[JamesTornC]

The Supreme Court there recently ruled that banning gay marriage is fine because the state has an interest in regulating procreation.

If the purpose of marriage is indeed procreation, then it is logical that all marriages should require it, and be dissolved if it does not in fact occur.
The conservatives have a choice: They can accept it (and thus pwn a lot of heterosexual couples) or they can reject it (and thus admit that their reasoning is flawed)
That is the entire point of this initiative.

I should note that we had this discussion on Eventis far before this, once again proving the general superiority of the Eventian people.

[Kilaoksrsa]

Originally posted by Tacc
The Supreme Court there recently ruled that banning gay marriage is fine because the state has an interest in regulating procreation.

If the purpose of marriage is indeed procreation, then it is logical that all marriages should require it, and be dissolved if it does not in fact occur.
The conservatives have a choice: They can accept it (and thus pwn a lot of heterosexual couples) or they can reject it (and thus admit that their reasoning is flawed)
That is the entire point of this initiative. Quoted for I was going to post this, then noticed you already had.

[Lilji]

Maybe the guy should have to prove he doesn't shoot blanks.

[lXwVlTgO]

Ben Kenobi should like this.

[ZZtop]

So am I the only one who finds it funny that the so called pro-marriage people actually harm real marriages more then the supposedly anti-marriage gay people?

[geraint.faughn]

Originally posted by Tacc

I should note that we had this discussion on Eventis far before this, once again proving the general superiority of the Eventian people.
We had it on SDN far before this, thus Proving the superiority of SDNetters.

[Feloascarlelt]

The proposed proposition does not go far enough.

It should also annul any marriage after the woman goes through menopause or the man becomes impotent.

[AnimeThat]

They should do what Texas did and outlaw all marriage.