LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 07-01-2007, 04:13 AM   #21
HondasMenFox

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
334
Senior Member
Default
I don't think an open borders system implies that we accept countries actively sending groups of people here.
HondasMenFox is offline


Old 07-01-2007, 04:20 AM   #22
Frannypaync

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
402
Senior Member
Default
Even assuming that the system could handle it, I think that it would still be likely that people would want to come to the U.S. after the jobs have dried up. What would they have to lose?

I'd choose a job in my own country over no job in America. Unless I lived in Zimbabwe, that is.
Frannypaync is offline


Old 07-01-2007, 04:22 AM   #23
CHEAPSOFTOEMONLINE

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
401
Senior Member
Default
The US has pretty low unemployment. I suspect that our economy can find uses for a lot more workers.
CHEAPSOFTOEMONLINE is offline


Old 07-01-2007, 07:12 AM   #24
rammossyAcron

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
370
Senior Member
Default
Oh, boo hoo.
rammossyAcron is offline


Old 07-01-2007, 07:17 AM   #25
T5qYkHWQ

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
429
Senior Member
Default
Here's what I think. Seal the borders, give the guards authorization to fire at whomever starts across.
At the same time, those who are in, can stay in; provided they declare themselves and are given an identification card like any other person.
I don't know about California, but in Texas an i.d. is required, either a driver's license or other.
T5qYkHWQ is offline


Old 07-01-2007, 07:39 AM   #26
riverakathy

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
461
Senior Member
Default
Oerdin goes through these phases. Like a female and her time of the month. No biggie.
riverakathy is offline


Old 07-01-2007, 07:44 AM   #27
iNYZgxNC

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
466
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
Do we really need Oerdin in here calling people racists again? Isn't that what got the original thread deleted? The original thread was deleted, against my will, because the mods decided we were engaging in personal attacks.
iNYZgxNC is offline


Old 07-01-2007, 09:15 AM   #28
rNr5Di3S

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
510
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by chegitz guevara
That's kinda like saying, we shouldn't bother to put out that house fire because there are just going to be more. No, it's kinda like saying we shouldn't bother pouring gasoline on the house fire just for the sake of saying we did something about the problem. I fail to see anything noble in taking an action simply for th sake of taking action when it won't accomplish the goals set out.
rNr5Di3S is offline


Old 07-01-2007, 09:36 AM   #29
bebeacc

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
Oh I believe you. I'm just amused you worded it "decided we were engaging in personal attacks" instead of "recognized the obvious."
bebeacc is offline


Old 07-01-2007, 09:37 AM   #30
Usendyduexy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
660
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by DinoDoc
No, it's kinda like saying we shouldn't bother pouring gasoline on the house fire just for the sake of saying we did something about the problem. I fail to see anything noble in taking an action simply for th sake of taking action when it won't accomplish the goals set out. The stated goals were to 1) make it harder for illegals to find jobs in the US and 2) to get 12 million people out of the shadows, to pay back taxes, and to find a path to earned legalization. The bill would have accomplished those goals.

The new national data base and "real ID" cards would have made it impossible for employers to claim they didn't know workers were illegal and the earned citizenship path would have taken 12 million people out of the shadows and on to the path to legalization. It would have accomplished all of the goals set out.
Usendyduexy is offline


Old 07-01-2007, 09:40 AM   #31
PerfectCreditForYou

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
362
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Kuciwalker
Oh I believe you. I'm just amused you worded it "decided we were engaging in personal attacks" instead of "recognized the obvious." I don't speak for Ming. He told me the personal attacks had to end and that similiar PMs were sent to the other parties.
PerfectCreditForYou is offline


Old 07-01-2007, 09:40 AM   #32
proslaviy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
349
Senior Member
Default
He lied to you.
proslaviy is offline


Old 07-01-2007, 09:42 AM   #33
ZenDers

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
639
Senior Member
Default
I didn't lie... personal attacks will stop... or some posters won't be posting much longer.

Now get back on topic
ZenDers is offline


Old 07-01-2007, 09:56 AM   #34
Rapiddude

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
314
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by SlowwHand
Here's what I think. Seal the borders, give the guards authorization to fire at whomever starts across.
At the same time, those who are in, can stay in; provided they declare themselves and are given an identification card like any other person.
I don't know about California, but in Texas an i.d. is required, either a driver's license or other. What you're not understanding is everyone uses fake documents now days and the employers know the documents are fake but the police have to prove it which is almost impossible since there is no independent way of verifying that documents are real. The new data base would have made it the employers responsibility to check documents against the data base so if an illegal was found working for them they couldn't claim they didn't know. That's now out the window.
Rapiddude is offline


Old 07-01-2007, 10:23 AM   #35
Si8jy8HN

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
485
Senior Member
Default
The real goal of the bill was to further alienate the GOP from Hispanics. It has been immensely successful. Shame that they're gonna vote Democrat though.
Si8jy8HN is offline


Old 07-01-2007, 07:27 PM   #36
Ijkavylo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
496
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Kuciwalker
I would rather businesses hire illegals than not hire anyone.
Why would you say something so odd?
No, it's not meant as a rhetorical question. You wish.
Ijkavylo is offline


Old 07-01-2007, 07:43 PM   #37
Byxtysaaqwuz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
481
Senior Member
Default
There are no such thing as "no more jobs", they'll simply have to work for a lower wage then the guy who came in ahead of them.

Immigrants who came in through open borders would work for the minimum wage or higher. Since their entry into the US wasn't illegal, there's no reason for them not to report employers who try to break the minimum wage law.
Byxtysaaqwuz is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:31 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity