LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 02-16-2007, 09:11 PM   #21
rammossyAcron

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
370
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by lord of the mark
In Comp sci, wouldnt "restore" family "values" mean something different?

Comment, X is Family
Initialize value of X, X=0
X= X+1
various stuff
Restore X to X=0

or something like that? X=X+1?

That means X-X=1 no?

So 0=1...

Spec.
rammossyAcron is offline


Old 02-16-2007, 09:22 PM   #22
vekiuytyh

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
449
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Lorizael
No Spec. It means you add 1 onto the value of the variable X. So if X=3, then after the computer reads that line, X=4. Ok....computer programming. Hmmmm.

I'm not too good in that field.

I thought it worked the same as algebra.

Spec.
vekiuytyh is offline


Old 02-16-2007, 09:28 PM   #23
Hsmrcahr

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
429
Senior Member
Default
Spec, blah blah blah, don't listen to these turds. "="-operator is nto the same as equals. "==" is equals. IF you want to read it, just read x = x+1 as x's value is x + 1. Forget about these lefts and rights. Let's just stick to what it really is, and what it is, it's just a mistake Spec made with the operator. Stick your lefts and rights to your butts, sirs!
Hsmrcahr is offline


Old 02-16-2007, 09:34 PM   #24
xanax-buy-online.com

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
519
Senior Member
Default
It did, because I put it like it is, in simple terms It didn't have anything to do with anything else than the operator itself, so the most logical approach is to explain what that operator does. I know. I'm glorious.
xanax-buy-online.com is offline


Old 02-16-2007, 09:45 PM   #25
UriyVlasov

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
511
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by The Mad Viking
Kuci, your license to use the word "proved" has been revoked.

Step away from the car, and lay the word on the ground. Don't ever touch the word again, you cannot be trusted with it. I understand the word far better than you do, obviously.
UriyVlasov is offline


Old 02-16-2007, 10:38 PM   #26
Meenepek

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
500
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Arrian
Wow, did some people really not get the joke? I have no compsci background at all and I get it (sorta).

-Arrian I'm french...

Spec.
Meenepek is offline


Old 02-16-2007, 10:56 PM   #27
IrrettelatWet

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
431
Senior Member
Default
Well technically the result (of allowing same-sex pairing) is that we have to permit any number and combination of sexes.
IrrettelatWet is offline


Old 02-16-2007, 11:04 PM   #28
Khurlxgq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
578
Senior Member
Default
He thinks his model accurately depicts real world outcomes despite obviously flawed assumptions. I still say he will make it big as an economist if he so desires.

Climate scientist, too. Kuci, you're so smart...
Khurlxgq is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:22 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity