LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 04-03-2007, 05:04 PM   #1
Goseciwx

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
467
Senior Member
Default Unintentional cleverness
Goseciwx is offline


Old 04-03-2007, 07:23 PM   #2
vypusknye

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
395
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Ecthy
It seems I need basic lessons in North American culture because I don't find that one example posted by LH remotely funny. To PhD it for you, Pamela Anderson is an individual often brought up (as it was in this case) as an example of "American fake sexuality" (bleached hair, breast implants etc). The joke here is that Pam Anderson is actually a Canadian who moved to the US. She's a reimportation of that fake sexuality. The author has unintentionally provided another example of the process he is describing, and it is amusing.
vypusknye is offline


Old 04-03-2007, 07:39 PM   #3
lorrieholdridge

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
452
Senior Member
Default
That bee is SCARY. Especially the big close-up of its face, with those vacant, smiling eyes. "Big Brother Bee is watching you." On the other hand, the real face of a bee is pretty scary too. Five eyes, and two of them compound. I wonder which is scarier?

I didn't get it when KH first posted it, not knowing anything about Pamela Anderson. I still only find it mildly funny, perhaps because Canada is pretty much America anyway. "America, only lamer and colder," that's Canada.
lorrieholdridge is offline


Old 04-03-2007, 07:52 PM   #4
Honealals

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
440
Senior Member
Default
I could imagine the Jollibee character being described in a Phillip K Dick novel,
representing a nightmarish, fascist big-brother symbol of corporate dystopia...!

Honealals is offline


Old 04-03-2007, 07:55 PM   #5
joe-salton

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
464
Senior Member
Default
I could imagine him replacing ceiling cat

joe-salton is offline


Old 04-03-2007, 07:59 PM   #6
Soolfelpecelf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
509
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Barnabas
I could imagine him replacing ceiling cat

lol brachy's a theef LOL
Soolfelpecelf is offline


Old 04-03-2007, 08:06 PM   #7
WFSdZuP3

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
428
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Barnabas
French Canada has a personality, the rest might as well be the USA Once that idiot Bush is out of the way and Quebec votes for independence then we will enact the Anschluss.
WFSdZuP3 is offline


Old 04-03-2007, 08:09 PM   #8
amagmasia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
429
Senior Member
Default
Why do the rest want to keep Quebec, anyway? I mean, it's not like it (or the Maritimes) fulfill any useful function ...
amagmasia is offline


Old 04-03-2007, 08:12 PM   #9
Zhgpavye

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
538
Senior Member
Default
Oerdin, you know they are properly coding their site, right? There's fundamentally no other way to prevent people from deep-linking to your images.
Zhgpavye is offline


Old 04-03-2007, 09:18 PM   #10
mpegdvdclip

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
477
Senior Member
Default
Yes.

Show me a way (apart from writing your entire site in Flash ffs) that you can design a site with pictures on it that people can't link to.
mpegdvdclip is offline


Old 04-03-2007, 09:22 PM   #11
Haibundadam

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
434
Senior Member
Default
Go ahead and try to leech something from poly and see how it doesn't work. Effectively the same thing only instead of replacing the leeched picture with "I'm a thief" or other such nonsense they just delete the picture. The point is still made and the leeching stops.

Next you can also disable the right click when the mouse goes over your images though a smart person can still get them from the cache.
Haibundadam is offline


Old 04-03-2007, 09:24 PM   #12
euylvaygdq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
624
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Oerdin
Go ahead and try to leech something from poly and see how it doesn't work. Effectively the same thing only instead of replacing the leeched picture with "I'm a thief" or other such nonsense they just delete the picture. No they don't.

Next you can also disable the right click when the mouse goes over your images though a smart person can still get them from the cache. Only idiots are stopped by the right-click bit. alt-v-o ftw.
euylvaygdq is offline


Old 04-03-2007, 09:27 PM   #13
AffipgyncDync

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
462
Senior Member
Default
Actually, image linking costs the site owner money. The site owner usually says "put up the image but host it yourself."
AffipgyncDync is offline


Old 04-03-2007, 09:32 PM   #14
NutChusty

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
565
Senior Member
Default
Also, anyone who puts up the right-click protection comes off as irritatingly amateur.
NutChusty is offline


Old 04-03-2007, 09:35 PM   #15
ibupronec

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
365
Senior Member
Default
I ate at a Jollibee when I was in the Phils.

It was the worst fast food I've had -- EVER!
ibupronec is offline


Old 04-03-2007, 09:55 PM   #16
steevyjeors

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
464
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Asher

It's not the solution used by the author of the page being discussed. How is it significantly different than returning a stock image "you're stealing my bandwidth"?
steevyjeors is offline


Old 04-03-2007, 10:09 PM   #17
Eromereorybig

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
469
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by aneeshm
Beats any burger hollow. What do they got that McDonald's doesn't?
Eromereorybig is offline


Old 04-03-2007, 10:17 PM   #18
Precturge

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
585
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Kuciwalker
Also, anyone who puts up the right-click protection comes off as irritatingly amateur. I've often wondered about that; is there some reason why people couldn't make a Firefox mod to circumvent that restriction (i.e., can the server somehow restrict data based on its intended use at the other end)? It doesn't sound likely to me, but I'm ignorant of PC workings. Or is it so easy to get around that nobody bothers to do even that much?
Precturge is offline


Old 04-03-2007, 11:15 PM   #19
OWDavid

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
464
Senior Member
Default
Ah, so it has been done. Thanks, Asher.
OWDavid is offline


Old 04-04-2007, 12:29 AM   #20
largonioulurI

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
450
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Asher
Do you have problems comprehending what i meant by "null image?" I assumed it was a 0-byte image or something similar. Anyway, both cases are discrimination based on the referrer tag, which was what I was getting at.
largonioulurI is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:13 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity