have gone in the tubes decades ago? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
Parity means nothing, in and of itself. CA$ 0.98:US$1.00 as opposed to CA$1.02:US$1.00 are essentially identical situations. What is relevant to the industry calculation is the cost in US$ of doing business in Canada versus the cost of such in the US. If that comparitive cost hasn't changed much (4% in that example) then who cares?
If the Yen were to be 20:1 USD, that would be a lot more of a concern for Japan than CA$ 1: US$1, for example. Parity in and of itself is meaningless. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
Originally posted by snoopy369
Absolutely. The context of my above quote was that parity in and of itself is irrelevant - ie, changing from 0.98:1 to 1.02:1 is basically irrelevant. The 35% change over the course of several years is most definitely relevant... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
Originally posted by snoopy369
Parity means nothing, in and of itself. CA$ 0.98:US$1.00 as opposed to CA$1.02:US$1.00 are essentially identical situations. What is relevant to the industry calculation is the cost in US$ of doing business in Canada versus the cost of such in the US. If that comparitive cost hasn't changed much (4% in that example) then who cares? If the Yen were to be 20:1 USD, that would be a lot more of a concern for Japan than CA$ 1: US$1, for example. Parity in and of itself is meaningless. There is more at issue here than just industry. The higher our dollar goes the less I will pay for California fruits and veggies when the snow starts flying here. Not to mention, any other goods I buy from the US. Granted, while is little difference between .99 and 1.00 there is a heck of a difference between .81 (where we were not too long ago) and 1.00. Personally, I would be happy with a dollar at par. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
Originally posted by Asher
It's Albertan Oil, not Canadian. True. That is the cause. Once again, Alberta straps the Canadian economy to its back and carries it along. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
Originally posted by Kuciwalker
I'm curious: is there any economic reason that just using the USD as your currency would be a bad idea? You mean besides the end of independent monetary policy? The Fed just slashed your rates, the BoC is holding steady and may (albeit probably unlikely at this point) be raising ours because our economy isn't going into the toilet. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
Originally posted by Kontiki
Alberta oil accounts for a little more than 2/3 of our output. Granted, by far the largest component, but there is still significant production in Saskatchewan, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland as well. It sounds to me like you're talking about petroleum rather than the larger energy industry... |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|